Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T02:02:37.968Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Methodology of Cointegration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2017

Nathaniel Beck
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It is hardly surprising that I applaud the fine work of both Durr and Ostrom and Smith. I am on record in favor of the utility of the error correction model (e.g., Beck 1985) and it is impossible to obtain a visa to visit the economics department at UCSD without swearing an oath of loyalty to the methodology of cointegration. The two works here are notable for their methodological sophistication, their exposition of a relatively unknown and highly technical area, and, most important, their substantive contributions. Both articles show that political attitudes (approval and policy mood) adjust, in the long run, to changes in objective and subjective economic circumstance. Both articles are good examples of the synergy of methods and theory, since it is the methodology of cointegration that leads to this type of theorizing, and this type of theorizing can most easily be tested in the context of cointegration or error correction.

Type
Research Article
Information
Political Analysis , Volume 4 , 1992 , pp. 237 - 247
Copyright
Copyright © by the University of Michigan 1993 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beck, N. 1985. “Estimating Dynamic Models Is Not Merely a Matter of Technique.” Political Methodology 11: 71–90.Google Scholar
Beck, N. 1989. “Estimating Dynamic Models Using Kalman Filtering.” Political Analysis 1: 121–56.Google Scholar
Beck, N. 1991a. “Comparing Dynamic Specifications: The Case of Presidential Approval.” Political Analysis 3: 51–87.Google Scholar
Beck, N. 1991b. “The Economy and Presidential Approval: An Information-Theoretic Perspective.” In Economics and Politics: The Calculus of Support, ed. Norpoth, H., Lewis-Beck, M., and Lafay, J.-D., 85–101. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Chrystal, K., and Peel, D. 1986. “What Can Economists Learn from Political Science and Vice Versa?” American Economic Review 76(2): 62–65.Google Scholar
Davidson, J., Hendry, D., Srba, F., and Yeo, S. 1978. “Econometric Modelling of the Aggregate Time-Series Relationship between Consumers’ Expenditures and Income in the United Kingdom.” Economic Journal 88: 661–92.Google Scholar
Dickey, D., and Fuller, W. 1979. “Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with Unit Root.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 74: 427–31.Google Scholar
Engle, R., and Granger, C. 1987. “Co-integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation and Testing.” Econometrica 55: 251–76.Google Scholar
Engle, R., and Granger, C. 1991. “Introduction.” In Long Run Relationships: Readings in Cointegration, ed. Engle, R. and Granger, C., 1–16. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirchgässner, G. 1985. “Rationality, Causality and the Relationship between Economic Conditions and the Popularity of Parties, an Empirical Investigation for the Federal Republic of Germany, 1971-82.” European Economic Review 28: 243–68.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, J. 1991. “Critical Values for Cointegration Tests.” In Long Run Relationships: Readings in Cointegration, ed. Engle, R. and Granger, C., 267–76. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
MacKuen, M. 1984. “Political Drama, Economic Conditions, and the Dynamics of Presidential Popularity.” American Journal of Political Science 28: 164–92.Google Scholar
Sargan, J. D. 1964. “Wages and Prices in the United Kingdom: A Study in Econometric Methodology.” In Econometric Analysis for National Economic Planning, ed. Hart, P., Mills, G., and Whittaker, J., 273–314. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Sims, C. 1980. “Macroeconomics and Reality.” Econometrica 48: 1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar