Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T09:11:36.443Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

International Legitimacy Lost? Rule and Resistance When America Is First

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 January 2018

David A. Lake
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The pillars of the Pax Americana are decaying. There are two critical challenges. Our interests with our closest allies have been drifting apart for decades, with increasingly serious consequences. A new populist and economic nationalist coalition has been mobilized in the United States, challenging the internationalist coalition that has prevailed at home since the second World War. These challenges are not the product of President Donald J. Trump. He is the manifestation of these challenges, not their cause. Understanding these challenges requires examining anew the role of international legitimacy and authority in world politics and recognizing that different international orders have different distributional consequences. This essay summarizes my past research on the incentives for international hierarchy, integrates the role of domestic interests into that theory, and explores the nature and role of international legitimacy in the study of world order. Part II examines the Pax Americana, and contrasts this order with those found in the Caribbean basin and Middle East. The final section outlines the changing incentives for cooperation between the United States and Europe, discusses the rise of populism in the United States, and suggests ways of addressing the current challenges to internationalism.

Type
Presidential Address
Information
Perspectives on Politics , Volume 16 , Issue 1 , March 2018 , pp. 6 - 21
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albright, Madeleine K. 1998. “Interview on NBC-TV “The Today Show”.” In The Today Show, ed. Lauer, M.. U.S. Department of State Archive.Google Scholar
Ashley, Richard K. 1984. “The Poverty of Neorealism.” International Oganizaiton 38(2): 225–61.Google Scholar
Autor, David H. 2014. “Skills, Education, and the Rise of Earnings Inequality Among the ‘Other 99 Percent’.” Science 344(6186): 843–51.Google Scholar
Axelrod, Robert. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bially Mattern, Janice and Zarakol, Ayse. 2016. “Theorising Hierarchies in World Politics.” International Organization 70(3): 623–54.Google Scholar
Brawley, Mark R. 1999. Afterglow or Adjustment: Domestic Institutions and Responses to Overstretch. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Bukovansky, Mlada, Clark, Ian, Price, Richard, Reus-Smit, Christian, and Wheeler, Nicholas J.. 2012. Special Responsibilities: Global Problems and American Power. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley. 1977. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Calamur, Krishnadev. 2017. “Merkel Urges ‘Europe to Take Our Fate Into Our Own Hands’.” The Atlantic, May 30.Google Scholar
Chapman, Terrence L. 2011. Securing Approval: Domestic Politics and Multilateral Authorization for War. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Ian. 1989. The Hierarchy of States: Reform and Resistance in the International Order. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clausewitz, Carl von. 1976. On War. Trans. Howard, M. and Paret, P.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Roger. 2017. “Macron’s Art of the Deal.” New York Times, September 21.Google Scholar
Cohn, Nate. 2017. “The Obama-Trump Voters Are Real. Here’s What They Think.” New York Times, August 15.Google Scholar
Cooley, Alexander. 2005. Logics of Hierarchy: The Organization of Empires, States, and Military Occupations. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Crawford, Neta C. 2002. Argument and Change in World Politics: Ethics, Decolonization, and Humanitarian Intervention. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Lance E. and Huttenback, Robert A.. 1986. Mammon and the Pursuit of Empire: The Political Economy of British Imperialism, 1860–1912. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Donnelly, Jack. 2006. “Sovereign Inequalities and Hierarchy in Anarchy: American Power and International Society.” European Journal of International Relations 12(2): 139–70.Google Scholar
Dower, John W. 1999. Embracing Defeat: Japan in the Wake of World War II. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Dunne, Tim. 2003. “Society and Hierarchy in International Relations.” International Relations 17(3): 303–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, Max. 2017. “Fearing U.S. Withdrawal, Europe Considers Its Own Nuclear Deterrent.” New York Times, March 6.Google Scholar
French, David. 2017. “Trump’s Comment On American ‘Killers’ Isn’t as Bad as You Think; It’s Worse.” National Review, February 6.Google Scholar
Frieden, Jeffry A. 1994. “International Investment and Colonial Control: A New Interpretation.” International Organization 48(4): 559–93.Google Scholar
Frieden, Jeffry A. 1999. “Actors and Preferences in International Relations.” In Strategic Choice and International Relations, ed. Lake, D. A. and Powell, R.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Frieden, Jeffry A., Lake, David A., Nicholson, Michael, and Ranganath, Aditya. 2017. “Economic Crisis and Political Change in the United States, 1900 to the Present.” Unpublished manuscript, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
Friedman, Uri. 2017. “The Foreign-Policy Establishment Defends Itself from Trump.” The Atlantic, February 22.Google Scholar
Frum, David. 2017. “The Death Knell for America’s Global Leadership.” The Atlantic, May 31.Google Scholar
Gilpin, Robert. 1981. War and Change in World Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Glanville, Luke. 2014. Sovereignty and the Responsibility to Protect: A New History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Goh, Evelyn. 2013. The Struggle for Order: Hegemony, Hierarchy & Transition in Post-Cold War East Asia. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grandin, Greg. 2010. Empire’s Workshop: Latin America, the United States, and the Rise of the New Imperialism. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Granieri, Ronald J. 2003. The Ambivalent Alliance: Konrad Adenauer, The CDU/CSU, and the West, 1949–1966. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Hancock, Kathleen J. 2009. Regional Integration: Choosing Plutocracy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hechter, Michael. 2013. Alien Rule. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hemmer, Christopher and Katzenstein, Peter J.. 2002. “Why Is There No NATO in Asia? Collective Identity, Regionalism, and the Origins of Multilateralism.” International Organization 56(3): 575–607.Google Scholar
Hobson, John M. and Sharman, J. C.. 2005. “The Enduring Place of Hierarchy in World Politics: Tracing the Social Logic of Hierarchy and Political Change.” European Journal of International Relations 11(1): 63–98.Google Scholar
Hooks, Gregory. 1991. Forging the Military-Industrial Complex: World War II’s Battle of the Potomac. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Hurd, Ian. 2007. After Anarchy: Legitimacy and Power in the United Nations Security Council. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John. 2001. After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John. 2011. Liberal Leviathan: The Origins, Crisis, and Transformation of the American World Order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus. 2006. Civilizing the Enemy: German Reconstruction and the Invention of the West. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, Robert H. 1990. Quasi-States: Sovereignty, International Relations and the Third World. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jamal, Amaney A. 2012. Of Empires and Citizens: Pro-American Democracy or No Democracy at All? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
James, Scott and Lake, David A.. 1989. “The Second Face of Hegemony: Britain’s Repeal of the Corn Laws and the American Walker Tariff of 1846.” International Organization 43(1): 1–29.Google Scholar
Johnson, Jenna. 2016. “Donald Trump to African American and Hispanic Voters: ‘What Do You Have to Lose?’.” Washington Post, August 22.Google Scholar
Kagan, Robert. 2003. Of Paradise and Power: America and Europe in the New World Order. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Kang, David C. 2003/04. “Hierarchy, Balancing, and Empirical Puzzles in Asian International Relations.” International Security 28(3): 165–80.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J. 1985. Small States in World Markets: Industrial Policy in Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret E. and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Keene, Edward. 2002. Beyond the Anarchical Society: Grotius, Colonialism and Order in World Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. 1976. “State Power and the Structure of International Trade.” World Politics 28(3): 317–47.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. 1999. Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich V. 1989. Rules, Norms, and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lake, David A. 1988. Power, Protection, and Free Trade: The International Sources of American Commercial Strategy, 1887–1939. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lake, David A. 1992. “Power Pacifists: Democratic States and War.” American Political Science Review 86(1): 24–37.Google Scholar
Lake, David A. 1996. “Anarchy, Hierarchy, and the Variety of International Relations.” International Organization 50(1): 1–33.Google Scholar
Lake, David A. 1997. “The Rise, Fall, and Future of the Russian Empire: A Theoretical Interpretation.” In The End of Empire? The Transformation of the USSR In Comparative Perspective, ed. Dawisha, K. and Parrott, B.. New York: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Lake, David A. 1999. Entangling Relations: American Foreign Policy in its Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lake, David A. 2009a. Hierarchy in International Relations. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lake, David A. 2009b. “Open Economy Politics: A Critical Review.” Review of International Organization 4: 219–44.Google Scholar
Lake, David A. 2013. “Legitimating Power: The Domestic Politics of U.S. International Hierarchy.” International Security 38(2): 74–111.Google Scholar
Lake, David A. 2016. The Statebuilder’s Dilemma: Legitimacy, Loyalty, and the Limits of External Intervention. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lake, David A. 2017. “Laws and Norms in the Making of International Hierarchies.” In Hierarchies in World Politics, ed. Zarakol, A.. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Landler, Mark. 2017. “Unlike His Predecessors, Trump Steps Back From a Moral Judgement.” New York Times, Aug. 16.Google Scholar
Leffler, Melvyn P. 1992. A Preponderance of Power: National Security, the Truman Administration, and the Cold War. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Levi, Margaret. 1988. Of Rule and Revenue. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Londono, Ernesto. 2017. “In Latin America, Pence Aims to Soften ‘America First’ Message.” New York Times, August 16.Google Scholar
Lukes, Steven. 1977. Power: A Radical View. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lundestad, Geir. 1990. The American “Empire.” New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lynch, Marc. 2016. The New Arab Wars: Uprisings and Anarchy in the Middle East. New York: PublicAffairs.Google Scholar
Mandelbaum, Michael. 2005. The Case for Goliath: How America Acts as the World’s Government in the 21st Century. New York: PublicAffairs.Google Scholar
McDonald, Patrick J. 2015. “Great Powers, Hierarchy, and Endogenous Regimes: Rethinking the Domestic Causes of Peace.” International Oganizaiton 69(3): 557–88.Google Scholar
Miller, James Edward 1986. The United States and Italy, 1940–1950: The Politics and Diplomacy of Stabilization. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Milner, Helen V. 1991. “The Assumption of Anarchy in International Relations: A Critique.” Review of International Studies 17: 67–85.Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans J. 1978. Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. 5th ed., rev. ed. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Muendler, Marc. 2017. “Trade, Technology, and Prosperity: An Account of Evidence from a Labor-market Perspective.” World Trade Organization, Staff Working Paper ERSD-2017-15. Available at https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/reser_e/ersd201715_e.pdf.Google Scholar
Nexon, Daniel H. and Musgrave, Robert Paul. Forthcoming. “Defending Hierarchy from the Moon to the Indian Ocean: Symbolic Capital and Political Dominance in Early Modern China and the Cold War.” International Oganizaiton 72.Google Scholar
North, Douglass C. 1981. Structure and Change in Economic History. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
North, Douglass C. and Weingast, Barry R.. 1989. “Constitutions and Credible Commitments: The Evolution of the Institutions of Public Choice in 17th Century England.” Journal of Economic History 49: 803–32.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 1982. The Rise and Decline of Nations: Economic Growth, Stagflation, and Social Rigidities. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Parent, Joseph M. and Erikson, Emily. 2009. “Anarchy, Hierarchy, and Order.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 22(1): 129–45.Google Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian. 2005. “Liberal Hierarchy and the Licence to Use Force.” Review of International Studies 31(Supplement S1): 71–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rich, Motoko. 2017. “Japan Still Seeks U.S. Protection but Quietly Stakes Its Own Path.” New York Times, August 18.Google Scholar
Risse, Thomas, ed. 2011. Governance Without A State? Politics and Politics in Areas of Limited Statehood. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rodrik, Dani. 1997. Has Globalization Gone Too Far? Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John G. 1983. “International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order.” In International Regimes, ed. Krasner, S. D.. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John G. 1986. “Continuity and Transformation in the World Polity: Toward a Neorealist Synthesis.” In Neorealism and Its Critics, ed. Keohane, R. O.. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John G, ed. 1993. Multilateralism Matters: The Theory and Praxis of an Institutional Form. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Scharpf, Fritz. 1999. Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Brian C. 1998. The Political Discourse of Anarchy: A Disciplinary History of International Relations. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. 1985. Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Stroup, Sarah and Wong, Wendy H.. 2017. The Authority Trap. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Alexander. 2009. Channels of Power: The UN Security Council and U.S. Statecraft in Iraq. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Trump, Donald J. 2017. “Remarks by President Trump to the People of Poland.” The White House: Office of the Press Secretary. Available at https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2017/07/06/remarks-president-trump-people-poland-july-6-2017.Google Scholar
Uhlmann, Chris. 2017. “G20: Does Donald Trump’s Awkward Performance Indicate America’s Decline as a World Power?” Australian Broadcast Company, July 9.Google Scholar
Vice, Margaret. 2017. “Publics Worldwide Unfavorable toward Putin, Russia.” Pew Research Center. Available at http://www.pewglobal.org/2017/08/16/publics-worldwide-unfavorable-toward-putin-russia/.Google Scholar
Wall, Irwin M. 1991. The United States and the Making of Postwar France, 1945-1954. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walt, Stephen M. 1987. The Origins of Alliances. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Walt, Stephen M. 2005. Taming American Power: The Global Response to U.S. Primacy. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Weber, Katja. 2000. Hierarchy Amidst Anarchy: Transaction Costs and Institutional Choice. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1978. Economy and Society. 2 vols. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Weingast, Barry R. 1997. “The Political Foundations of Democracy and the Rule of Law.” American Political Science Review 91(2): 245–63.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1992. “Anarchy is what States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics.” International Organization 46(2): 391–425.Google Scholar
Wertheim, Stephen. 2017. “Donald Trump’s Plan to Save Western Civilization.” New York Times, July 22.Google Scholar
Zurn, Michael, Tokhi, Alexandros, Binder, Martin, Keller, Xaver, and Payton, Autumn Lockwood. 2015. The International Authority Data Project, WZB, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar