Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:44:26.533Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Electoral Structures, Venue Selection, and the (New?) Politics of School Desegregation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2004

Stephen Samuel Smith ,
Karen M. Kedrowski  and
Joseph M. Ellis
Stephen Samuel Smith
Affiliation:
Stephen Samuel Smith is professor of political science at Winthrop University in Rock Hill, South Carolina (smiths@winthrop.edu)
Karen M. Kedrowski
Affiliation:
Karen M. Kedrowski is associate professor and chair of political science at Winthrop University (kedrowskik@winthrop.edu)
Joseph M. Ellis
Affiliation:
Joseph M. Ellis is a graduate student in political science at Temple University (ellisjm1@temple.edu)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Are school desegregation proponents more likely to succeed in local political arenas in the South than in federal courtrooms? To raise that question on the fiftieth anniversary of Brown v. Board of Education may seem absurd. Had local politics in the South been receptive to desegregation efforts, there would presumably have been scant need for the litigation leading to that landmark case. However, the legal environment, national political climate, and political situation in southern school districts have changed considerably in fifty years—in ways that make the question relevant. Today, we suggest, the answer may frequently be yes.Stephen Samuel Smith is the author of Boom for Whom? Education, Desegregation, and Development in Charlotte. Karen M. Kedrowski is author of Media Entrepreneurs and the Media Enterprise in the U.S. Congress. Joseph M. Ellis is interested in Soviet and post-Soviet politics. The authors thank Manning B. Shaw III for skilled research assistance; Ted Arrington, William Crotty, Anita Earls, Ken Meier, Jennifer Hochschild, and the anonymous reviewers for valuable comments; and the Spencer Foundation and the Winthrop University Research Council for grants to Smith. The authors bear sole responsibility for any errors.

Type
PERSPECTIVES
Information
Perspectives on Politics , Volume 2 , Issue 4 , December 2004 , pp. 795 - 801
Copyright
© 2004 American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abbott, Carl. 1987. The new urban America: Growth and politics in sunbelt cities. rev. ed. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Baumgartner, Frank R., and Bryan D. Jones. 1993. Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bositis, David A. 2001. Changing of the guard: Generational differences among black elected officials. Washington, DC: Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies.
Browning, Rufus P., Dale Rogers Marshall, and David Tabb. 1997. Can people of color achieve power in city government? The setting and the issues. In Racial politics in American cities, 2nd ed., ed. Rufus P. Browning, Dale Rogers Marshall, and David Tabb, 3–14. White Plains, NY: Longman.
Canon, David T. 1999. Race, redistricting, and representation: The unintended consequences of black majority districts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Education Foundation. 2001. 2001 community assessment. Charlotte, NC: privately published.
Clotfelter, Charles T., Helen F. Ladd, and Jacob L. Vigdor. 2003. Segregation and resegregation in North Carolina's classrooms. North Carolina Law Review 81 (4): 1463–1512.Google Scholar
Hochschild, Jennifer L. 1984. The new American dilemma: Liberal democracy and school desegregation. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Huffmon, Scott H. 2003. Race relations and politics in Rock Hill, South Carolina. Paper presented at the faculty research seminar, Department of Political Science, Winthrop University, Rock Hill, November 14.
Key, V. O. 1984. Southern politics in state and nation. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
Lewis, John. 1993. Walking with the wind: A memoir of the movement. San Diego: Harcourt Brace.
Meier, Kenneth J., Eric Gonzalez Juenke, Robert D. Wrinkle, and J. L. Polinard. 2003. Structural choices and representational biases: The color of representation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
Meier, Kenneth J., Joseph Stewart Jr., and Robert E. England. 1989. Race, class, and education: The politics of second-generation discrimination. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Peterson, Paul. 1981. City limits. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Schattschneider, E. E. 1960. The semi-sovereign people. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Smith, Stephen Samuel. 2004. Boom for whom? Education, desegregation, and development in Charlotte. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Smith, Stephen Samuel, Karen M. Kedrowski, and Joseph M. Ellis. 2002. Swimming against the tide: Electoral structures and efforts to promote school desegregation in Rock Hill, South Carolina. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, Savannah.
Stone, Clarence N. 1993. Urban regimes and the capacity to govern: A political economy approach. Journal of Urban Affairs 15 (1): 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeland, Craig M. 2004. Empowering the vision: Community-wide strategic planning in Rock Hill, South Carolina. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.