Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T06:44:42.140Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Experiments upon the feeding of Aëdes aegypti through animal membranes with a view to applying this method to the chemotherapy of malaria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Ann Bishop  and
Barbara M. Gilchrist
Ann Bishop*
Affiliation:
From the Molteno Institute, University of Cambridge
Barbara M. Gilchrist
Affiliation:
From the Molteno Institute, University of Cambridge
*
* Member of the Scientific Staff of the Medical Research Council.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Membranes prepared from chicken skin provide a suitable medium through which Aëdes aegypti females may be induced to gorge.

2. Under suitable conditions the proportion of female A. aegypti which will gorge through membranes, though more variable than when a living chick is offered, is great enough for experimental purposes.

3. It is shown that the gorging reaction in A. aegypti is provoked by a heat gradient between the environment and the food-limiting membrane.

4. The feeding reactions of A. aegypti towards whole blood, fractions of blood, and other sub-stances have been studied. It was found that (a) whole blood, and red corpuscles in saline when ingested through membranes go directly into the stomach which becomes fully distended; (b) haemoglobin in plasma or distilled water is ingested to a lesser degree than whole blood or red corpuscles in saline, and plasma alone is rarely ingested, but all these pass to the stomach; (c) sweet solutions containing glucose or honey are seldom imbibed through membranes and pass to the stomach or diverticula, but only the diverticula are fully distended.

When offered as open drops (a) blood is seldom ingested, but if ingested passes to the stomach; (b) haemoglobin in plasma or water, or plasma alone, are very rarely ingested, but pass mainly to the stomach; (c) sweet solutions containing honey or glucose, or mixtures of blood and honey are readily ingested and pass mainly to the diverticula which become fully distended, though traces may be found in the stomach.

5. Aëdes aegypti may be infected with Plasmodium gallinaceum by allowing them to gorge on drawn infected chicken blood through a membrane. Infection rates comparable to those obtained when the mosquitoes are fed directly on living chickens may be obtained by this method.

6. If infected mosquitoes are allowed to gorge upon uninfected blood through membranes they eject viable sporozoites into the blood. When young chicks are injected intravenously with blood so infected, infections are produced which in period of incubation and intensity are comparable with those resulting from the bites of infected mosquitoes.

7. The ejection of sporozoites through membranes in this manner provides a ready means of obtaining sporozoites free from glandular tissue.

8. Sporozoites collected by this method will be suitable for in vitro experiments upon the action of drugs on sporozoites, and also as a source of material for studying in tissue cultures the developmental stages of the malaria parasite arising directly from the sporozoite.

We wish to thank Prof. D. Keilin, F.R.S., and Dr P. Tate for helpful criticism and advice during the course of the work.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 37 , Issue 1-2 , January 1946 , pp. 85 - 100
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1946

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

adler, S. & Tchernomoretz, I. (1943). Ann. Trop. Med. Parasit. 37, 148.Google Scholar
Bishop, A. & Gilchrist, B. M. (1944). Nature, Lond., 153, 713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davey, D. G. (1944). Nature, Lond., 153, 110.Google Scholar
Fülleborn, F. (1908). Arch. Schiffs- u. Tropenhyg. 12, Beth. 8.Google Scholar
Fülleborn, F. (1932). Arch. Schiffs- u. Tropenhyg. 36, 169.Google Scholar
Gordon, R. M. (1922). Ann. Trop. Med. Parasit. 16, 425.Google Scholar
Gordon, R. M. & Lumsden, W. H. R. (1939). Ann. Trop. Med. Parasit. 33, 259.Google Scholar
Huff, C. G., Coulston, F. & Cantrell, W. (1943). Science, 97, 286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, S. P. & Tate, P. (1938). Parasitology, 30, 128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kadletz, N. A. & Kusmina, L. A. (1929). Arch. Schiffs- u. Tropenhyg. 33, 335.Google Scholar
Kikuth, W. & Giovannola, A. (1933). Riv. Malariol. 12, 657.Google Scholar
Lumsden, W. H. R. & Bertram, D. S. (1940). Ann. Trop. Med. Parasit. 34, 135.Google Scholar
MacGregor, M. E. (1930). Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 23, 329.Google Scholar
MacGregor, M. E. (1931). Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 24, 465.Google Scholar
Nuttall, G. H. F. & Shipley, A. E. (1903). J. Hyg., Camb., 3, 166.Google Scholar
Roy, D. N. & Gosh, S. M. (1940). On J. Malaria Inst. India, 3, 253.Google Scholar
Russell, P. F. & Nono, A. M. (1932). Philipp. J. Sci. 49, 595.Google Scholar
Seaton, D. R. & Lumsden, W. H. R. (1941). Ann. Trop. Med. Parasit. 35, 23.Google Scholar
Tate, P. & Vincent, M. (1933). Parasitology, 25, 96.Google Scholar
Tate, P. & Vincent, M. (1934). Parasitology, 26, 523.Google Scholar
Woke, P. A. (1937). Amer. J. Hyg. 25, 372.Google Scholar
Wright, W. R. (1924). Ann. Trop. Med. Parasit. 18, 77.Google Scholar
Yoeli, M. (1938). Riv. Malariol. 17, 62.Google Scholar
Yoeli, M. & Mer, G. G. (1938). Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 31, 437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yorke, W. & MacFie, J. W. S. (1924). Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 18, 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar