Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T14:41:18.723Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Republika Srpska as a strong nationalizing state and the consequences for postethnic activism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Heleen Touquet
Heleen Touquet*
Affiliation:
Department of Social Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium
*
*Email: heleen.touquet@soc.kuleuven.be
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper explores the limits and possibilities for postethnic mobilization in Bosnia-Herzegovina. It employs and critically assesses Tarrow's classic concept of political opportunity structure for the explaining the variations in the occurrence of postethnic mobilization in Bosnia-Herzegovina, a deeply divided society. While the main cleavages in the country run along ethnic lines, a number of groups and NGOs attempt to mobilize alternative identities across ethnic boundaries. These groups are mostly based in the Federation entity of Bosnia-Herzegovina and not in the Republika Srpska. My analysis shows that the concept of political opportunity structure only partly explains this difference. I thus suggest an alternative perspective, which takes into account the cultural environment in which the mobilization happens. The first part of the paper expands on the definition of postethnic activism, explaining what it is and how I proceeded in researching postethnic groups in Bosnia-Herzegovina. The second part uses the framework of political opportunity structure for assessing the influence of environmental factors on the emergence and development of postethnic activism. The third part of the paper evaluates the relevance of the political opportunity structure framework, considers the merits of an approach which takes into account the cultural context, and suggests some further avenues for research.

Keywords

Bosnianationalismethnicity
Type
Articles
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 40 , Issue 2 , March 2012 , pp. 203 - 220
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 Association for the Study of Nationalities 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Appiah, Anthony Kwame. The Ethics of Identity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP, 2005. Print.Google Scholar
Armstrong, Elizabeth A., and Bernstein, Mary. “Culture, Power, and Institutions: A Multi-Institutional Politics Approach to Social Movements.” Sociological Theory 26 (2008): 74–99. Print.Google Scholar
Belloni, Roberto. “Civil Society and Peacebuilding in Bosnia and Herzegovina.” Journal of Peace Research 38.2 (2001): 163–80. Print.Google Scholar
Bieber, Florian. Post-War Bosnia: Ethnicity, Inequality and Public Sector Governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2006. Print.Google Scholar
Brockett, Charles. “The Structure of Political Opportunities and Peasant Mobilization in Central America.” Comparative Politics 23.3 (1991): 253–74. Print.Google Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers. Nationalism Reframed: Nationhood and the National Question in the New Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1997. Print.Google Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers, and Cooper, Frederick. “Beyond Identity.” Theory and Society 29 (2000): 1–47. Print.Google Scholar
Chandra, Kanchan. “Ethnic Parties and Democratic Stability.” Perspectives on Politics 3.2 (2005): 235–52. Print.Google Scholar
Džihić, Vedran. Ethnopolitik in Bosnien-Herzegowina Staat und Gesellschaft in der Krise. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2009. Print.Google Scholar
Fischer, Martina, ed. Peacebuilding and Civil Society in Bosnia-Herzegovina – Ten Years after Dayton. 2nd ed. Münster: Lit-Verlag, 2007. Print.Google Scholar
Freedom House. Nations in Transit 2007: Bosnia-Herzegovina. 2007. Web. 4 Jan. 2012.Google Scholar
Gamson, William, and Meyer, David. “Framing political opportunity.” Ed. McAdam, D., McCarthy, J., and Zald, M. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1996. 275–90. Print.Google Scholar
Helsinki Committee for Human Rights in Bosnia-Herzegovina. Report on the Status of Human Rights in Bosnia-Herzegovina January 2008–December 2008. Web. 4 Jan. 2012.Google Scholar
Hollinger, David. Postethnic America: Beyond Multiculturalism. NY: Basic, 1995. Print.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Donald. “The Alternative Vote and Interethnic Moderation: A Reply to Fraenkel and Grofman.” Public Choice 121.3–4 (December 2004): 507–17. Print.Google Scholar
Watch, Human Rights. “Bosnia: Protect Civil Society From Harassment.” 16 July 2008. Web. 12 May 2011.Google Scholar
International Crisis Group. “Bosnia's Alliance for (Smallish) Change.” Europe Report No. 132, 2 Aug. 2002. Web. 4 Jan. 2012.Google Scholar
International Trade Union Confederation. Annual Survey of Trade Union Rights: Bosnia and Herzegovina. 2009. Web. 4 Jan. 2012.Google Scholar
Knezević, Gordana. “With Pale School Opening, Serb Leader Sends Message To Bosnia.” RFERL, 9 Sept. 2009. Web. 4 Jan. 2012.Google Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter. “Political context and opportunity.” Blackwell Companion to Social Movements. Ed. Snow, David A., Soule, Sarah A., and Kriesi, Hanspeter. Oxford: Blackwell, 2007. Print.Google Scholar
Koopmans, Ruud and Kriesi, Hanspeter “Institutional structures and prevailing strategies.” The politics of new social movements in Western Europe. Ed. Kriesi, Hanspeter, Koopmans, Ruud, Duyvendak, Jan-Willem and Giugni, Marco. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1995. Print.Google Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter, Koopmans, Ruud, Duyvendak, Jan-Willem, and Giugni, Marco. The Politics of New Social Movements in Western Europe. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota, 1995. Print.Google Scholar
Latal, Srecko. “Bosnia's Future Depends on Leaders Showing Restraint.” The Guardian, 18 Oct. 2010. Web. 4 Jan. 2012.Google Scholar
Ljubić, Tatjana, and Marko, Davor. “Religion, Nation and State: The ‘Holy Trinity’ of Disunity of Post-Dayton Bosnia-Herzegovina.” State or Nation? The Challenges of Political Transition in Bosnia-Herzegovina. Ed. Sarajlić, Eldar and Marko, Davor. Sarajevo: Center for Interdisciplinary Postgraduate Studies, 2011. Print.Google Scholar
Loza, Tihomir. “Dodik's blunder.” European Voice, 11 July 2008. Web. 4 Jan. 2012. <http://www.europeanvoice.com/article/2008/07/0612/dodik-s-blunder/61683.aspx>..>Google Scholar
Maksić, Adis, and Toal, Gerard. “Is Bosnia-Herzegovina Unsustainable? Implications for the Balkans and European Union.” Eurasian Geography and Economics 52.2 (March-April 2011): 279–93. Print.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug. Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency (1955–1960). Chicago: U of Chicago, 1982. Print.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug, McCarthy, John D., and Zald, Mayer N. Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures and Cultural Framings. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1999. Print.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug, Tarrow, Sidney, and Tilly, Charles. Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2001. Print.Google Scholar
Meyer, David S., and Minkoff, Debra C. “Conceptualizing Political Opportunity.” Social Forces 82.4 (2004): 1457–92. Print.Google Scholar
Mujkić, Asim. We, the Citizens of Ethnopolis Sarajevo. Sarajevo: Centar za Ljudska Prava Univerziteta u Sarajevu, 2008. Print.Google Scholar
Mungiu-Pippidi, Alina, and Krastev, Ivan. Nationalism after Communism: Lessons Learned. Budapest: CEU, 2004. Print.Google Scholar
National Democratic Institute. Bosnia-Herzegovina Democracy Assessment Report. 2009. Web. 4 Jan. 2012.Google Scholar
Opp, Karl-Dieter. Theories of Political Protest and Social Movements. New York: Routledge, 2009. Print.Google Scholar
Osa, Maryjane, and Schock, Kurt. “A Long Hard Slog: Political Opportunities, Social Networks and the Mobilization of Dissent in Non-Democracies.” Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change 27 (2007): 123–53. Print.Google Scholar
Sarajlić, Eldar. “The Bosnian Triangle: Ethnicity, Politics and Citizenship.” CITSEE working paper 2010/06. 2010. Web. 4 Jan. 2012.Google Scholar
Šedo, Jakub. “The Party System of Bosnia and Herzegovina.” Party Politics in the Western Balkans. Ed. Stojarova, Vera and Emerson, Peter. London: Routledge, 2010. Print.Google Scholar
Sejfija, Ismet. Historical Preconditions and Current Development of Civil Associations in BiH. Sarajevo: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, 2008. Print.Google Scholar
Smith, Rogers. Stories of Peoplehood: the Politics and Morals of Political Membership. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2003. Print.Google Scholar
Snow, David. A., and Benford, Robert D. “Ideology, Frame Resonance and Participant Mobilization.” International Social Movement Research 1 (1988): 197–219. Print.Google Scholar
Snow, David A., Soule, Sarah A., and Kriesi, Hanspeter, eds. Blackwell Companion to Social Movements. Oxford: Blackwell, 2007. Print.Google Scholar
Stojarovà, Věra. “Legacy of communist and socialist parties in the Western Balkans.” Party politics in the Western Balkans. Ed. Stojarovà, Věra, and Emerson, Peter London: Routledge, 2011. Print.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney. Power in Movement. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2002. Print.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. From Mobilization to Revolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1978. Print.Google Scholar
UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). The Ties that Bind: Social Capital in Bosnia and Herzegovina. National Human Development Report 2009. NY: United Nations. 2009. Web. 4 Jan. 2012.Google Scholar
US Department of State. 2009 Report on International Religious Freedom. Web. 4 Jan. 2012.Google Scholar
Vuletić, Davor. “Internal Party Democracy in Bosnia-Herzegovina – An Interaction Between Crises and Developments.” Reshaping the Broken Image of Political Parties: Internal Party Democracy in South Eastern Europe. Ed. Karasimeonov, Georgi. Sofia: New Bulgarian U, 2007. Print.Google Scholar
Williams, Rhys H. “The Cultural Contexts of Collective Action: Constraints, Opportunities and the Symbolic Life of Social Movements.” The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements. Ed. Snow, David A., Soule, Sarah A., and Kriesi, Hanspeter. London: Blackwell, 2007. Print.Google Scholar