Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T02:53:14.336Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Language territorial regimes in multilingual ethnic territorial autonomies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Nadezhda Borisova Open the ORCID record for Nadezhda Borisova [Opens in a new window]  and
Konstantin Sulimov Open the ORCID record for Konstantin Sulimov [Opens in a new window]
Nadezhda Borisova*
Affiliation:
Political Science Department, Perm State University, Perm, Russia
Konstantin Sulimov
Affiliation:
Political Science Department, Perm State University, Perm, Russia
*
*Corresponding author. Email: borisova_nv@psu.ru
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Ethnic territorial autonomy (ETA) is an institutional way to ensure simultaneously the integrity of the state and the rights of ethnic minorities through preferential policies in certain ethnically sensitive spheres. Language preferential policies differ greatly across multilingual ETAs and can be analyzed through the concept of “language territorial regime” (LTR). In this paper, we examine LTRs along two dimensions: (1) the scope of state regulation of language use and (2) the way language rights are perceived and used. The first considers the depth and universality of state regulation of language use – “strong” or “weak.” The second concerns whether the community's approach to language rights is symbolic or pragmatic. The combination of these two dimensions allows the categorization of LTRs into four main classes: “strong parting-regime,” “strong pooling-regime,” “weak pooling-regime,” and “weak parting-regime.” A comparison of South Tyrol, Vojvodina, and Wales allows conceptualizing LTR as a system of de jure institutional arrangements of linguistic issues and practice of self-organization and perpetuation of multilingual communities.

Keywords

language preferential policyethnic territorial autonomylanguage territorial regimemultilingualismethnic minorities
Type
Articles
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 46 , Issue 3 , May 2018 , pp. 358 - 373
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 Association for the Study of Nationalities 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agarin, Timofey. 2014. “Flawed Premises and Unexpected Consequences: Support of Regional Languages in Europe.” Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 20 (3): 349–369.Google Scholar
Alber, Elizabeth, and Palermo, Francesco. 2012. “Creating, Studying and Experimenting Bilingual law in South Tyrol: Lost in Interpretation.” In Bilingual Higher Education in the Legal Context, edited by Arzoz, Xabier, 287–309. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Alber, Elizabeth, and Zwilling, Carolin. 2014. “Continuity and Change in South Tyrol's Ethnic Governance.” In Autonomy Arrangements around the World: A Collection of Well and Lesser Known Cases, edited by Constantin, Levente Sergiu, and Osipov, Alexander, 33–66. Cluj-Napoca: Editura Institutului pentru Studierea Problemelor Minoritărţilor Naţionale.Google Scholar
Alexander, Neville. 1989. Language Policy and National Unity in South Africa/Azania. Cape Town: Buchu.Google Scholar
Belić, Bojan. 2014. “Linguistic Vojvodina: Embordered Frontiers.” In The Multilingual Society Vojvodina: Intersecting Borders, Cultures and Identities, edited by Kamusella, Tomasz and Nomachi, Motoki, 1–24. Sapporo: Hokkaido University.Google Scholar
The Blue Books of 1847. n.d. The National Library of Wales. Accessed September 12, 2015. https://www.llgc.org.uk/en/discover/digital-gallery/printedmaterial/thebluebooks/.Google Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers. 2013. “Language, Religion and the Politics of Difference.” Nations and Nationalism 19 (1): 1–20.Google Scholar
Busch, Brigitta. 2013. “Linguistic Rights and Language Policy: A South-North Dialogue.” Education as Change 17 (2): 209–218.Google Scholar
Cardinal, Linda, and Sonntag, Selma. 2015. “State Traditions and Language Regimes: A Historical Institutionalism Approach to Language Policy.” European and Regional Studies 8 (1): 5–21.Google Scholar
Carla, Andrea. 2007. “Living Apart in the Same Room: Analysis of the Management of Linguistic Diversity in Bolzano.” Ethnopolitics 6 (2): 285–313.Google Scholar
Cederman, Eric-Lars, Hug, Simon, Schädel, Andreas, and Wucherpfenning, Julian. 2015. “'Territorial Autonomy in the Shadow of Conflict: Too Little, Too Late?” American Political Science Review 109 (2): 354–370.Google Scholar
Census Gives Insights into Characteristics of the Population in Wales. 2012. Office for National Statistics. December 11. Accessed September 12, 2015. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20160105160709/http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/mro/news-release/census-21—wales/census-gives-insights-into-characteristics-of-the-population-in-wales.html.Google Scholar
Census of Population, Households and Dwellings in the Republic of Serbia, 2011. 2012. Belgrade: Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia.Google Scholar
“Complex Autonomy Arrangements in Western Europe. A Comparative Analysis of Regional Consociationalism in Brussels, Northern Ireland and South Tyrol.” 2005. In Autonomy, Selfgovernance, and Conflict Resolution: Innovative Approaches to Institutional Design in Divided Societies, edited by Weller, Marc and Wolff, Stefan, 101–136. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
De Witte, Bruno. 2014. “Linguistic Minorities.” In Western Europe: Expansion of Rights Without (Much) Litigation?“ In Rights and Courts in Pursuit of Social Change: Legal Mobilisation in the Multilevel European System, edited by Anagnostou, Dia, 27–52. Oxford: Oxford-Hart.Google Scholar
Delarue, Steven, and Caluwe, Johan De. 2015. “Eliminating Social Inequality by Reinforcing Standard Language Ideology? Language Policy for Dutch in Flemish Schools.” Current Issues in Language Planning 16 (1–2): 8–25.Google Scholar
European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages: Application of the Charter in Serbia. 2016. Strasbourg: Council of Europe. Accessed December 27, 2016. http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/education/minlang/Report/EvaluationReports/SerbiaECRML3_en.pdf.Google Scholar
European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages: Application of the Charter in the United Kingdom. 2014. Strasbourg: Council of Europe. Accessed September 12, 2015. https://www.coe.int/t/dg4/education/minlang/Report/EvaluationReports/UKECRML4_en.pdf.Google Scholar
Gazzola, Michele. 2014. The Evaluation of Language Regimes. Theory and Application to Multilingual Patent Organisations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will. 1993. Politics in the Vernacular. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Laitin, David D. 1993. “The Game Theory of Language Regimes.” International Political Science Review 14 (3): 227–239.Google Scholar
“Languages and Alphabets in the Official Use in the Statutes of Cities and Municipalities of the Autonomous Province of Vojvodina.” Provincial Secretariat for Education, Regulations, Administration and National Minorities – National Communities. September 3, 2014. Accessed September 30, 2015. http://www.puma.vojvodina.gov.rs/mapa.php.Google Scholar
Liu, Amy. 2015. Standardizing Diversity: The Political Economy of Language Regimes. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Liu, Amy. 2016. “Democracy and Minority Language Recognition: Tyranny of the Majority and the Conditional Effects of Group Size.” Democratization 24 (3): 544–565.Google Scholar
McGarry, John, and O'Leary, Brendan. 1993. “Introduction: The Micro Political Regulation of Ethnic Conflicts.” In The Politics of Ethnic Conflicts Regulation: Case Studies of Protracted Ethnic Conflicts, 1–40. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
One Wales: A Progressive Agenda for the Government of Wales. 2007. Accessed September 11, 2015. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/bsp/hi/pdfs/27_06_07_onewales.pdf.Google Scholar
Palermo, Francesco. 2008. “Implementation and Amendment of the Autonomy Statute.” In Tolerance Through Law Self Governance and Group Rights in South Tyrol, edited by Woelk, Jens, Palermo, Francesco, and Marko, Joseph, 143–170. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Patten, Alan. 2001. “Political Theory and Language Policy.” Political Theory 29 (5): 691–715.Google Scholar
Poggeschi, Giovanni. 2012. “The Use of Regional and Minority Languages in the Public Administration and the Undertakings of Article 10 of the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages.” Revista de Llengua i Dret 57:163–205.Google Scholar
Pool, Jonathan. 1990. “Language Regimes and Political Regimes.” In Language Policy and Political Development, edited by Weinstein, B. Norwood, 241–261. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Pool, Jonathan. 1996. “Optimal Language Regimes for the European Union.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language 121 (1): 159–179.Google Scholar
The Population of Serbia. n.d. Accessed April 30, 2016. http://pop-stat.mashke.org/serbia-ethnic2011.htm.Google Scholar
Safran, William. 1994. “Non-separatist Policies Regarding Ethnic Minorities: Positive Approaches and Ambiguous Consequences.” International Political Science Review 15 (1): 61–80.Google Scholar
Sasse, Gwendolyn. 2008. “The Politics of EU Conditionality: The Norm of Minority Protection during and beyond EU Accession.” Journal of European Public Policy 15 (6): 842–860.Google Scholar
Schiffman, Harold. 2002. Linguistic Culture and Language Policy. Abingdon: Taylor and Francis e-Library.Google Scholar
Semenov, Andrei. 2016. “”Politicheskie effekty etnicheskikh territorial'nykh avtonomii: obzor issle-dovanii [Political Effects of Ethnic Territorial Autonomies: Review of Studies].“ Vestnik Permskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia ”Politologija“ 1:127–152.Google Scholar
Spolsky, Bernard. 2004. Language Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Statistisches Jahrbuch für Südtirol. 2014. Annuario statistico della Provincia di Bolzano. Bolzano.Google Scholar
Tolvaisis, Leonas. 2012. “Hungarian Cultural Autonomy in Vojvodina from the 1974 Socialist Constitution to the 2009 Statute of Autonomy: Path Dependence Dynamics against the Reversal of Minority Policies.” Nationalities Papers 40 (1): 63–83.Google Scholar
Vojvodina Basic Facts. 2015. Autonomous Province of Vojvodina. October 19. Accessed April 30, 2016. http://www.vojvodina.gov.rs/en/autonomous-province-vojvodina.Google Scholar
Welsh Language Skills by Local Authority, Gender and Detailed Age Groups, 2011Census. 2011. Accessed September 11, 2015. https://statswales.wales.gov.uk/Catalogue/Welsh-Language/WelshLanguageSkills-by-LocalAuthority-Gender-DetailedAgeGroups-2011Census.Google Scholar
Williams, Colin. 2003. “Language Policy and Planning Issues in Multicultural Societies.” In Linguistic Conflict and Language Laws: Understanding the Quebec Question, edited by Larrivée, Pierre, 1–56. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Williams, Colin. 2013. “Perfidious Hope: The Legislative Turn.” Regional and Federal Studies 23 (1): 101–122.Google Scholar
Wolff, Stefan. 2009. “Complex Power-sharing and the Centrality of Territorial Selfgovernance in Contemporary Conflict Settlements.” Ethnopolitics 8 (1): 27–45.Google Scholar