Article contents
Setting Targets for Health Care Performance: Lessons from a Case Study of the English NHS
Lessons from a Case Study of the English NHS
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 March 2020
Abstract
This paper examines problems of setting targets for health care performance in which the centre sets a uniform set of targets and levels of performance. The case study examined by the paper is from the system of performance assessment of ‘star ratings’ that was introduced from 2001 by the Department of Health to give each organisation in the NHS in England a single summary score from zero rating to three stars. Star ratings were directed at holding trusts' chief executives to account for the local delivery of national priorities through a process of ‘naming and shaming’, in which Chief Executives of zero-rated organisations were at risk of losing their jobs. This paper outlines the underlying model and its three underlying assumptions: the centre can determine a scoring system to prioritise what matters; failures of performance that are not reflected in the scoring system do not matter; and the advantages of a system of scoring on accountable targets outweigh the disadvantages of various types of gaming responses. This paper examines the application of the model of star ratings to a case study of Primary Care Trusts (PCTs), which are complex organisations with three diverse sets of responsibilities: delivering primary care, commissioning secondary care, and supervising public health. It outlines an alternative model and the issues this raises for governance of health care performance.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2006 National Institute of Economic and Social Research
Footnotes
This is a revised version of a paper presented at the eleventh meeting of the European Health Policy Group, September 2005, University of Perugia and the fourth NIESR Public Service Performance Conference, January 2006, British Academy. I am grateful for comments from Tessa Crilly, Nicholas Mays and Philip Stevens.
References
- 19
- Cited by