Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:45:33.827Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Location, Location, Location: An MCMC Approach to Modeling the Spatial Context of War and Peace

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2017

Michael D. Ward  and
Kristian Skrede Gleditsch
Michael D. Ward
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science and Center for Statistics in the Social Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, and Éspace Éurope, Université Pierre Mendès France, Grenoble, France, BP 38040. e-mail: mdw@u.washington.edu
Kristian Skrede Gleditsch
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0521. e-mail: kgleditsch@ucsd.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article demonstrates how spatially dependent data with a categorical response variable can be addressed in a statistical model. We introduce the idea of an autologistic model where the response for one observation is dependent on the value of the response among adjacent observations. The autologistic model has likelihood function that is mathematically intractable, since the observations are conditionally dependent upon one another. We review alternative techniques for estimating this model, with special emphasis on recent advances using Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) techniques. We evaluate a highly simplified autologistic model of conflict where the likelihood of war involvement for each nation is conditional on the war involvement of proximate states. We estimate this autologistic model for a single year (1988) via maximum pseudolikelihood and MCMC maximum likelihood methods. Our results indicate that the autologistic model fits the data much better than an unconditional model and that the MCMC estimates generally dominate the pseudolikelihood estimates. The autologistic model generates predicted probabilities greater than 0.5 and has relatively good predictive abilities in an out-of-sample forecast for the subsequent decade (1989 to 1998), correctly identifying not only ongoing conflicts, but also new ones.

Type
Research Article
Information
Political Analysis , Volume 10 , Issue 3: Special Issue on Spatial Methods in Political Science , Summer 2002 , pp. 244 - 260
Copyright
Copyright © Political Methodology Section of the American Political Science Association 2002 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anselin, Luc. 1988. Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babst, Dean. 1964. “Electoral Governments: A Force for Peace.” Wisconsin Sociologist 1:9–14.Google Scholar
Beck, Neal, King, Gary, and Zeng, Langche. 2000. “The Problem with Quantitative Studies of Conflict: A Conjecture.” American Political Science Review 94:21–36.Google Scholar
Besag, Julian E. 1972. “Nearest-Neighbour Systems: A Lemma with Application to Bartlett's Global Solutions.” Journal of Applied Probability 9:418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besag, Julian E. 1974. “Spatial Interaction and the Statistical Analysis of Lattice Systems (with Discussion).” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, Methodological 36:192–225.Google Scholar
Besag, Julian E. 1975. “Statistical Analysis of Non-lattice Data.” Statistician 24:179.Google Scholar
Besag, Julian E. 1977. “Efficiency of Pseudolikelihood Estimation for Simple Gaussian Fields.” Biometrika 64:616.Google Scholar
Besag, Julian E., and Moran, Patrick A. P. 1975. “On the Estimation and Testing of Spatial Interaction in Gaussian Lattice Processes.” Biometrika 62:555.Google Scholar
Easterly, William, and Levine, Ross. 1999. “Troubles with the Neighbours: Africa's Problem, Africa's Opportunity.” Journal of African Economies 7:120–142.Google Scholar
Gelman, Andrew, Carlin, John B., Stern, Hal S., and Rubin, David B. 1995. Bayesian Data Analysis. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Geman, Stuart, and Geman, Donald. 1984. “Stochastic Relaxation, Gibbs Distributions and the Bayesian Restoration of Images.” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 6:721–741.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geyer, Charles J., and Thompson, Elizabeth A. 1992. “Constrained Monte Carlo Maximum Likelihood for Dependent Data (with Discussion).” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, Methodological 54:657–699.Google Scholar
Gleditsch, Kristian S. 2002. All International Politics Is Local: The Diffusion of Conflict, Integration, and Democratization. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Gleditsch, Kristian S., and Ward, Michael D. 2000. “War and Peace in Space and Time: The Role of Democratization.” International Studies Quarterly 44:1–29.Google Scholar
Gleditsch, Kristian S., and Ward, Michael D. 2001. “Measuring Space: A Minimum Distance Database and Applications to International Studies.” Journal of Peace Research 38:749–768.Google Scholar
Gotway, Carol, and Stroup, Walter. 1997. “A Generalized Linear Model Approach to Spatial Data Analysis and Prediction.” Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics 2:157–178.Google Scholar
Gumpertz, Marcia L., Graham, Jonathan M., and Ristaino, Jean B. 1997. “Autologistic Model of Spatial Pattern of Phytophthora Epidemic in Bell Pepper: Effects of Soil Variables on Disease Presence.” Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics 2:131–156.Google Scholar
Gumpertz, Marcia L., Wu, Chi-tsung, and Pye, John M. 1999. “Logistic Regression for Southern Pine Beetle Outbreaks with Spatial and Temporal Autocorrelation.” Technical Report 2513. Raleigh: Institute of Statistics, North Carolina State University.Google Scholar
Gurr Ted, Robert, and Moore, Will H. 1997. “Ethnopolitical Rebellion: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the 1980s with Risk Assessments for the 1990s.” American Journal of Political Science 41:1079–1103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harary, Frank, Norman, Robert Z., and Cartright, Dorwin. 1965. Structural Models: An Introduction to the Theory of Directed Graphs. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Hegre, Håvard, Ellingsen, Scott Gates, Tanja, and Petter Gleditsch, Nils. 2001. “Toward a Democratic Civil Peace? Democracy, Political Change, and Civil War, 1816-1992.” American Political Science Review 95:33–48.Google Scholar
Hoeting, Jennifer A., Leecaster, Molly, and Bowden, David. 2000. “An Improved Model for Spatially Correlated Binary Responses.” Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics 5:102–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huffer, Fred W., and Wu, Hulin. 1998. “Markov Chain Monte Carlo for Autologistic Regression Models with Application to the Distribution of Plant Species.” Biometrics 54:509–524.Google Scholar
Jackman, Simon. 2000. “Estimation and Inference Via Bayesian Simulation: An Introduction to Markov Chain Monte Carlo.” American Journal of Political Science 44:369–398.Google Scholar
King, Gary, and Zeng, Langche. 2001. “Improving Forecasts of State Failure.” World Politics 53:623–658.Google Scholar
Lopez-Vazo, Enrique, Vayá, Ester, Mora, Antonio J., and Suriñach, Jordi. 1999. “Regional Economic Dynamics and Convergence in the European Union.” Annals of Regional Science 33:343–370.Google Scholar
Most, Benjamin A., and Starr, Harvey. 1989. Inquiry, Logic, and International Politics. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Murdoch, James C., Sandler, Todd, and Sargent, Keith. 1997. “A Tale of Two Collectives: Sulfur versus Nitrogen Oxides Emission Reduction in Europe.” Economica 64:281–301.Google Scholar
O'Loughlin, John, Ward, Michael D., Lofdahl, Corey L., Cohen, Jordin S., Brown, David S., Reilly, David, Gleditsch, Kristian S., and Shin, Michael. 1998. “The Diffusion of Democracy, 1946-1994.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 88:545–574.Google Scholar
Ripley, Brian D. 1988. Statistical Inference for Spatial Processes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rummel, Rudolph J. 1983. “Libertarianism and International Violence.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 27:27–71.Google Scholar
Rummel, Rudolph J. 1984. “Libertarianism, Violence within States, and the Polarity Principle.” Comparative Politics 16:443–463.Google Scholar
Rummel, Rudolph J. 1985. “Libertarian Propositions on Violence within and between Nations.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 29:419–455.Google Scholar
Schrodt, Philip A. 2000. “Forecasting Conflict in the Balkans Using Hidden Markov Models.” Presented at the Annual Meetings of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Schrodt, Philip A., and Mintz, Alex. 1988. “A Conditional Probability Analysis of Regional Interactions in the Middle East.” American Journal of Political Science 32:217–230.Google Scholar
Shin, Michael E., and Ward, Michael D. 1999. “Lost in Space: Political Geography and the Defense-Growth Trade-off.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 43:793–816.Google Scholar
Signorino, Curtis. 1999. “Strategic Interaction and the Statistical Analysis of International Conflict.” American Political Science Review 92:279–298.Google Scholar
Singer, J. David, and Small, Melvin. 1994. Correlates of War Project: International and Civil War Data, 1816-1992 (ICPSR 9905). Ann Arbor, MI: Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research.Google Scholar
Strauss, Davis, and Ikeda, Michael. 1990. “Pseudolikelihood Estimation for Social Networks.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 85:204–212.Google Scholar
Wallensteen, Peter, and Sollenberg, Margareta. 1999. “Armed Conflict, 1989-98.” Journal of Peace Research 36:593–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, Michael D. 1988. “Cargo Cult Social Science and Eight Fallacies of Comparative Political Research.” International Studies Notes 13:75–77.Google Scholar
Ward, Michael D., and Gleditsch, Kristian S. 1998. “Democratizing for Peace.” American Political Science Review 92:51–61.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Ward and Gleditsch supplementary material

Supplementary Material

Download Ward and Gleditsch supplementary material(File)
File 15.3 KB