Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:56:15.590Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Intestinal Protozoa of a Muskrat, Fiber (= Ondatra) zibethica, with a Note upon Retortamonas sp. from the Guinea-pig

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Ann Bishop
Affiliation:
From the Molteno Institute for Research in Parasitology, Cambridge

Extract

Flagellates belonging to four genera, Trichomonas, Giardia, Chilomastix, and Retortamonas, have been found in the caecum and colic loops of the muskrat, Fiber (= Ondatra) zibethica.

A Retortamonas is described from the caecum of two laboratory guinea-pigs.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1934

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bishop, A. (1932). A note upon Retortamonas rotunda n.sp., an intestinal flagellate in Bufovulgaris. Parasitology, 24, 233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, A. (1934). Observations upon Embadomonas intestinalis in culture. Parasitology, 26, 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunha, A. Da and Muniz, L. (1921). Sobra flagellados parasitas. Braz. Medico Ann. 35, pt. 2.Google Scholar
Cunha, A. Da and Muniz, L. (1927). Trichomonas aragaoi n.sp. C.R. Soc. Biol. 97, 1349.Google Scholar
Grassi, B. und Schewiakoff, W. (1888). Beitrag zur Kenntnis des Megastoma entericum. Z. Wissensch. Zool. 46, 143.Google Scholar
Martin, H. M. (1930). A species of Emeria from the muskrat Ondatra zibethica (Linnaeus). Arch. Protistenk. 70, 273.Google Scholar
Tanabe, M. (1933). The morphology and division of Monocercomonas lacertae n.sp. from a lizard. Keijo J. Med. 4, 367.Google Scholar
Wenrich, D. H. (1932). The relation of the protozoan flagellate, Retortamonas gryllotalpae (Grassi, 1879) Stiles, 1902 to the species of the genus Embadomonas Mackinnon, 1911. Trans. Amer. micr. Soc. 51, 225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar