Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T17:09:00.957Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Industrial Composition, Methods of Compensation and Real Earnings in the Great Depression

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2020

Robert A. Hart  and
J. Elizabeth Roberts
Robert A. Hart*
Affiliation:
University of Stirling and IZA
J. Elizabeth Roberts
Affiliation:
University of Stirling
*
E-mail: r.a.hart@stir.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A major objective of the government during the Great Recession has been severely to restrict public sector real wage growth. One potential advantage of performance-related pay schemes is that they naturally offer greater wage responsiveness to fluctuations in the business cycle. Based on evidence from engineering and allied industries during the Great Depression we show that piecework wages exhibited more flexibility than their timework equivalents. We compare and contrast southern/midland engineering districts of Britain with northern districts. The former region was dominated by piece-rated workers and by modern sections of the industry, such as vehicle and aircraft manufacture. Time-rated work predominated in northern districts where older sections – for example, marine and textile engineering – were clustered‥

Keywords

industrial compositionpieceworktimeworkreal earningsthe Great DepressionE32J31J33N64
Type
Research Articles
Information
National Institute Economic Review , Volume 226 , November 2013 , pp. R17 - R29
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This work was funded by ESRC Grant RES-000–22–3574. We are grateful to the Engineering Employers’ Federation (EEF) for allowing access to their payroll records and to Warwick University Modern Record Centre and Glasgow University Archive Centre for their help in assembling the data and to Andrew Currall for his excellent work in data transcription. We thank a reviewer and the editors for their comments. The full EEF data base, containing all EEF data and accompanying unemployment rates used in this project, is available at the UK Data Archive, Study 5569 (http://www.esds.ac.uk/findingData/snDescription.asp?sn=5569).

References

Brown, C. (1992), ‘Wage levels and method of pay’, Rand Journal of Economics, 23, pp. 366–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devereux, P.J. (2001), ‘The cyclicality of real wages within employer-employee matches’, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 54, pp. 835–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feinstein, C.H. (1972), National Income, Expenditure and Output of the United Kingdom 1855–1965, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hart, R.A.MacKay, D.I. (1975), ‘Engineering earnings in Britain, 1926–1938, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (Series A), 138, pp. 32–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, R.A.Roberts, J.E. (2013), ‘Real wage cyclicality and the Great Depression: evidence from British engineering and metal working firms’, Oxford Economic Papers, 65, pp. 197–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helper, S.Kleiner, M.P.Wang, Y. (2010), ‘Analyzing compensation methods in manufacturing: piece rates, time rates, or gain sharing?’, NBER Working Paper Series, No.16540.Google Scholar
Holmstrom, B.Milgrom, P. (1991), ‘Incentive contracts, asset ownership, and job design’, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 7, pp. 24–52 (Special Issue).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knowles, K.G.J.C.Hill, T.P. (1954), ‘The structure of engineering earnings’, Bulletin of the Oxford University Institute of Statistics, 16, pp. 272–328.Google Scholar
Knowles, K.G.J.C.Robertson, D.J. (1951), ‘Earnings in engineering, 1926–1948’, Bulletin of the Oxford University Institute of Statistics, 13, pp. 179–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazear, E.P. (1986), ‘Salaries and piece rates’, Journal of Business, 59, pp. 405–31.Google Scholar
Lazear, E.P. (2000), ‘Performance pay and productivity’, American Economic Review, 90, pp. 1346–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pencavel, J. (1977), ‘Work effort, on-the-job screening, and alternative methods of remuneration’, Research in Labor Economics, 1, pp. 225–58.Google Scholar
Pissarides, C.A. (2009), ‘The unemployment volatility puzzle: is wage stickiness the answer?’, Econometrica, 77, pp. 1339–69.Google Scholar
Seiler, E. (1984), ‘Piece rate vs. time rate: the effect of incentives on earnings’, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 66, pp. 363–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wigham, E. (1973), The Power to Manage. A History of the Engineering Employers’ Federation, London, Macmillan.Google Scholar