Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:13:08.284Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Five Portuguese Etymologies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2020

C. C. Rice
C. C. Rice*
Affiliation:
Catawba College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Comment and Criticism
Information
PMLA , Volume 61 , Issue 2 , June 1946 , pp. 584 - 585
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1946

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Revista de fil. esp., xix, 117-150, 229-260.

2 Williams, From Latin to Portuguese, §33.4.

3 Gamillscheg, op. cit., 255.

4 Williams, op. cit., §74.1.

5 Diccionario etymologico da lingua portuguesa.

6 REW 3, No. 6441.

7 Possibly a misprint, since the second edition has firmar.

8 Archiv. f. d. Studium d. neuern Sprachen, cxxvii, 159 f.

9 Zur Kenntniss des Altlogudoresischen 64. REW 2,3 No. 3332.

10 The word is not in Lewis and Short's dictionary, but Diez (Et. Wb. der Rom. Sprachen 371) quotes from Isidore the gloss Fistilor sibilo.

11 Die Gegenstandskulturen Sanabrias und seiner Nachbar gemeinden, 76.

12 Op. cit.

13 Op. cit., §92.9, p. 97.

14 Rom. Gram., 2.611, §92.9.

15 Lang., xviii, 29.

16 Cf. Spitzer, Hisp. Rev., x, 344, who accepts the semantic shift ‘snarl’ > ‘gnaw’; questions the form ringari erroneously written by me for ClL ringi; questions the alleged Old Port, relhar quoted by me in reporting Prof. Holmes's theory deriving Port. rilhar from Lat. religare; and prefers to derive Port, rilhar from the already posited ∗ringulare ‘snarl.’ The Johns Hopkins professor here predicts that etymologists will soon be limiting their etymological bases to the types already recorded in REW 3. Cf. Rev. de fil. esp. 13.116, where Spitzer attempted to derive Sp. sesgar ‘to cut across’ from ∗sessicare ‘to set,’ instead of the ∗sesecare proposed by me and adopted in REW 3. I now recognize that Ulrich's etymon ∗sexicare (:∗sexus for sectus ‘cut’) is more probably correct, in view of Hispanic participles in -x- for -ct-: ∗dejexare > Sp. dejar, ∗coaxare > Sp. quejar (Hisp. Rev., vi, 351; ix, 309 f.), as well as Lat. fixus fictus, fluctus fiuxus, frixus frictus, etc. (Hisp. Rev. vi, 351). ∗Sexicare was first proposed in Z. f. rom. Phil., iv, 383.