We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
Ball, Eldon V. “Output, Input, and Productivity Measurement in U.S. Agriculture, 1948–79,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics (1985):475–486.Google Scholar
Bergstrom, J. C., Dillman, B. L., and Stoll, J. R.Public Environmental Amenity Benefits of Private Land: The Case or Prime Agricultural Land. Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics17:139–147, 1985.Google Scholar
Christensen, L. and Jorgenson, D. “U.S. Real Product and Real Factor Input, 1929–1967.” Rev. Income and Wealth16 (1970):19–50.Google Scholar
Drake, L.The Value of Preserving the Agricultural Landscape. (unpublished manuscript) Department of Economics Working Paper, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden, 1987.Google Scholar
Halstead, J. M. “Measuring the Nonmarket Value of Massachusetts Agricultural Land: A Case Study.” Journal of the Northeast Agricultural Economics Council13:12–19.Google Scholar
Maddalla, G. S.Limited-dependent Variable in Econometrics, Cambridge University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
McFadden, D. “Econometric Models of Probabilistic Choice,” in Manski, C. and McFadden, D. (eds.) Structural Analysis of Discrete Data: With Econometric Applications, M. T. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1982.Google Scholar
Shumway, C. R. and Alexander, W. P. “Agricultural Product Supplies and Input Demands: Regional Comparisons,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics70(1) Feb. 1988, 153–161.Google Scholar
Weaver, Robert D. “Theory and Measurement of Provisional Agricultural Production Decisions,” unpublished , University of Wisconsin, 1977.Google Scholar
Weaver, Robert D. “Survey of Promising Developments in Supply Response: Pre- and Post-Data Econometric Methods for Integration of Neo-Classical Theory with Sample Evidence,” Staff Paper No. 18, The Pennsylvania State University, June 1979.Google Scholar
Weaver, Robert D. “Specification and Estimation of Consistent Sets of Choice Functions,” Chapter 6, in New Frontiers in Econometric Modeling and Forecasting, ed. Rausser, Gordon, North Holland: Contributions to Economic Analysis, 1982.Google Scholar
Weaver, Robert D. “Multiple Input, Multiple Output Production Choices and Technology in the U.S. Wheat Region,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics65(1):45–56, 1983.Google Scholar
Weaver, Robert D. “Sale of Farmland Conservation Easements: Pennsylvania's Purchase of Development Right Program.” Staff Paper No. 165, The Pennsylvania State University, July 1989.Google Scholar
Weaver, Robert D. and Stefanou, Spiro. “Toward a Behavioral Approach to Modelling Dynamic Production Choice Structures,” Journal of the Northeast Agricultural Economics Council, 1984.Google Scholar
Weaver, Robert D. and Banerjee, A. “Does Futures Trading Destabilize Cash Prices? Evidence from the U.S. Live Beef Cattle Case,” forthcoming Journal of Futures Markets, 1989.Google Scholar