Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T14:50:46.170Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

International Differences in Manufacturing Unit Labour Costs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2020

Mary O'Mahony
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article presents measures o f competitiveness in manufacturing comparing Britain to Germany, France and the United States. Data from the National Accounts and the Census of Production are combined to derive new estimates of relative unit labour costs for a number of manufacturing industries. The results show that British manufacturing had a competitive advantage over Germany and France in 1993. This arose primarily from the devaluation of Sterling and followed a period, from 1989 to 1992, when unit labour costs in British manufacturing were generally close to those in Germany and France. Unit labour costs in American manufacturing, however, were considerably lower than in the European countries in 1993. The results by industry show that Britain performs relatively poorly in much of the engineering sector while being relatively more competitive in consumer goods industries. Over time changes in the market exchange rates and nominal wage inflation have large impacts on the relative competitive position of total manufacturing in the four countries whereas productivity growth plays a minor role. However, at the industry level productivity growth is important. In the face of similar movements in relative nominal wages across industries, differences in productivity performance distinguish those British industries which gained ground over their rivals abroad from those whose competitive position worsened.

Type
Articles
Information
National Institute Economic Review , Volume 154 , November 1995 , pp. 85 - 110
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

∗

This study was financed by a grant from The Department of Trade and Industry who bear no responsibility for the conclusions or any errors. I would like to thank Bart van Ark for supplying some of the data and for comments on an earlier draft. Helpful comments were also received from economists in the DTI, in particular, David Higham, Ray Barrell, Stephen Broadberry, Nicholas Oulton and colleagues at the National Institute.

References

Barrell, R., Britton, A., and Pain, N.,(1994),‘When the time was right? the UK experience of the ERM’, National Institute Discussion Paper no. 58.Google Scholar
Broadberry, S.,(1993),‘Manufacturing and the convergence hypothesis: what the long run data show’, The Journal of Economic History, vol. 53, pp.772–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, W. and Wadhwani, S. (1990), ‘The economic effects of industrial relations legislation since 1979’, National Institute Economic Review, no. 131 (February), pp. 57–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooper, P. and Larin, K.A. (1989), ‘International comparisons of labour costs in manufacturing’, The Review of Income and Wealth, series 35, no.4, December.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagomiya, N. (1993), ‘Productivity levels in UK and Japanese manufacturing’, M.Phil dissertation, University of Warwick.Google Scholar
O'Mahony, M. (1992), ‘Productivity levels in British and German manufacturing’, National Institute Economic Review, no. 139, February.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Mahony, M., Wagner, K. and Paulssen, M. (1994), ‘Changing fortunes: an industry study of British and German productivity growth over three decades’, National Institute Report series, no.7Google Scholar
Oulton, N. (1994), ‘Labour productivity and unit labour costs in manufacturing: the UK and its competitors’, National Institute Economic Review, no. 148 (May), pp. 49–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Ark, B.,(1990a)., ‘Comparative levels of labour productivity in Dutch and British manufacturing’, National Institute Economic Review, no. 131 (February), pp. 71–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Ark, B.,(1990b), ‘Manufacturing productivity levels in France and the United Kingdom’, National Institute Economic Review, no. 133 (August), pp. 62–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Ark, B. (1992), ‘Comparative productivity in British and American manufacturing’, National Institute Economic Review, no. 142 (November), pp. 63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Ark, B.,(1993), International Comparisons of Output and Productivity: Manufacturing Productivity Performance of Ten Countries from 1950 to 1990, GroningenGrowth and Development Centre, Monograph Series no.1.Google Scholar