Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T11:36:33.677Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of the impact of 2 years of a dosing intervention on canine echinococcosis in the Alay Valley, Kyrgyzstan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 June 2017

F. VAN KESTEREN Open the ORCID record for F. VAN KESTEREN [Opens in a new window] ,
A. MASTIN ,
P. R. TORGERSON ,
BERMET MYTYNOVA  and
P. S. CRAIG
F. VAN KESTEREN*
Affiliation:
Cestode Zoonoses Research Group, School of Environment and Life Sciences, University of Salford, M5 4WT Salford, UK Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, 530 Church Street Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
A. MASTIN
Affiliation:
Cestode Zoonoses Research Group, School of Environment and Life Sciences, University of Salford, M5 4WT Salford, UK
P. R. TORGERSON
Affiliation:
Section of Veterinary Epidemiology, University of Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 266a, CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland
BERMET MYTYNOVA
Affiliation:
Kyrgyz Veterinary Research Institute, Togolok Moldo 60, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan
P. S. CRAIG
Affiliation:
Cestode Zoonoses Research Group, School of Environment and Life Sciences, University of Salford, M5 4WT Salford, UK
*
*Corresponding author: Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, 530 Church Street Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. E-mail: freyavankesteren@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Echinococcosis is a re-emerging zoonotic disease in Kyrgyzstan. In 2012, an echinococcosis control scheme was started that included dosing owned dogs in the Alay Valley, Kyrgyzstan with praziquantel. Control programmes require large investments of money and resources; as such it is important to evaluate how well these are meeting their targets. However, problems associated with echinococcosis control schemes include remoteness and semi-nomadic customs of affected communities, and lack of resources. These same problems apply to control scheme evaluations, and quick and easy assessment tools are highly desirable. Lot quality assurance sampling was used to assess the impact of approximately 2 years of echinococcosis control in the Alay valley. A pre-intervention coproELISA prevalence was established, and a 75% threshold for dosing compliance was set based on previous studies. Ten communities were visited in 2013 and 2014, with 18–21 dogs sampled per community, and questionnaires administered to dog owners. After 21 months of control efforts, 8/10 communities showed evidence of reaching the 75% praziquantel dosing target, although only 3/10 showed evidence of a reduction in coproELISA prevalence. This is understandable, since years of sustained control are required to effectively control echinococcosis, and efforts in the Alay valley should be and are being continued.

Keywords

Echinococcuscontrol programmeLot Quality Assurance Sampling (LQAS)Kyrgyzstan
Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 144 , Issue 10 , September 2017 , pp. 1328 - 1337
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allan, J. C. and Craig, P. S. (2006). Coproantigens in taeniasis and echinococcosis. Parasitology International 55, S75–S80.Google Scholar
Allan, J. C., Craig, P. S., Garcia Noval, J., Mencos, F., Liu, D., Wang, Y., Wen, H., Zhou, P., Stringer, R., Rogan, M. T. and Zeyhle, E. (1992). Coproantigen detection for immunodiagnosis of echinococcosis and taeniasis in dogs and humans. Parasitology 104, 347–355.Google Scholar
Alvares Rojas, C. A., Romig, T. and Lightowlers, M. W. (2014). Echinococcus granulosus sensu lato genotypes infecting humans – review of current knowledge. International Journal for Parasitology 44, 9–18.Google Scholar
Benner, C., Carabin, H., Sánchez-Serrano, L. P., Budke, C. M. and Carmena, D. (2010). Analysis of the economic impact of cystic echinococcosis in Spain. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 88, 49–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bobek, B. (1969). Survival, turnover and production of small rodents in a beech forest. Acta Theriologica 14, 191–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, P. S. and Larrieu, E. (2006). Control of cystic echinococcosis/hydatidosis: 1863–2002. Advances in Parasitology 61, 443–508.Google Scholar
Craig, P. S., Gasser, R. B., Parada, L., Cabrera, P., Parietti, S., Borgues, C., Acuttis, A., Agulla, J., Snowden, K. and Paolillo, E. (1995). Diagnosis of canine echinococcosis: comparison of coproantigen and serum antibody tests with arecoline purgation in Uruguay. Veterinary Parasitology 56, 293–301.Google Scholar
Craig, P. S., Budke, C., Schantz, P. M., Li, T., Qiu, J., Yang, Y., Zehyle, E., Rogan, M. T. and Ito, A. (2007). Human echinococcosis – a neglected disease? Tropical Medicine and Health 35, 283–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, P. S., Mastin, A., van Kesteren, F. and Boufana, B. (2015). Echinococcus granulosus: epidemiology and state-of-the-art of diagnostics in animals. Veterinary Parasitology 213, 132–148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Devevey, G. and Christe, P. (2009). Flea infestation reduces the life span of the common vole. Parasitology 136, 1351–1355.Google Scholar
Dodge, H. F. and Romig, H. G. (1929). A method of sampling inspection. The Bell System Technical Journal 8, 613–631.Google Scholar
Eckert, J. and Deplazes, P. (2004). Biological, epidemiological, and clinical aspects of echinococcosis, a zoonosis of increasing concern. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 17, 107–135.Google Scholar
Fujikura, T. (1991). Growing importance of prevention and control of alveolar echinococcosis. World Health Forum 12, 146–150.Google Scholar
Gardner, I. A. and Greiner, M. (2006). Receiver-operating characteristic curves and likelihood ratios: improvements over traditional methods for the evaluation and application of veterinary clinical pathology tests. Veterinary Clinical Pathology 35, 8–17.Google Scholar
Gemmell, M. A., Lawson, J. R. and Roberts, M. G. (1986). Control of echinococcosis/hydatidosis: present status of worldwide progress. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 64, 333–339.Google Scholar
Lembo, T., Craig, P. S., Miles, M. A., Hampson, K. R. and Meslin, F. X. (2013). Zoonoses prevention, control, and elimination in dogs. In Dogs, Zoonoses and Public Health (ed. Macpherson, C. N. L., Meslin, F. X. and Wandeler, A. I.), pp. 205–259. CABI, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Lemeshow, S. and Taber, S. (1991). Lot quality assurance sampling: single and double sampling plans. World Health Statistics Quarterly 44, 115–132.Google Scholar
Mastin, A. (2015). Canine echinococcosis in Kyrgyzstan: detection, diagnosis, and dynamics. Ph.D. School of Environment and Life Sciences. University of Salford, Salford, UK.Google Scholar
Mastin, A., van Kesteren, F., Torgerson, P. R., Ziadinov, I., Mytynova, B., Rogan, M. T., Tursunov, T. and Craig, P. S. (2015). Risk factors for Echinococcus coproantigen positivity in dogs from the Alay valley, Kyrgyzstan. Journal of Helminthology 89, 655–663.Google Scholar
Moro, P. and Schantz, P. M. (2009). Echinococcosis: a review. International Journal of Infectious Diseases 13, 125–133.Google Scholar
Moss, J. E., Chen, X., Li, T., Qiu, J., Wang, Q., Giraudoux, P., Ito, A., Torgerson, P. R. and Craig, P. S. (2013). Reinfection studies of canine echinococcosis and role of dogs in transmission of Echinococcus multilocularis in Tibetan communities, Sichuan, China. Parasitology 140, 1685–1692.Google Scholar
Pierangeli, N. B., Soriano, S. V., Roccia, I., Bergagna, H. F. J., Lazzarini, L. E., Celescinco, A., Kossman, A. V., Saiz, M. S. and Basualdo, J. A. (2010). Usefulness and validation of a coproantigen test for dog echinococcosis screening in the consolidation phase of hydatid control in Neuquén, Argentina. Parasitology International 59, 394–399.Google Scholar
Raimkylov, K. M., Kuttubaev, O. T. and Toigombaeva, V. S. (2015). Epidemiological analysis of the distribution of cystic and alveolar echinococcosis in Osh Oblast in the Kyrgyz Republic, 2000–2013. Journal of Helminthology 89, 651–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, S. E. and Valadez, J. J. (2006). Global review of health care surveys using lot quality assurance sampling (LQAS), 1984–2004. Social Science and Medicine 63, 1648–1660.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schantz, P. M. (1997). Sources and use of surveillance data for cystic echinococcosis. In Compendium on Cystic Echinococcosis in Africa and in Middle Eastern Countries with Special Reference to Morocco (ed. Andersen, F. L., Ouhelli, H. and Kachani, M.), pp. 72–84. Brigham Young University Print Services, Provo, Utah, USA.Google Scholar
Schantz, P. M., Chai, J. J., Craig, P. S., Eckert, J., Jenkins, D. J., Macpherson, C. N. L. and Thakur, A. (1995). Epidemiology and control of hydatid disease. In Echinococcus and Hydatid Disease (ed. Thompson, R. C. A. and Lymbery, A. J.), pp. 233–331. Cab International, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK.Google Scholar
Schantz, P. M., Wang, H., Qiu, J., Liu, F. J., Saito, E., Emshoff, A., Ito, A., Roberts, J. M. and Delker, C. (2003). Echinococcosis on the Tibetan Plateau: prevalence and risk factors for cystic and alveolar echinococcosis in Tibetan populations in Qinghai Province, China. Parasitology 127, S109–S120.Google Scholar
Torgerson, P. R. (2003). The use of mathematical models to simulate control options for echinococcosis. Acta Tropica 85, 211–221.Google Scholar
Torgerson, P. R. (2013). The emergence of echinococcosis in central Asia. Parasitology 140, 1667–1673.Google Scholar
Torgerson, P. R. and Heath, D. D. (2003). Transmission dynamics and control options for Echinococcus granulosus . Parasitology 127, 143–158.Google Scholar
Torgerson, P. R., Karaeva, R. R., Corkeri, N., Abdyjaparov, T. A., Kuttubaev, O. T. and Shaikenov, B. S. (2003). Human cystic echinococcosis in Kyrgyzstan: an epidemiological study. Acta Tropica 85, 51–61.Google Scholar
Torgerson, P. R., Oguljahan, B., Muminov, A. E., Karaeva, R. R., Kuttubaev, O. T., Aminjanov, M. and Shaikenov, B. (2006). Present situation of cystic echinococcosis in Central Asia. Parasitology International 55, S207–S212.Google Scholar
Usubalieva, J., Minbaeva, G., Ziadinov, I., Deplazes, P. and Torgerson, P. R. (2013). Human alveolar echinococcosis in Kyrgyzstan. Emerging Infectious Diseases 19, 1095–1097.Google Scholar
Valadez, J. J., Weiss, W., Leburg, C. and Davis, R. (2002). Assessing community health programs; a participant's manual and workbook. Using LQAS for baseline surveys and regular monitoring. http://www.coregroup.org/storage/documents/LQAS/Assessing_Community_Health_Programs_A_Participants_Manual_and_Workbook.pdf Google Scholar
van Kesteren, F., Mastin, A., Mytynova, B., Ziadinov, I., Boufana, B., Torgerson, P. R., Rogan, M. T. and Craig, P. S. (2013). Dog ownership, dog behaviour and transmission of Echinococcus spp. in the Alay Valley, southern Kyrgyzstan. Parasitology 140, 1674–1684.Google Scholar
van Kesteren, F., Qi, X., Tao, J., Feng, X., Mastin, A., Craig, P. S., Vuitton, D. A., Duan, X., Chu, X., Zhu, J. and Hao, W. (2015). Independent evaluation of a canine echinococcosis control programme in Hobukesar County, Xinjiang, China. Acta Tropica 145, 1–7.Google Scholar
WHO (2010). The Control of Neglected Zoonotic Diseases. Report of the third conference organized with ICONZ, DFID-RIU, Gates Foundation, SOS, EU, TDR and FAO with the participation of ILRI and OIE. A. Shaw. World Health Organization headquarters, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
WHO (2011). Report of the WHO Informal Working Group on cystic and alveolar echinococcosis surveillance, prevention and control, with the participation of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and the World Organisation for Animal Health. WHO/HTM/NTD/NZD/2011·2. Department of Control of Neglected Tropical Diseases, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
WHO/OIE (2001). WHO/OIE Manual on Echinococcosis in Humans and Animals: a Public Health Problem of Global Concern. ed. Eckert, J., Gemmell, M. A., Meslin, F. X. and Pawłowski, Z. S. World Health Organization/World Organisation for Animal Health, Paris, France.Google Scholar
World Bank (2010). Kyrgyz Republic EU special facility support to animal health and feeding. Report No.: AB5562. http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2010/03/19/000262044_20100319154024/Rendered/PDF/Project0Inform1ment1Appraisal0Stage.pdf Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

van Kesteren supplementary material

van Kesteren supplementary material 1

Download van Kesteren supplementary material(File)
File 14.3 KB