Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T08:48:55.212Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Methodology to establish a composite collection: case study in lentil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2007

Bonnie J Furman*
Affiliation:
International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), P.O. Box 5466, Aleppo, Syrian Arab Republic
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: b.furman@cgiar.org

Abstract

The International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA) is participating in a large-scale programme, Subprogram 1 of the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) Generation Challenge Program, that aims to explore the genetic diversity of the global germplasm collections held by the CGIAR research centres. This project will identify a ‘composite collection’ of germplasm for individual crops, representing the range of diversity of each crop species and its wild relatives, and characterize each composite set using anonymous molecular markers, mainly simple sequence repeats (SSRs). The overall goal of this project is to study diversity across given genera and identify genes for resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses that can be used in crop improvement programmes. ICARDA was responsible for creating the composite collection for lentil. ICARDA has the global mandate for lentil and houses the largest global collection of this crop with 10,509 accessions. From this collection, a global composite collection of 1000 lentil accessions was established with the aim to represent genetic diversity and the agro-climatological range of lentil. Accessions for the composite collection were compiled from landraces, wild relatives, and elite germplasm and cultivars. The methodology presented here combined classical hierarchical cluster analyses using agronomic traits and two-step cluster analyses using agro-climatological data linked to the geographical coordinates of the accessions' collection sites. Genotyping for 30 SSR loci will be carried out for all 1000 accessions. Plants grown for DNA analysis will be harvested and progeny will be evaluated under field conditions at ICARDA.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abou-Zeid, N, Erskine, W and Bayaa, B (1995) Preliminary screening of lentil for resistance to downy mildew. Arab Journal of Plant Protection 13: 1719.Google Scholar
Arumuganathan, K and Earle, ED (1991) Nuclear DNA content of some important plant species. Plant Molecular Biology 9: 208218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barulina, H (1930) Lentils of the USSR and other countries. Bulletin of Applied Botany, Genetics and Plant Breeding 40 Suppl: 265304Google Scholar
Bayaa, B, Erskine, W and Hamdi, A (1994) Response of wild lentil to Ascochyta fabae fsp lentis from Syria. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 41: 6165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayaa, B, Erskine, W and Hamdi, A (1995) Evaluation of a wild lentil collection for resistance to vascular wilt. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 42: 231235.Google Scholar
Bayaa, B, Erskine, W and Singh, M (1997) Screening lentil for resistance to fusarium wilt: methodology and sources of resistance. Euphytica 98: 6974.Google Scholar
Brown, ADH (1989 a) Core collections: a practical approach to genetic resources management. Genome 31: 818824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, ADH (1989 b) The case for core collections. In: Brown, ADH, Frankel, OH and Marshal, RD (eds) The Use of Plant Genetic Resources. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.136155Google Scholar
Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) (2005) Research & impact, areas of research: lentils, http://www.cgiar.org/impact/research/lentils.html/ (accessed 14 July 2005).Google Scholar
Crossa, J, DeLacy, IH and Taba, S (1995) The use of multivariate methods in developing a core collection. In: Hodgkin, T, Brown, AHD, Van Hintum, ThJL and Morales, EAV (eds) Core Collections of Plant Genetic Resources. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 7792Google Scholar
Cubero, JI (1981) Origin, taxonomy and domestication. In: Webb, C, Hawtin, G, Lentils Slough: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, pp. 1538Google Scholar
Empig, L, Lantican, T and Escuro, PB (1970) Heritability estimates of quantitative characters in Phaseolus aureus Robx. Crop Science 10: 240242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erskine, W (1996) Lessons for breeder from land races of lentil. Euphytica 93: 107112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erskine, W and Goodrich, WJ (1991) Variability in lentil growth habit. Crop Science 31: 10401044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, ME and Robertson, LD (1999) Morphological and phenological variation in the wild relatives of lentil. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 46: 312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, M and Erskine, W (2001) Lentils (Lens L). In: Maxted, N and Bennett, SJ (eds) Plant Genetic Resources of Legumes in the Mediterranean. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 125131.Google Scholar
Ferguson, ME, Maxted, M, van Slageren, M and Robertson, LD (2000) A re-assessment of the taxonomy of Lens Mill. (Leguminosae, Papilionoideae, Vicieae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 133: 4159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2004) Food and Agriculture Organization statistical databases (FAOSTAT), Rome, http://faostat.fao.org/ (accessed 14 July 2005).Google Scholar
Frankel, OH and Brown, AHD (1984) Current plant genetic resources—a critical appraisal. In: Chopra, VL, Joshi, BC, Sharma, RP and Bansal, HC (eds) Genetics: New Frontiers New Delhi: Oxford & IBH Publishing Co., pp. 113.Google Scholar
Greene, SL and Morris, JB (2001) The case for multiple-use plant germplasm collections and a strategy for implementation. Crop Science 41: 886892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamdi, A and Erskine, W (1996) Reaction of wild species of the genus Lens to drought. Euphytica 91: 173179.Google Scholar
Hamdi, A, Erskine, W and Gates, P (1992) Adaptation of lentil seed yield to varying moisture supply. Crop Science 32: 987990.Google Scholar
Hamdi, A, Küsmenoğlu, I and Erskine, W (1996) Sources of winter hardiness in wild lentil. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 43: 6367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamwieh, A, Udupa, SM, Choumane, W, Sarker, A, Dreyer, F, Jung, C and Baum, M (2005) A genetic linkage map of Lens sp. based on microsatellite and AFLP markers and the localization of Fusarium vascular wilt resistance. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 110: 669677.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harlan, JR (1995) Agricultural origins and crop domestication in the Mediterranean region. Diversity 2 1/2 1416Google Scholar
Ibrahim, M, Erskine, W, Hanti, G and Fares, A (1993) Lodging in lentil as affected by plant population soil moisture and genotype. Experimental Agriculture 29: 201206.Google Scholar
Johnson, JB and Jimmerson, J (2003) Lentils. Briefing no. 61. Bozeman, MT: Agricultural Marketing Policy Center, Montana State University.Google Scholar
Ladizinsky, G (1979) The origin of lentil and its wild genepool. Euphytica 28: 179187.Google Scholar
Robertson, LD and Erskine, W (1997) Lentil, In: Fuccillo, D, Sears, L and Stapleton, P (eds) Biodiversity in Trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 128138.Google Scholar
Robertson, LD, Singh, KB, Erskine, W, Abd, El and Moneim, AM (1996) Useful genetic diversity in gemplasm collections of food and forage legumes from West Asia and North Africa. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 43: 447460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoen, DJ and Brown, AHD (1995) Maximising genetic diversity in core collections of wild relatives of crop species. In: Hodgkin, T, Brown, AHD, Van Hintum, ThJL and Morales, EAV (eds) Core Collections of Plant Genetic Resources. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 5576.Google Scholar
Sharma, SK, Dawson, IK and Waugh, R (1995) Relationships among cultivated and wild lentils revealed by RAPD analysis. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 91: 647654.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silim, SN, Saxena, MC and Erskine, W (1993 a) Adaptation of lentil to the Mediterranean environment I: factors affecting yield under drought conditions. Experimental Agriculture 29: 919.Google Scholar
Silim, SN, Saxena, MC and Erskine, W (1993 b) Adaptation of lentil to the Mediterranean environment II: response to moisture supply. Experimental Agriculture 29: 2128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solh, M and Erskine, W (1981) Genetic resources In: Webb, C and Hawtin, G (eds) Lentils. Slough: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, pp. 5368.Google Scholar
Spagnoletti Zeuli, PL and Qualset, CO (1993) Evaluation of five strategies for obtaining a core subset from a large genetic resource collection of durum wheat. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, pp. 295304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Summerfield, RI, Roberts, IH, Erskine, W and Ellis, RH (1985) Effects of temperature and photoperiod on flowering in lentils (Lens culinaris Medic). Annals of Botany 56: 659671.Google Scholar
Tai, PYP and Miller, JD (2001) A core collection for Saccharum spontaneum L from the world collection of sugarcane. Crop Science 41: 879885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Upadhyaya, HD, Bramel, PJ and Singh, S (2001) Development of a chickpea core subset using geographic distribution and quantitative traits. Crop Science 41: 206210.Google Scholar
Valkoun, J, Robertson, LD and Konopka, J (1995) Genetic resources at the heart of ICARDA mission throughout the Mediterranean region. Diversity 2 1/2 2324Google Scholar
van Hintum, ThJL (1995) Hierarchical approaches to the analysis of genetic diversity in crop plants. In: Hodgkin, T, Brown, AHD, Van Hintum, ThJL and Morales, EAV (eds) Core Collections of Plant Genetic Resources Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 2334Google Scholar
van Hintum, ThJL (1999) The general methodology for creating a core collection. In: Johnson, RC and Hodgkin, T (eds) Core Collections for Today and Tomorrow. Rome: International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, pp. 1017.Google Scholar
Webb, C and Hawtin, G (1981) Introduction. In: Webb, C and Hawtin, G (eds) Lentils. Slough: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, pp. 15.Google Scholar
Yau, S-K and Erskine, W (2000) Diversity of boron-toxicity tolerance in lentil growth and yield. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 47: 5561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeh, FC, Yang, RC, Boyle, TBJ, Ye, ZH and Mao, JX (1997) POPGENE, the User-friendly Shareware for Population Genetic Analysis. Edmonton: Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Centre, University of AlbertaGoogle Scholar
Yonezawa, K, Nomura, T and Morishima, H (1995) Sampling strategies for use in stratified germplasm collections. In: Hodgkin, T, Brown, AHD, Van Hintum, ThJL and Morales, EAVCore Collections of Plant Genetic Resources. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 3554.Google Scholar
Zohary, D and Hopf, M (1988) Domestication of Plants in the Old World. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar