Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:59:15.838Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response to Erik Kuhonta's review of Mobilizing Restraint: Democracy and Industrial Conflict in Post-Reform South Asia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 August 2012

Emmanuel Teitelbaum
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

To what extent does Mobilizing Restraint provide insights that are useful to the study of developing countries beyond South Asia? This question deserves serious attention, but in raising doubts about whether my study has broader applicability, Erik Kuhonta does not engage key arguments in the book as well as much of the empirical evidence that I present to support them.

Type
Critical Dialogue
Information
Perspectives on Politics , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , September 2012 , pp. 811 - 812
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Banerji, A., and Ghanem, H.. 1995. “Political Regimes, Trade, and Labor Policies in Developing Countries.” Working Paper no. 1521. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
Fields, G. 1994. “Changing Labor Market Conditions and Economic Development in Hong Kong, the Republic of Korea, Singapore, and Taiwan, China.” World Bank Economic Review 8(3): 395–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, R. 1993. “Does Suppression of Labor Contribute to Labor Market Success? Labor Relations and Markets in East Asia.” World Bank Policy Research Department Working Paper Series on the East Asian Miracle. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
Robertson, G., and Teitelbaum, E.. 2011. “Regime Type, Investment, and Economic Protest in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.” American Journal of Political Science 55(3): 665–77.Google Scholar