Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T22:57:22.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

American Cities and American Political Science—a Look at Thick Injustice

A Discussion of Clarissa Rile Hayward and Todd Swanstrom's Justice and the American Metropolis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 August 2012

Jody Miller
Jody Miller
Affiliation:
Rutgers University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The back cover of Clarissa Rile Hayward and Todd Swanstrom's Justice and the American Metropolis concisely lays out a central challenge of contemporary politics: “Today's American cities and suburbs are the sites of ‘thick injustice’—unjust power relations that are deeply and densely concentrated as well as opaque and seemingly intractable. Thick injustice is hard to see, to assign responsibility for, and to change.” The fact that the topic of “urban politics” is not a major theme of political science scholarship both reflects and exacerbates this challenge. And so we have decided to invite a diverse group of social scientists to discuss the book in light of the very big question that it poses: How do American cities look when assessed in terms of their “justice” (or “injustice”), and how might they look if they were assessed in these terms more seriously? In considering this question, discussants have also been asked to consider a related question: How does American political science look when assessed in terms of the extent to which it takes the question of urban justice and injustice seriously?—Jeffrey C. Isaac, Editor

Type
Review Symposium: American Cities and American Political Science—A Look at Thick Injustice
Information
Perspectives on Politics , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , September 2012 , pp. 739 - 742
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, Michelle. 2010. The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Brunson, Rod K., and Miller, Jody. 2006. “Young Black Men and Urban Policing in the United States.” British Journal of Criminology 46: 613–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comfort, Megan. 2007. Doing Time Together: Love and Family in the Shadow of the Prison. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hays, Sharon. 2004. Flat Broke with Children: Women in the Age of Welfare Reform. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jacobs, David. 2008. “Politics, Racial Inequality, and Punishment.” Contemporary Sociology 37(2): 111–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maher, Lisa. 1997. Sexed Work: Gender, Race and Resistance in a Brooklyn Drug Market. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Jody. 2008. Getting Played: African American Girls, Urban Inequality, and Gendered Violence. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Lisa. 2008. The Perils of Federalism: Race, Poverty, and the Politics of Crime Control. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, Becky. 2012. Invisible Men: Mass Incarceration and the Myth of Black Progress. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Popkin, Susan J., Leventhal, Tama, and Weisman, Gretchen. 2010. “Girls in the 'Hood: How Safety Affects the Life Chances of Low-Income Girls.” Urban Affairs Review 45: 715–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlosser, Eric. 1998. “The Prison-Industrial Complex.” The Atlantic. December. (www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1998/12/the-prison-industrial-complex/4669/), accessed March 1, 2012.Google Scholar
Western, Bruce. 2006. Punishment and Inequality in America. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Wilson, William Julius. 2009. More Than Just Race: Being Black and Poor in the Inner City. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar