Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:35:18.434Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Beyond (the Scope of) Conflict: National Black and Latino Advocacy Group Relations in the Congressional and Legal Arenas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2009

Rodney E. Hero  and
Robert R. Preuhs
Rodney E. Hero
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of Notre Dame. E-mail: rhero@nd.edu
Robert R. Preuhs
Affiliation:
Metropolitan State College of Denver. E-mail: rpreuhs@mscd.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We examine activities of and between minority advocacy groups in the U.S., particularly similarities and differences in positions of Blacks and Latinos in their efforts to influence national-level policies. Findings highlight several points. Analysis of Congressional scorecard data indicates only modest overlap among the issues identified by the minority advocacy groups, though there is complete “congruence” on the issues that are identified by both groups. The highest degree of “independence” of the activities examined occurs in Congressional testimony. Regarding legal advocacy, analysis of amicus curiae briefs further affirms the general finding that there is little if any outright competition between Black and Latino advocacy groups. There appears to be considerable “tacit non-cooperation” which varies by policy-type and between these national institutions.

Type
Research Article
Information
Perspectives on Politics , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , September 2009 , pp. 501 - 517
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baumgartner, Frank R., and Jones, Bryan D.. (n.d.). Policy Agendas data set. NSF#SBR 9320322. Accessed October 2005 at http://www.policyagendas.org.Google Scholar
Browne, William P. 1990. Organized interests and their issue niches: A search for pluralism in a policy domain. Journal of Politics 52: 477–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browning, Rufus P., Marshall, Dale Rogers, and Tabb, David H.. 1984. Protest Is Not Enough. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Carmichael, Stokely, and Hamilton, Charles V.. 1967. Black Power: The Politics of Liberation in America. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Chavez, Linda. 1991. Out of the Barrio. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Clarke, Susan E., Hero, Rodney E., Sidney, Mara S., Fraga, Luis R., and Erlichson, Bari A.. 2006. Multiethnic Moments: The Politics of Urban Education Reform. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1961. Who Governs? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Gay, Claudine. 2006. Seeing difference: The effect of economic disparity on Black attitudes toward Latinos. American Journal of Political Science 50 (4): 982–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, Virginia, and Lowery, David. 1996. The Population Ecology of Interest Representation: Lobbying Communities in the American States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, John D., and Newman, Brian. 2008. Minority Report: Evaluating Equality in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grose, Christian. 2005. Disentangling constituency and legislator effects in legislative representation: Black legislators or Black districts? Social Science Quarterly 86 (2): 427–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hero, Rodney E. 1992. Latinos and the U.S. Political System: Two-tiered Pluralism. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Hero, Rodney E., and Tolbert, Caroline J.. 1995. Latinos and substantive representation in the U.S. House of Representatives: Direct, indirect or nonexistent? American Journal of Political Science 39 (3): 640–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hojnacki, Marie. 1997. Interest groups' decisions to join alliances or work alone. American Journal of Political Science 41 (1): 61–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hula, Kevin W. 1999. Lobbying Together: Interest Group Coalitions in Legislative Politics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Jenkins-Smith, Hank C., St. Clair, Gilbert K., and Woods, Brian. 1991. Explaining change in policy subsystems: Analysis of coalition stability and defection over time. American Journal of Political Science 43 (4): 851–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Claire Jean. 1999. Bitter Fruit: The Politics of Black-Korean Conflict in New York. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
McClain, Paula D. 1993. The changing dynamics of urban politics: Black and Hispanic municipal employment—Is there competition? Journal of Politics 55 (May): 399–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClain, Paula D., Carter, Niambi M., Soto, Victoria M. DeFrancesco, Lyle, Monique L., Grynaviski, Jeffrey D., Nunnally, Shayla C., Scotto, Thomas J., Kendrick, J. Alan, Lackey, Gerald F., and Cotton, Kendra Davenport. 2006. Racial distancing in a Southern city: Latino immigrants' views of Black Americans. Journal of Politics 68 (3): 571–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClain, Paula D., and Karnig, Albert K.. 1990. Black and Hispanic socioeconomic and political competition. American Political Science Review 84 (2): 535–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, Kenneth, McClain, Paula D., Polinard, J.L., and Wrinkle, Robert D.. 2004. Divided or together? Conflict and cooperation between African Americans and Latinos. Political Research Quarterly 57 (3): 399–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, Kenneth J., and Stewart, Joseph Jr. 1991. The Politics of Hispanic Education. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinderhughes, Dianne M. 1995. Black interest groups and the 1982 extension of the Voting Rights Act. In Blacks and the American Political System, ed. Perry, Huey L. and Parent, Wayne. Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida.Google Scholar
Preuhs, Robert R. 2006. The conditional effects of minority descriptive representation: Black legislators and policy influence in the American states. Journal of Politics 63 (3): 585–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preuhs, Robert R. 2007. Descriptive representations as a mechanism to mitigate policy backlash. Political Research Quarterly 60 (2): 277–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rocha, Rene. 2007. Cooperation and conflict in multiracial school districts. In Latino Politics: Identity, Mobilization and Representation, ed. Espino, Rodolfo, Leal, David L., and Meier, Kenneth J.. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
Salisbury, Robert H., Heinz, John P., Laumann, Edward O., and Nelson, Robert L.. 1987. Who works with whom? Interest group alliances and opposition. American Political Science Review 81 (4): 1211–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schattschneider, E. E. 1960. The Semi-Sovereign People. Hinsdale, IL: Dryden Press.Google Scholar
Skrentny, John D. 2002. The Minority Rights Revolution. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sonenshein, Raphael J. 1993. Politics in Black and White: Race and Power in Los Angeles. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spaeth, Harold. 2005. The original U.S. Supreme Court judicial database. Available at: http://www.as.uky.edu/polisci/ulmerproject/sctdata.htm. Accessed October 2005.Google Scholar
Strolovitch, Dara Z. 2007. Affirmative Advocacy: Race, Class and Gender in Interest Group Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaca, Nicolas. 2004. The Presumed Alliance: The Unspoken Conflict between Latinos and Blacks and What It Means for America. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Welch, Susan, and Hibbing, John R.. 1984. Hispanic representation in the U.S. Congress. Social Science Quarterly 65 (2): 328–35.Google Scholar