Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:02:31.326Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Experimental infection of chickens with two species of Eimeria isolated from the Malaysian jungle fowl

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

P. L. Long
Affiliation:
Houghton Poultry Research Station, Houghton, Huntingdon

Extract

Two species of Eimeria isolated from jungle fowl of Malaysia were examined in infections of chickens. Eimeria diminuta reproduced well in the embryo CAM and caused severe infection of the lower small intestine and caeca of chickens, but did not develop in the duodenum. It reproduced well in chickens and severely affected their body weight gain. The endogenous stages and oocysts were similar to E. acervulina var. mivati and cross-protection tests with this parasite and E. acervulina confirmed the close relationship between them. It is suggested that the parasite should be referred to as E. acervulina var. diminuta.

The oocysts of another species examined (E. indentata) were similar to E. maxima: the parasite reproduced well in chickens, was pathogenic and showed marked cross-protection against two strains of E. maxima isolated in Britain. The name E. maxima var. indentata is suggested for this parasite.

When low immunizing doses of two strains of E. maxima isolated and maintained in Britain were given, they did not completely cross-protect against re-infection with the heterologous strain.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Cooper, D. M. & Timms, J. R. (1972). The rearing and maintenance of breeding chickens in isolators. 1. Glassfibre isolators. Avian Pathology 1, 4757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernando, M. A. & Remmler, O. (1973 a). Four new species of Eimeria and one of Tyzzeria from the Ceylon Jungle Fowl Gallus lafayettei. Journal of Protozoology 20, 43–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fernando, M. A. & Remmler, O. (1973 b). Eimeria diminuta sp.n. from the Ceylon jungle fowl Gallus lafayettei. Journal of Protozoology 20, 357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joyner, L. P. (1969). Immunological variation between two strains of Eimeria acervulina. Parasitology 59, 725–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joyner, L. P. & Long, P. L. (1974). The specific characters of the Eimeria: with special reference to the coccidia of the fowl. Avian Pathology (in the Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, P. L. (1970). Some factors affecting the severity of infection with Eimeria tenella in chicken embryos. Parasitology 60, 435–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Long, P. L. (1971). Maintenance of intestinal protozoa in vivo with particular reference to Eimeria and Histomonas. In Isolation and Maintenance of Parasites in vivo, 9th Symposium British Society for Parasitology, pp. 6575. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Long, P. L. (1973). Studies on the relationship between Eimeria acervulina and Eimeria mivati. Parasitology 67, 143–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Long, P. L. & Rowell, J. G. (1958). Counting oocysts of chicken occcidia. Laboratory Practice 7, 515–19.Google Scholar
Long, P. L., Fernando, M. A. & Remmler, O. (1974). Experimental infections of the domestic fowl with a variant of Eimeria praecox from the Ceylon jungle fowl. Parasitology 69, 19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tyzzer, E. E. (1929). Coccidiosis in gallinaceous birds. American Journal of Hygiene 10, 269383.Google Scholar