Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T08:53:22.595Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Lyric Commodity Critique, Benjamin Adorno Marx, Baudelaire Baudelaire Baudelaire

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Extract

So how important is modern lyric poetry?

Answers will depend on who's answering—and what they understand by modern, lyric, and poetry. Academic and other cultural institutions will hardly have the only say; the most significant testimonies often come from poets themselves, who in relation to matters academic and institutional may have feet in more than one camp but who perhaps finally have, in proportion to the intensity and overall achievement of their art, no camp at all. Yet an at least century-long critical tradition, which Marjorie Perloff's 2006 MLA Presidential Address joins, has salutarily maintained that for all academia's evident weaknesses—including an often fatal distance from the realities of artistic making and audience engagement—it can still contribute crucially to the life of poetry. In that light, it's worth reconsidering a body of work that for decades has resonated in the larger poetry world but has also known academic prominence: Frankfurt school—and the wider spectrum of Marxian and Marxian-inflected—critical theory. What if, in ways that have mostly escaped notice, a signal exchange between Frankfurt school critics demonstrates (with lessons aplenty for poetry, criticism, and theory today) that, far from merely illustrating theoretical and sociohistorical dynamics, the development of modern lyric animates or generates the theory in the first place, locating itself at the heart of Frankfurt school and related attempts to take history's measure and to enable reflective judgment and critical agency?

Type
Theories and Methodologies
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 by The Modern Language Association of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Giorgio, Agamben. “The Prince and the Frog: The Question of Method in Adorno and Benjamin.” Infancy and History: On the Destruction of Experience. Trans. Liz Heron. 1978. London: Verso, 1993. 117–38.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor W., and Benjamin, Walter. The Complete Correspondence, 1928–1940. Ed. Lonitz, Henri. Trans. Nicholas Walker. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1999. Trans, of Briefwechsel 1928–1940. Ed. Henri Lonitz. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1994.Google Scholar
Charles, Baudelaire. The Flowers of Evil. Trans, and introd. Keith Waldrop. Middletown: Wesleyan UP, 2006. Trans, of Les fleurs du mal. Ed. Claude Pichois. Paris: Gallimard, 1975. Vol. 1 of Œuvres complètes. 2 vols.Google Scholar
Walter, Benjamin. Gesammelte Schriften. Ed. Tiedemann, Rolf and Schweppenhäuser, Hermann. 7 vols, and 3 supp. vols. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1972–99.Google Scholar
Walter, Benjamin. Illuminations: Essays and Reflections. Ed. and introd. Arendt, Hannah. Trans. Harry Zohn. New York: Schocken, 1969.Google Scholar
Walter, Benjamin. “Little History of Photography.” Selected Writings. Trans. Rodney Livingstone et al. Ed. Michael W. Jennings, Howard Eiland, and Gary Smith. Vol. 2. Cambridge: Belknap-Harvard UP, 1999. 507–30. Trans, of “Kleine Geschichte der Photographie.” Benjamin, Gesammelte Schriften 2:368–85.Google Scholar
Walter, Benjamin. “On Some Motifs in Baudelaire.” Benjamin, Illuminations 155–200. Trans, of “Über einige Motive bei Baudelaire.” Benjamin, Gesammelte Schriften 1:605–53.Google Scholar
Walter, Benjamin. “The Paris of the Second Empire in Baudelaire.” Charles Baudelaire: A Lyric Poet in the Era of High Capitalism. Trans. Harry Zohn. London: New Left, 1973. 9106. Trans, of “Das Paris des Second Empire bei Baudelaire.” Benjamin, Gesammelte Schriften 1:511–604.Google Scholar
Walter, Benjamin. “Theses on the Philosophy of History.” Benjamin, Illuminations 253–64. Trans, of “Über den Begriff der Geschichte.” Benjamin, Gesammelte Schriften 1:691704.Google Scholar
Walter, Benjamin. “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction.” Benjamin, Illuminations 217–51. Trans, of “Das Kunstwerk im Zeitalter seiner technischen Reproduzierbarkeit.” Benjamin, Gesammelte Schriften 1:471508.Google Scholar
Martin, Jay. Songs of Experience: Modern American and European Variations on a Universal Theme. Berkeley: U of California P, 2005.Google Scholar
Karl, Marx. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. 1867. New York: International, 1965.Google Scholar
Karl, Marx. Critique of the Gotha Programme. 1890–91. Marx/Engels Selected Works. Vol. 3. Moscow: Progress, 1970. 1330.Google Scholar
Karl, Marx. The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. 1852. Whitefish: Kessinger, 2004.Google Scholar
Karl, Marx. The Poverty of Philosophy. 1847. New York: Progress, 1955.Google Scholar
Marjorie, Perloff. “Presidential Address 2006: It Must Change.” PMLA 122 (2007): 652–62.Google Scholar
Vallejo, César. “Aniversario de Baudelaire.” 1928. Crónicas. Ed. and introd. Aguirre, Enrique Ballón. Vol. 2. México: U Nacional Autónoma de México, 1985. 270–71. 2 vols.Google Scholar
Vallejo, César. “At Baudelaire's Tomb.” Trans. Eliot Weinberger. Sulfur 33 (1993): 128–29.Google Scholar