Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T14:15:52.420Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Power Politics of Regime Complexity: Human Rights Trade Conditionality in Europe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2009

Emilie M. Hafner-Burton
Emilie M. Hafner-Burton
Affiliation:
Woodrow Wilson School for Public and International Affairs, Princeton University. E-mail: ehafner@princeton.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article argues that international regime complexity has shaped Europe's politics of human rights trade conditionality by creating opportunities for various types of “forum shopping,” and, consequently, that some of the most significant politics of human rights enforcement have occurred in an entirely separate issue area—trade—which are being worked out partly during lawmaking and partly during implementation. The presence of nested and overlapping institutions creates incentives for rival political actors—whether states, institutions, or policymakers—to (1) forum shop for more power, (2) advantage themselves in the context of a parallel or overlapping regime, and (3) invoke institutions á la carte to govern a specific issue but not others. Each tactic creates competition between institutions and actors for authority over the rules, setting hurdles for IO performance. Even so, (4) regime complexity can make enforcement of rules that are impossible to implement in one area possible in another area.

Type
Symposium
Information
Perspectives on Politics , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , March 2009 , pp. 33 - 37
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alston, Philip, Bustelo, Mara R., and Heenan, James, eds. 1999. The EU and Human Rights. Oxford, UK and New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Lorand. 2005. Human Rights Conditionality in the EU's International Agreements. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandtner, Barbara, and Rosas, Allan. 1998. Human rights and the external relations of the European Community: An analysis of doctrine and practice. European Journal of International Law 3 (9): 468ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Commission. 1995. Communication “On the inclusion of respect for democratic principles and human rights in agreements between the Community and third countries.” COM (95)216 of 23 May 1995.Google Scholar
European Council. 1991. Council Regulation (EEC) No. 3300/91 of 11 November 1991 (OJ 1991 L 315).Google Scholar
European Council. 2003. EU Annual Human Rights Report, 10 October 2003.Google Scholar
European Report. 1997. EU/Australia: Minister Fails to Solve Wrangle on Human Rights Clause. February 1.Google Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M. 2005. Trading human rights: How preferential trade agreements influence government repression. International Organization 59 (3): 593–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M. 2009. Forced to be Good: Why Trade Agreements Boost Human Rights. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., and Tsutsui, Kiyoteru. 2005. Human rights in a globalizing world: The paradox of empty promises. American Journal of Sociology 110 (5): 1373–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hathaway, Oona A. 2002. Do human rights treaties make a difference? The Yale Law Journal 111: 1935–2042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, Judith. 2004. International actors on the domestic scene: Membership conditionality and socialization by international institutions. International Organization 58 (3): 459–59.Google Scholar