Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T02:35:06.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Specialization and evolutionary longevity in the Arthropoda

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2016

Karl W. Flessa
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Space Sciences, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, New York 11794
Kenneth V. Powers
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Space Sciences, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, New York 11794
John L. Cisne
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14850

Abstract

The phenomenon of selective biotic extinction is commonly explained as the result of the extinction of specialized organisms and the survival of generalized organisms during a time of environmental stress. Using 48 orders of aquatic free-living arthropods, we test the hypothesis that generalized organisms tend to have longer geologic ranges than specialized organisms. The degree of specialization, as expressed through morphological complexity, is measured by the diversity of limb pairs on the arthropod body. The resulting “tagmosis value” reflects the functional differentiation of limb pairs to perform specific tasks and thus may estimate ecological specialization. No statistically significant correlation exists between an order's typical degree of morphological specialization and its geologic range. Degree of specialization is not an important determinant of evolutionary persistence at this taxonomic level. Evolutionary longevity may depend on the adaptive type (e.g., trophic role, relationship to substrate, etc.) represented by the taxon and on the assortment of these adaptive types.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bretsky, P. W., and Lorenz, D. M. 1970. An essay on genetic-adaptive strategies and mass extinctions. Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull. 81:22492456.Google Scholar
Brillouin, L. 1962. Science and Information Theory. 351 pp. Academic Press. London.Google Scholar
Cifelli, R. 1969. Radiation of Cenozoic planktonic foraminifera. Syst. Zool. 18:154168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cisne, J. L. 1974. Trilobites and the origin of arthropods. Science. 186:1318.Google Scholar
Cisne, J. L. 1975. Evolution of the world fauna of aquatic free-living arthropods. Evolution. 22:337366.Google Scholar
Elton, C. 1927. Animal Ecology. 207 pp. Sidgwick and Jackson. London.Google Scholar
Flessa, K. W., and Imbrie, J. 1973. Evolutionary pulsations: evidence from Phanerozoic diversity patterns. In, Tarling, D. H. and Runcorn, S. K., (eds.), Implications of Continental Drift to the Earth Sciences, vol. 1. Academic Press. London and New York, p. 247285.Google Scholar
Fuller, R. Buckminster. 1970. I Seem to be a Verb. 192 pp. Bantam. New York.Google Scholar
Gatlin, L. L. 1972. Information Theory and the Living System. 210 pp. Columbia Univ. Press. New York.Google Scholar
Green, R. H. 1971. A multivariate statistical approach to the Hutchinsonian niche: bivalve molluscs of central Canada. Ecology. 52:543556.Google Scholar
Harland, W. B.et al., eds. 1964. The Phanerozoic Time Scale. 458 pp. The Geological Society, London.Google Scholar
Harland, W. B.et al., eds. 1967. The Fossil Record. 828 pp. The Geological Society, London.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. E. 1958. Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 22:415427.Google Scholar
Hutson, W., Be, A. W. H., and Lott, L. 1973. Hutchinsonian niche analysis and its application to Indian Ocean planktonic foraminifera. Geol. Soc. Amer. Abstracts with Programs. 7:678.Google Scholar
Lankester, E. R. 1904. The structure and classification of the Arthropoda. Quart. Jour. Micr. Soc. 47:523582.Google Scholar
Levinton, J. S. 1974. Trophic group and evolution in bivalve molluscs. Palaeontology. 17:579585.Google Scholar
Moore, R. C., ed. 1955. Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Part P, Arthropoda 2. 181 pp. Univ. Kansas and Geol. Soc. Amer. Lawrence, Kansas.Google Scholar
Moore, R. C., ed. 1959. Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Part O, Arthropoda 1. 560 pp. Univ. Kansas and Geol. Soc. Amer. Lawrence, Kansas.Google Scholar
Moore, R. C., ed. 1969. Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Part R, Arthropoda 4. 651 pp. Univ. Kansas and Geol. Soc. Amer. Lawrence, Kansas.Google Scholar
Newell, N. D. 1967. Revolutions in the history of life. Geol. Soc. Amer. Spec. Paper. 89:6391.Google Scholar
Pielou, E. C. 1967. The use of information theory in the study of the diversity of biological populations. Fifth Berkeley Symp. on Math. Stat. and Prob. 4:163177.Google Scholar
Raup, D. M. 1972. Taxonomic diversity during the Phanerozoic. Science. 177:10651071.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanders, H. L. 1963. The Cephalocarida. Mem. Connecticut Acad. Sci. 15:180.Google Scholar
Schram, F. R. 1969. The stratigraphic distribution of the Paleozoic Eumalacostraca. Fieldiana Geology. 12:213234.Google Scholar
Simpson, G. G. 1953. The Major Features of Evolution. 434 pp. Columbia Univ. Press. New York.Google Scholar
Stanley, S. M. 1973. Effects of competition on rates of evolution, with special reference to bivalve molluscs and mammals. Syst. Zool. 22:486506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valentine, J. W. 1969. Patterns of taxonomic and ecologic structure of the shelf benthos during Phanerozoic time. Palaeontology. 12:684709.Google Scholar
Valentine, J. W. 1971. Resource supply and species diversity patterns. Lethaia. 4:5162.Google Scholar
Valentine, J. W. 1973. Evolutionary Paleoecology of the Marine Biosphere. 511 pp. Prentice-Hall. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.Google Scholar
Von Bertalanffy, L. 1968. General System Theory. 295 pp. George Braziller. New York.Google Scholar