Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:57:35.303Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Population dynamics of Hymenolepis nana in mice: fecundity and the ‘crowding effect’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

A. M. Ghazal  and
R. A. Avery
A. M. Ghazal
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Bristol
R. A. Avery
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Bristol
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Young white mice were infected with different doses of eggs or cysticercoids of Hymenolepis nana and the subsequent faecal egg output was measured over a 3-day period. This was then correlated with worm numbers, determined after killing the hosts. The longest worm in each infection was measured and it was shown that crowding decreased the linear dimensions, number of eggs per proglottis and rate of proglottis production of these worms, but that their shape was not affected.

The relation between total egg output and worm numbers was complex. In both egg-derived and cysticercoid-derived infections the egg production rose to a peak, fell and then levelled off to a constant rate with increasing worm numbers. Cysticercoid-derived worms were larger than egg-derived worms, but produced approximately the same number of eggs per unit of biomass. The differences in the egg output curves for the two types of infection were interpreted as being due to their size difference; this in turn may be a consequence of the host immunological response.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 69 , Issue 3 , December 1974 , pp. 403 - 415
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bailey, G. N. A. (1972). Energetics of a host–parasite system. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of Exeter.Google Scholar
Chandler, A. C. (1939). The effects of number and age of worms on development of primary and secondary infections with Hymenolepis diminuta in rats, and an investigation into the true nature of premunition in tapeworm infections. American Journal of Hygiene 29 D. 105–14.Google Scholar
Gordon, H. McL. & Whitlock, H. V. (1939). A new technique for counting nematode eggs in sheep faeces. Journal of the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Australia 12, 50–2.Google Scholar
Hager, A. (1941). Effects of dietary modifications of host rats on the tapeworm Hymenolepis diminuta. Iowa State College Journal of Science 15, 127–53.Google Scholar
Heyneman, D. (1962). Studies on helminth immunity. IV. Rapid onset of resistance by the white mouse against a challenging infection with eggs of Hymenolepis nana (Cestoda: Hymenolepididae). Journal of Immunology 88, 217–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heyneman, D. (1963). Host–parasite resistance patterns – some implications from experimental studies with helminths. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 113, 114–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hunninen, A. V. (1935). Studies of the life history and host–parasite relations of Hymenolepis fraterna (H. nana, var. fraterna, Stiles) in white mice. American Journal of Hygiene 22, 414–43.Google Scholar
Jones, A. W. & Tan, B. D. (1971). Effect of crowding upon growth and fecundity in the mouse bile duct tapeworm, Hymenolepis microstoma. Journal of Parasitology 57, 88–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacInnis, A. J. & Voge, M. (1970). Experiments and Techniques in Parasitology. San Francisco: W. B. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
Read, C. P. (1951). The ‘crowding effect’ in tapeworm infections. Journal of Parasitology 37, 174–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Read, C. P. (1959). The role of carbohydrates in the biology of cestodes. VIII. Some conclusions and hypotheses. Experimental Parasitology 8, 365–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Read, C. P. & Simmons, J. E. Jr (1963). Biochemistry and physiology of tapeworms. Physiological Reviews 43, 263–305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts, L. S. (1961). The influence of population density on patterns and physiology of growth in Hymenolepis diminuta (Cestoda: Cyclophyllidea) in the definitive host. Experimental Parasitology 11, 332–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shorb, D. A. (1933). Host–parasite relations of Hymenolepis fraterna in the rat and the white mouse. American Journal of Hygiene, 18, 74–113.Google Scholar
Weinmann, C. J. (1958). Egg production by Hymenolepis nana var. fraterna and egg infectivity after passage from mice with light, moderate and heavy worm burdens. Journal of Parasitology 44 (suppl.), 16.Google Scholar