Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:33:19.065Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evidence of carnivore gnawing on Pleistocene and Recent mammalian bones

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2016

Gary Haynes
Gary Haynes*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20560
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Based on inspection of gnawing damage done to bones of modern prey animals, sets of typical damage types or patterns are recognized for certain elements. The presence of these damage patterns suggests carnivore activity even when bones exhibit no identifiable tooth marks or other obvious sign of gnawing. Observations are made of these damage types on bones of Pleistocene and Recent North American mammals, including Bison, proboscidean, Alces, Equus, Cervus, and Rangifer. Damage to the following elements is briefly described: antlers, vertebrae, scapulae, humeri, ulnae, radii, femora, tibiae, metapodials, and innominates.

Type
Articles
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 6 , Issue 3 , Summer 1980 , pp. 341 - 351
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Behrensmeyer, A. K. 1978. Taphonomic and ecologic information from bone weathering. Paleobiology. 4:150–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonnichsen, R. 1973. Some operational aspects of human and animal bone alteration. In: Gilbert, B. M. ed. Mammalian Osteo-Archeology: North America. 337 pp. Missouri Archeological Society; Columbia, Missouri.Google Scholar
Bonnichsen, R. 1979. Pleistocene Bone Technology in the Beringian Refugium. 297 pp. Nat. Mus. Man Merc. Ser. Archaeological Surv. Canada Paper No. 89, Ottawa.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brothwell, D. R. 1976. Further evidence of bone chewing by ungulates: the sheep of North Ronaldsay, Orkney. J. Archaeol. Sci. 3:179–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geist, O. W.No date. Scientific investigations in the Old Crow and Porcupine River regions of Alaska and Yukon Territory, 1952-1953. Unpublished manuscript report, Univ. Alaska Library.Google Scholar
Haynes, G. 1978. Morphological damage and alteration to bone: laboratory experiments, field studies, and zoo studies. Abstracts of the fifth biennial meeting, Am. Quaternary Assoc. Edmonton, Alberta:210.Google Scholar
Haynes, G.In Press a. Taphonomic studies in North America: Analogues for paleoecology. Abstracts of the sixth biennial meeting, Am. Quaternary Assoc. Orono, Maine.Google Scholar
Haynes, G.In Press b. Prey bones and predators: potential ecologic information from the analysis of bone sites. Ossa 7.Google Scholar
Hill, A. P. 1975. Taphonomy of contemporary and Late Cenozoic east African vertebrates. 331 pp. Unpubl. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. London.Google Scholar
Hill, A. P. 1976. On carnivore and weathering damage to bones. Curr. Anthropol. 17:335–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelsall, J. P. 1957. Continued Barren-Ground caribou studies. Wildlife Management Bulletin Series 1, Number 12. Canadian Wildlife Service. Ottawa.Google Scholar
Kuyt, E. 1972. Food habits and ecology of wolves on Barren-Ground caribou range in the Northwest Territories. 36 pp. Canadian Wildlife Service Report Series 21. Ottawa.Google Scholar
Larsen, H. 1968. Trail Creek: Final report on the excavation of two caves on Seward Peninsula, Alaska. 79 pp. Acta Arctica Fasc. XV: Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Mech, L. D. 1966. The Wolves of Isle Royale. 210 pp. U.S. Dept. of Interior, Nat. Park Service Fauna Series 7. Washington D.C.Google Scholar
Mech, L. D. and Frenzel, L. D., eds. 1971. Ecological studies of the Timber Wolf in northeastern Minnesota. 62 pp. U.S.D.A. Forest Service Research Paper No. 52. St. Paul, Minn.Google Scholar
Miller, G. J. 1969. A study of cuts, grooves, and other marks on recent and fossil bone, I: Animal tooth marks. Tebiwa. 12:20–26.Google Scholar
Miller, G. J. 1975. A study of cuts, grooves, and other marks on recent and fossil bone, II: Weathering cracks, fractures, splinters, and other similar natural phenomena. In: Swanson, E. W., ed. Lithic Technology: Making and Using Stone Tools. Aldine; Chicago.Google Scholar
Péwé, T. L. 1975. Quaternary Geology of Alaska. 145 pp. U.S. Geol. Survey Professional Paper 835. Washington, D.C.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanford, D. 1979. The Selby and Dutton sites: evidence for a possible pre-Clovis occupation of the High Plains. In: Humphrey, R. L. and Stanford, D., eds. Pre-Llano Cultures of the Americas: Paradoxes and Possibilities. Pp. 101–123. Anthropol. Soc. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Sutcliffe, A. J. 1970. Spotted hyaena: Crusher, gnawer, digester and collector of bones. Nature. 227:1110–1113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sutcliffe, A. J. 1973. Similarity of bones and antlers gnawed by deer to human artefacts. Nature. 246:428–430.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sutcliffe, A. J. 1977. Further notes on bones and antlers chewed by deer and other ungulates. Deer. 4:73–82.Google Scholar