Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:23:55.077Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Paragrammatism in Finnish

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2008

Pirkko Kukkonen
Pirkko Kukkonen
Affiliation:
Department of General Linguistics, PO Box 4, SF-00014University of Helsinki, Finland
Get access

Abstract

Previous studies on the nature of paragrammatism in Finnish have established a continuum of syntactic complexity with normal speech at one end and Broca's aphasics at the other, while Wernicke's aphasics fall between these two groups. In the present analysis, two paragrammatic aphasics are described whose utterances are longer than normal and of a more complex syntactic structure than the utterances in the comparison data. The paragrammatic subjects also make plenty of morphological and syntactic errors. The comparison of the present results with earlier studies on paragrammatism in Finnish shows that paragrammatism is subject to considerable variation

Type
Research Article
Information
Nordic Journal of Linguistics , Volume 16 , Special Issue 2: Special issue on NEUROLINGUISTICS , December 1993 , pp. 123 - 135
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Badecker, W. & Caramazza, A. 1985. On Considerations of Method and Theory Governing the Use of Clinical Categories in Neurolinguistics and Cognitive Neuropsychology: The Case against Agrammatism. Cognition 20, 97–125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bates, E., Wulfeck, B. & MacWhinney, B. 1991. Cross-Linguistic Research in Aphasia: An Overview. Brain and Language 41, 123–148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butterworth, B. & Howard, D. 1987. Paragrammatisms. Cognition 26, 1–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caplan, D. 1986. In Defence of Agrammatism. Cognition 24, 263–276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caplan, D. 1987. Neurolinguistics and Linguistic Aphasiology. Cambridge Studies in Speech Science and Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De, Bleser R.. 1987. From Agrammatism to Paragrammatism: German Aphasiological Traditions and Grammaaatical Disturbances. Cognitive Neuropsychology 4, 187–256.Google Scholar
Gleason, J., Goodglass, H., Obler, L., Green, E., Hyde, M. & Weintraub, S. 1980. Narrative Strategies of Aphasics and Normal-Speaking Subjects. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 23, 370–382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodglass, H., & Kapalan, E. 1983. The Assessment of Aphasia and Related Disorders. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger.Google Scholar
Goodglass, H., & Menn, L. 1985. Is Agrammatism a Unitary phenomenon? In Kean, M. L. (ed.) pp. 1–26.Google Scholar
Hakulinen, A., Karlsson, F. & Vilkuna, M. 1980. Suomen tekstilauseiden piirteitä: kuantitatiivinen tutkimus. Publications of the Department of General Linguistics, University of Helsinki. No. 6. Helsinki.Google Scholar
Heeschen, C., 1985. Agrammatism versus Paragrammatism: A Fictitious Opposition. In Kean, M. L. (ed.), pp. 207–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kean, M. L., (ed.) 1985. Agrammatism. Orlando, Fl.: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kukkonen, P., 1990. Patterns of Phonological Disturbances in Adult Aphasia. Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seuran Toimituksia 259. Mänttä: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.Google Scholar
Kukkonen, P., 1993. (Ms). Grammatical Complexity in Normal and Aphasic Speech.Google Scholar
Niemi, J., 1990a. Nonlexical Grammatical Deviations in “Paragrammatic” Aphasia. Folia Linguistica.XXIV: 389–404.Google Scholar
Niemi, J., 1990b. Lexicality of a Sub-Type of Morphological Errors in Aphasia. In Niemi, J. & Koivuselkä-Sallinen, P.. Joensuu Papers in Neuropsychology and Neurolinguistics 3: 1–26. Studies in Languages No. 19. University of Joensuu, Faculty of Arts.Google Scholar
Niemi, J., Koivuselkä-Sallinen, P. & Laine, M. 1990. Quantitative Analysis of Syntax and Inflectional Morphology in Aphasia. In Niemi, J. & Koivuselkä-Sallinen, P. (eds.), Joensuu Papers in Neuropsychology and Neurolinguistics. 3, 27–76. Studies in Languages No. 19 University of Joensuu, Faculty of Arts..Google Scholar
Niemi, J., Laine, M., Hänninen, R. & Koivuselkä-Sallinen, P. 1990. Agrammatism in Finnish: Two Case Studies. In Menn, L. & Obler, L. K. (eds.), Agrammatic Aphasia: A Cross-Language Narrative Sourcebook. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 1013–1085.Google Scholar
Paradis, M., 1987. The Assessment of Bilingual Aphasia. Hillsdale, N.J & London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Roitto, M., 1990. Kielellinen suoriutuminen normaalisti ikääntyneillä suomenkielisillä. Progradu thesis, University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Saffran, E.M., Schwartz, M. F. & Marin, O. S. 1980. Evidence from Aphasia: Isolating the Components of a production Model. In Butterworth, B. (ed.), Language Production Vol. 1: Speech and Talk. London: Academic Press, pp. 221–241.Google Scholar
Saukkonen, P., 1984. Mistä tyyli syntyy?. Juva: Werner Söderström.Google Scholar
Tissot, R. J., Mounin, G. & Lhermitte, F. 1973. L' agrammatisme. Brussels: Dessart.Google Scholar