Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T04:16:42.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Political mobilization in East Central Europe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Ulf Brunnbauer*
Affiliation:
Institute for East and Southeast European Studies, Regensburg, Germany
Peter Haslinger
Affiliation:
Herder Institute for Historical Research on East Central Europe, Marburg, Germany
*
Corresponding author. Email: ulf.brunnbauer@ur.de

Abstract

This article provides an introduction to the special thematic section on political mobilization in East Central Europe. Based on a brief presentation of the main arguments of the individual articles, the authors discuss the recent political volatility in East Central Europe. They highlight the tension between fierce political rhetoric and populist policies on the one hand, and low levels of voter turnout and overall political participation in the region on the other. The authors argue that recent cases of successful as well as unsuccessful political mobilization in East Central Europe point to structural re-alignments in the region's political landscape. In particular, the parties that are successful are those that manage to communicate their visions in new ways and whose messages resonate with nested attitudes and preferences of the electorate. These parties typically rally against the so-called establishment and claim for themselves an anti-hegemonic agenda. The introductory essay also asserts that these developments in East Central Europe deserve attention for their potential Europe-wide repercussions – especially the idea of “illiberal democracy,”which combines populist mobilization and autocratic demobilization and finds adherents also in more established European democracies.

Type
Special Section: Political Mobilization in East Central Europe
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 Association for the Study of Nationalities 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cameron, David R. 1974. “Toward a Theory of Political Mobilization.” The Journal of Politics 36 (1): 138171.Google Scholar
Ekiert, Grzegor. 2015. “Three Generations of Research on Post-Communist Politics – A Sketch.” East European Politics and Societies and Cultures 29 (2): 322337.Google Scholar
Gagnon, Valère P. 2004. The Myth of Ethnic War: Serbia and Croatia in the 1990s. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Gherghina, Sergiu, and Tseng, Huan-Kai. 2016. “Voting home or abroad? Comparing migrants’ electoral participation in countries of origin and of residence.” Nationalities Papers 44 (3): 456472.Google Scholar
Haughton, Tim, and Deegan-Krause, Kevin. 2015. “Hurricane Season: Systems of Instability in Central and Eastern European Party Politics.” East European Politics and Societies and Cultures 29 (1): 6180.Google Scholar
Koenen, Krisztina. 2015. “Orbánismus in Ungarn. Ursprünge und Elemente der ‘illiberalen’ Demokratie.” Osteuropa 65 (11–12): 3344.Google Scholar
Kühnlein, Michael, ed. 2014. Das Politische und das Vorpolitische: über die Wertgrundlagen der Demokratie. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
OECD. 2013. Government at a Glance 2013. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Rovny, Jan. 2015. “Party Competition Structure in Eastern Europe: Aggregate Uniformity Versus Idiosyncratic Diversity?East European Politics and Societies and Cultures 29 (1): 4060.Google Scholar
Tatar, Marius. 2015. “Rediscovering Protest: Reflections on the Development and Consequences of the Early 2012 Romanian Protests.” Journal of Identity and Migration Studies 9 (2): 6285.Google Scholar
Ther, Philipp. 2014. Die neue Ordnung auf dem alten Kontinent. Eine Geschichte des neoliberalen Europe. Berlin: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Vierling, Birgit. 2014. Kommunikation als Mittel politischer Mobilisierung: die Sudetendeutsche Partei (SdP) auf ihrem Weg zur Einheitsbewegung in der Ersten Tschechoslowakischen Republik (1933–1938). Marburg: Verlag Herder-Institut.Google Scholar