We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
Erwin, E. (1978), Behavioral Therapy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Giere, R. (1979), Understanding Scientific Reasoning. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Grünbaum, A. (1984), The Foundations of Psychoanalysis. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Luborsky, L., and Mintz, J. (1974), “What Sets off Momentary Forgetting During a Psychoanalysis?”, Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Science3: 233–68.Google Scholar
Martin, M. (1964), “Mr. Farrell and the Refutability of Psychoanalysis”, Inquiry7: 80–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, E. (1959), “Methodological Issues in Psychoanalytic Theory”, in Psychoanalysis, Scientific Method, and Philosophy, Hook, S. (ed.), New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Popper, K. (1963), Conjectures and Refutations. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Suppes, P. (1967), “What is a Scientific Theory”, in Philosophy of Science Today, Morgenbesser, S. (ed.), New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, R. (1984), “Review of Farrell's The Standing of Psychoanalysis”, The Standing of Psychoanalysis18: 534–41.Google Scholar