Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:28:42.144Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Specificity and independence of the literary game

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Bernard Lahire
Bernard Lahire*
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, École normale supérieure de Lyon, France
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In developing his theory of the “literary field,” Pierre Bourdieu essentially had in mind the case of France from the second half of the nineteenth century, the use of which as a case undoubtedly contributed to his marginalizing numerous aspects of the national microcosm. Among its unstated and unrecognized particular qualities, France is mono-national (rather than multinational) and monolingual (rather than multilingual), and occupies the dominant position in the international Francophone world (much as Germany is at the heart of the German-speaking world). A state, a nation, a language, a territory, a literature — all of these make one unit and prevent one from considering situations more complex or tangled, such as those of many minority literatures. These allow the tackling of issues — among others, problems of their “autonomy” in relation to realities outside of literature such as the political, religious, linguistic, and economic. Rather than imposing constraints on a research agenda, the study of minority literatures allows one to shed light on the complex and contradictory relations between the political (the national, the communal, and sometimes the state), the market, and the literary game.

Keywords

minority literaturesliterary gamespecificity and independence of the literary sphere
Type
Special Section: The Autonomy of Minority Literature
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 40 , Issue 3 , May 2012 , pp. 411 - 429
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 Association for the Study of Nationalities 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Apalategui, Ur. “Rossetti's Obsession by Ramon Saizarbitoria: on the Seduction of Minority Literary Fields.” Nationalities Papers (2012): doi 10.1080/00905992.2012.674503. Web.Google Scholar
Bied, Robert. “Le monde des auteurs.” Histoire de l'édition française. Le livre triomphant 1660–1830. Ed. Chattier, Roger and Martin, Henri-Jacques. Paris: Fayard/Cercle de la Librairie, 1990. 775–800. Print.Google Scholar
Boschetti, Anna. “Légitimité littéraire et stratégies editorials.” Histoire de l'édition française. Le livre concurrencé 1900–1950. Ed. Chartier, Roger and Martin, Henri-Jacques. Paris: Fayard/Cercle de la Librairie, 1991. 511–551. Print.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. “Champ intellectuel et projet créateur.” Les Temps modernes 246 (1966): 865–906. Print.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. “Le champ littéraire.” Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 89 (1991): 3–46. Print.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. “Un entretien de Jacques Dubois avec Pierre Bourdieu.” Textyles 15 (1998): 12–16. Print.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. “Existe-t-il une littérature beige? Limites d'un champ et frontières politiques.” Études de lettres 3 (1985): 3–6. Print.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. “The Market of Symbolic Goods.” The Field of Cultural Production. Essays on Art and Literature. Ed. Randall, Jonathan. Cambridge: Polity, 1993. 112–141. Print.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. The Rules of Art. Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field. Trans. Susan Emanuel. UK: Polity and Blackwell, 1996. Print.Google Scholar
Casanova, Pascale. The World Republic of Letters. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP, 2004.Google Scholar
Charlier, Gustave. Les Lettres françaises de Belgique: esquisse historique. Bruxelles: La Renaissance du Livre, 1938. Print.Google Scholar
de Goncourt, Edmond, and de Goncourt, Jules. Journal: Mémoires de la vie littéraire, 1851–1865. Paris: Robert Laffont, 2004. Print.Google Scholar
Federini, Fabienne. Écrire ou combattre. Des intellectuels prennent les armes (1942–1944). Paris: La Découverte, Laboratoire des sciences sociales, 2006. Print.Google Scholar
Flaubert, Gustave. Correspondance. Vol. 2 (July 1851–Dec. 1858). Paris: Gallimard, Bibliothèque de la Pléiade, 1980. Print.Google Scholar
Flaubert, Gustave. Correspondance. Vol. 4 (1869–1875). Paris: Gallimard, Bibliothèque de la Pléiade. Print.Google Scholar
Freidson, Eliot. “Pourquoi l'art ne peut pas ětre une profession?” L'Art de la recherche. Essais en l'honneur de Raymonde Moulin. Ed. Menger, Pierre-Michel and Passeron, Jean-Claude. Paris: La Documentation française, 1994. 119–135. Print.Google Scholar
Freidson, Eliot. “Les professions artistiques comme défi à l'analyse sociologique.” Revue française de sociologie 27 (1986): 431–443. Print.Google Scholar
Genet, Jean-Philippe. “La mesure et les champs culturels.” Histoire & Mesure 2.1 (1987): 137–153. Print.Google Scholar
Goody, Jack. The Logic of Writing and the Organisation of Society. Cambridge: Press Syndicate of the U of Cambridge, 1986. Print.Google Scholar
Goulemot, Jean-Marie, and Oster, Daniel. Gens de lettres, écrivains et bohèmes. L'imaginaire littéraire 1630–1900. Paris: Minerve, 1992. Print.Google Scholar
Lahire, Bernard. “Champ, hors-champ, contrechamp.” Le Travail sociologique de Pierre Bourdieu. Dettes et critiques. Ed. Lahire, Bernard. Paris: Éditions la Découverte, 1998. 23–57. Print.Google Scholar
Lahire, Bernard. La Condition littéraire. La double vie des écrivains. Paris: Éditions la Découverte, Laboratoire des sciences sociales, 2006. Print.Google Scholar
Lahire, Bernard. Franz Kafka. Éléments pour une théorie de la création littéraire. Paris: Éditions la Découverte, Laboratoire des sciences sociales, 2010. Print.Google Scholar
Lahire, Bernard. The Plural Actor. Cambridge: Polity, 2010. Print.Google Scholar
Lahire, Bernard. Portraits sociologiques. Dispositions et variations individuelles. Paris: Nathan, Essais & Recherches, 2002. Print.Google Scholar
Lévy, Clara. Écritures de l'identité. Les écrivains juifs après la Shoah. Paris: PUF, 1998. Print.Google Scholar
Levine, Lawrence W. Highbrow/Lowbrow: The Emergence of Cultural Hierarchy in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP, 1988. Print.Google Scholar
Meyerson, I., “Discontinuités et cheminements autonomes dans l'histoire de l'esprit”, Écrits 1920–1983. Pour une psychologie historique. Paris: PUF, 1987 [1953]. 53–65. Print.Google Scholar
Popa, Ioana. La Politique extérieure de la littérature. Une sociologie de la traduction des littératures d'Europe de l'Est (1947–1989). Diss., Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, Paris, 2004. Print.Google Scholar
Pouessel, Stéphanie. “Writing as Resistance: Berber Literature and the Challenges Surrounding the Emergence of a Berber Literary Field in Morocco.” Nationalities Papers (2012): doi 10.1080/00905992.2012.674015. Web.Google Scholar
Riaux, Gilles. “Literatures at the Intersections of National Territories: Iranian-Azerbaijani Ethnic Entrepreneurs in a Transnational Historical Space.” Nationalities Papers (2012): doi 10.1080/00905992.2012.674013. Web.Google Scholar
Saint-Jacques, Denis, and Viala, Alain. “À propos du champ littéraire. Histoire, géographie, histoire littéraire.” Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales 2 (1994): 395–406. Print.Google Scholar
Sartre, Jean-Paul. The Family Idiot: Gustave Flaubert, 1821–1857. 5 vols. Trans. Carol Cosman. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1981–1994. Print.Google Scholar
Scalbert-Yücel, Clémence. “Emergence and equivocal autonomization of a Kurdish literary field in Turkey.” Nationalities Papers (2012): doi 10.1080/00905992.2012.674014. Web.Google Scholar
Seigel, Jerrold E. 1986. Bohemian Paris: Culture, Politics, and the Boundaries of Bourgeois Life, 1830–1930. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1999. Print.Google Scholar
Thérenty, Marie-Eve. Mosaïques. Ětre écrivain entre presse et roman (1829–1836). Paris: Honoré Champion, 2003. Print.Google Scholar
Valéry, Paul. Œuvres. Vol. 1. Paris: Gallimard, Bibliothèque de la Pléiade, 1957. Print.Google Scholar
Viala, Alain. “Ah, qu'elle était jolie…” Politix 5.17 (1992): 125–141. Print.Google Scholar
Viala, Alain. Naissance de l'écrivain. Sociologie de la littérature à l'ăge classique. Paris: Minuit. 1985. Print.Google Scholar
Weber, M., Essais sur la théorie de la science. Paris: Presses Pocket, Agora, 1992. Print.Google Scholar
Zola, Émile. 1880. Le Roman expérimental. Paris: Garnier-Flammarion, 1971. Print.Google Scholar