Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T16:52:17.282Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Insect Parasites of Psyllidae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

K. B. Lal
K. B. Lal
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of Edinburgh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The insect parasites bred out of Psyllid hosts, in the course of studying their biology in Scotland, belong to four families of Hymenoptera and one of Diptera, the total number of species encountered being seven. Of these one and possibly two more of the hymenopterous species are hyperparasites. The hosts involved include four species, of which only one, Psyllia mali race peregrina, may be said to have been fairly heavily parasitised. As observed by Ferrière (1926), species of Psyllidae, in spite of their nymphs leading a comparatively sedentary life, are less susceptible to attack by parasites than are the other Homoptera. As a rule the hymenopterous parasites attack them in the nymphal stage, while the dipterous species parasites the adults as well.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 26 , Issue 3 , August 1934 , pp. 325 - 334
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1934

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bagnall, R. S. and Harrison, H. (1924). New British Cecidomyidae. V. Ent. Rec. and J. Var. 26, 38.Google Scholar
Barnes, H. F. (1930). Gall midges (Cecidomyidae) as enemies of the Tingidae, Psyllidae, Aleurodidae and Coccidae. Bull. Ent. Res. 21, 319–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrière, Ch. (1926). Un parasite de Psyllia pyrisuga. Ann. Soc. ent. France, Paris, 95, 189–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrière, Ch. (1931). Notes on African Chalcidoidea. Bull. Ent. Res. 22, 127–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gahan, A. B. and Waterston, J. (1926). Notes on Encyrtidae (Hym.-Chalcidoidea) bred from Psyllids, with descriptions of a new species. Bull. Ent. Res. 16, 373–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gourlay, E. S. (1930). Some parasitic hymenoptera of economic importance. New Zealand J. Sci. and Tech. 2, 339–43.Google Scholar
Haviland, Maud D. (1920). Preliminary note on the life history of Lygocerus (Proctotrypidae), hyperparasite of Aphidius. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 19, 293–5.Google Scholar
Husain, M. A. and Nath, Lala Dina (1923). The life history of Tetrasticus radiatus parasitic on Euphalerus citri Kuw., and its hyperparasite. Rep. of the Proc. Fifth Ent. Meeting Pusa, p. 123.Google Scholar
Ishi, T. (1928). The Encyrtinae of Japan. Bull. Imp. Agric. Expt. Station, Japan, Tokyo, 3, 79–160. (R.A.E. 18, 1930, p. 258.)Google Scholar
Kieffer, J. J. (1907). Proctotrypidae (Suite). Species des Hyménoptères d'Europe et d'Algérie (sous la direction de E. André), 10, fasc. 97. Paris.Google Scholar
Kieffer, J. J. (1913). Genera Insectorum—Diptera—Cecidomyidae, p. 3.Google Scholar
Kieffer, J. J. (1914). Serphidae (=Proctotrypidae) et Calliceratidae (=Ceraphronidae). Das Tierreich, 42, Berlin.Google Scholar
Lal, K. B. (1934). Psyllia peregrina Först., the hawthorn race of the apple sucker, P. mali Schmidb. Ann. App. Biol. 21 (in Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercet, R. G. (1926). Adiciones a la fauna española de Encirtidos—6a nota (Hym., Chalc.). Eos, 2, No. 4, pp. 309–20. (R.A.E. 15, 1927, p. 165.)Google Scholar
Speyer, W. (1929). Der Apfelblattsauger. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waterston, J. (1922). On the Chalcid parasites of Psyllidae. Bull. Ent. Res. 13, 41–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waterston, J. (1923). Notes on parasitic Hymenoptera. Bull. Ent. Res. 14, 103–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar