No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Editor's introduction: Class and politics
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 March 2015
Extract
Social classes are fading away. They are fading away as forms of identity with which groups associate themselves; they are fading away as anchors of social movements; and they are fading away as objects of study from social scientists' agenda. This was the shared opinion of one of our Editorial Board meetings in 2009. Not having much power to intervene on the first two accounts, we decided that we still could do something about bringing social class back onto the agenda of social scientists. We could organize a conference and invite scholars to share their work on social classes or to rethink their work through the prism of social class. Hence a conference entitled “Urban Classes and Politics in the Neoliberal Era: Turkey in Comparison” was held in October 2010. The objective was to instigate a scholarly debate on social classes in urban Turkey, in comparison to other regions such as South Asia and Latin America.
- Type
- Dossier on Urban Classes and Politics in the Neoliberal Era: Turkey in Comparison
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © New Perspectives on Turkey 2011
References
Barry, Andrew, Thomas, Osborne, and Nikolas, Rose. Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neo Liberalism, and the Rationalities of Government: Routledge, 1996.Google Scholar
Brown, Wendy. “Wounded Attachments.” Political Theory 21, no. 3 (1993): 390–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burchell, Graham, Colin, Cordon, and Peter, Miller, eds. The Foucault Effect: Studies in Covernmentality. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donzelot, Jacques, and Colin, Cordon. “Interview: Governing Liberal Societies – the Foucault Effect in the English-Speaking World.” Foucault Studies, no. 5 (2008): 48–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel. The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France 1978–1979. Translated by Graham Burchell: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. “From Redistribution to Recognition? Dilemmas of Justice in a ‘Post-Socialist Age.’” New Left Review, no. 212 (1995): 68–93.Google Scholar
Gane, Mike. “Foucault on Govermentality and Liberalism.” Theory, Culture & Society 25, no. 7–8 (2008): 353–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Colin. “Questions, Ethos, Event: Foucault on Kant and Enlightenment.” In Foucault’s New Domains, edited by Mike, Gane and Terry, Johnson, 19–35: Routledge, 1993.Google Scholar
Isin, Engin F. “The Neurotic Citizen.” Citizenship Studies 8, no. 3 (2004): 217–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemke, Thomas. “The Birth of Bio-Polities’: Michel Foucault’s Lecture at the Collège de France on Neo-Liberal Governmentality.” Economy and Society 30, no. 2 (2001): 190–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madra, Yahya, and Ceren, özselçuk. “Jouissance and Antagonism in the Forms of the Commune: A Critique of Biopolitical Subjectivity.” Rethinking Marxism 22, no. 3 (2010): 481–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ong, Aihwa. Neoliberalism as Exception: Mutations in Citizenship and Sovereignty. Durham: Duke University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Robinson, William I.Latin America and Global Capitalism. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, Nikolas. The Politics of Life Itself: Biomedicine, Power, and Subjectivity in the Twenty-First Century. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Žižek, Slavoj. “Class Struggle or Postmodernism? Yes, Please!” In Contingency, Hegemony, Universality: Contemporary Dialogues on the Left, edited by Judith, Butler, Ernesto, Laclau and Žižek, Slavoj, 90–135, 2000.Google Scholar