Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:43:56.515Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Analyzing the Robustness of Semi-Parametric Duration Models for the Study of Repeated Events

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2017

Janet M. Box-Steffensmeier ,
Suzanna Linn  and
Corwin D. Smidt
Janet M. Box-Steffensmeier
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Ohio State University, 2140 Derby Hall, 154 N. Oval Mall Columbus, OH 43210
Suzanna Linn*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Penn State University, 320 Pond Lab, University Park, PA 16802
Corwin D. Smidt
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Michigan State University, South Kedzie Hall, 368 Farm Lane, S303, East Lansing, MI 48824
*
e-mail: slinn@la.psu.edu (corresponding author)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Estimators within the Cox family are often used to estimate models for repeated events. Yet, there is much we still do not know about the performance of these estimators. In particular, we do not know how they perform given time dependence, different censoring rates, and a varying number of events and sample sizes. We use Monte Carlo simulations to demonstrate the performance of a variety of popular semi-parametric estimators as these data aspects change and under conditions of event dependence and heterogeneity, both, or neither. We conclude that the conditional frailty model outperforms other standard estimators under a wide array of data-generating processes, and data limitations rarely alter its performance.

Type
Research Article
Information
Political Analysis , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , Spring 2014 , pp. 183 - 204
Copyright
Copyright © The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Political Methodology 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Authors' note: Thanks to Neal Beck and anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on drafts of the article.

References

Andersen, P. K., and Gill, R. D. 1982. Cox's regression model for counting processes: A large sample study. Annals of Statistics 10: 1100–1120.Google Scholar
Baccini, L. 2012. Democratization and trade policy: An empirical analysis of developing countries. European Journal of International Relations 18(3): 455–79.Google Scholar
Beardsley, K. 2008. Agreement without peace? International mediation and time inconsistency problems. American Journal of Political Science 52(4): 723–40.Google Scholar
Bender, R., Augustin, T., and Blettner, M. 2005. Generating survival times to simulate Cox proportional hazards models. Statistics in medicine 24(11): 1713–23.Google Scholar
Boehmke, F., Morey, D., and Shannon, M. 2006. Selection bias and continuous-time duration models: Consequences and a proposed solution. American Journal of Political Science 50(1): 192–207.Google Scholar
Boehmke, F. J., and Skinner, P. 2012. State policy innovativeness revisited. State Politics and Policy Quarterly 12: 304–30.Google Scholar
Boehmke, F. J., and Witmer, R. 2004. Disentangling diffusion: The effects of social learning and economic competition on state policy innovation and expansion. Political Research Quarterly 57(1): 39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Box-Steffensmeier, J. M., and De Boef, S. 2006. Repeated events survival models: The conditional frailty model. Statistics in Medicine 25(20): 3518–33.Google Scholar
Brancati, D., and Snyder, J. 2011. Rushing to the polls: The causes of premature postconflict elections. Journal of Conflict Resolution 55(3): 469–92.Google Scholar
Brown, M. 1996. The international dimensions of internal conflict. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cheung, Y., Xu, Y., Tan, S., and Milligan, P. 2010. Estimation of intervention effects using first or multiple episodes in clinical trials: The Andersen-Gill model re-examined. Statistics in Medicine 29(3): 328–36.Google Scholar
Cook, R. J., Lawless, J., and Nadeau, C. 1996. Robust tests for treatment comparisons based on recurrent event responses. Biometrics 52(2): 557–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cook, R. J., and Lawless, J. F. 1997. An overview of statistical methods for multiple-failure time data in clinical trials: Discussion. Statistics in Medicine 16(8): 841–43.Google Scholar
Curini, L. 2011. Government survival the Italian way: The core and the advantages of policy immobilism during the first republic. European Journal of Political Research 50(1): 110–42.Google Scholar
Dugan, L., LaFree, G., and Piquero, A. 2005. Testing a rational choice model of airline hijackings. Intelligence and Security Informatics 3495: 513–29.Google Scholar
Fernandez, J. 2010. Economic crises, high public pension spending, and blame-avoidance strategies: Pension policy retrenchments in 14 social-insurance countries, 1981–2005. Technical report, MPIfG Discussion Paper.Google Scholar
Gray, G. R. 1992. Flexible methods for analyzing survival data using splines, with application to breast cancer prognosis. Journal of the American Statistical Association 87(420): 942–51.Google Scholar
Greig, J. M. 2001. Moments of opportunity: Recognizing conditions of ripeness for international mediation between enduring rivals. Journal of Conflict Resolution 45(6): 691–718.Google Scholar
Harezlak, J., and Tu, W. 2006. Estimation of survival functions in interval and right censored data using STD behavioral diaries. Statistics in Medicine 25(23): 4053–64.Google Scholar
Henderson, R., and Oman, P. 1999. Effect of frailty on marginal regression estimates in survival analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical Methodology 61(2): 367–79.Google Scholar
Kelly, P. J., and Lim, L. L.-Y. 2000. Survival analysis for recurrent event data: An application to childhood infectious disease. Statistics in Medicine 19: 13–33.Google Scholar
Kuhn, U. 2009. Stability and change in party preference. Swiss Political Science Review 15(3): 463–94.Google Scholar
Leighley, J. E., and Nagler, J. 2013. Who votes now? Demographics, issues, inequality, and turnout in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Li, Q., and Lagakos, S. 1997. Use of the Wei-Lin-Weissfeld method for the analysis of a recurring and a terminating event. Statistics in Medicine 16(8): 925–40.3.0.CO;2-2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maoz, Z. 1996. Domestic sources of global change. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Martin, L., and Vanberg, G. 2003. Policing the bargain: Coalition government and parliamentary scrutiny. American Journal of Political Science 48(1): 13–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metcalfe, C., and Thompson, S. 2006. The importance of varying the event generation process in simulation studies of statistical methods for recurrent events. Statistics in Medicine 25(1): 165–79.Google Scholar
Oakes, D. 1992. Frailty models for multiple event times. In Survival analysis, state of the art, eds. Klein, John P. and Goel, P. K. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Pepe, M., and Cai, J. 1993. Some graphical displays and marginal regression analysis for recurrent failure times and time dependent covariates. Journal of the American Statistical Association 88(423): 811–20.Google Scholar
Plutzer, E. 2002. Becoming a habitual voter: Inertia, resources, and growth in young adulthood. American Political Science Review 96(1): 41–56.Google Scholar
Prentice, R., Williams, B., and Peterson, A. 1981. On the regression analysis of multivariate failure time data. Biometrika 68(2): 373–9.Google Scholar
Rohde, D. W., and Simon, D. M. 1985. Presidential vetoes and congressional response: A study of institutional conflict. American Journal of Political Science 29: 397–427.Google Scholar
Schneider, G., and Wiesehomeier, N. 2008. Rules that matter: Political institutions and the diversity: Conflict nexus. Journal of Peace Research 45(2): 183–203.Google Scholar
Stukel, T. 1993. Comparison of methods for the analysis of longitudinal interval count data. Statistics in Medicine 12(14): 1339–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suciu, G. P. 2002. Nonparametric survival comparison methods. Typescript.Google Scholar
Sun, J., and Yang, I. 2000. Nonparametric tests for stratum effects in the Cox model. Lifetime Data Analysis 6(4): 321–30.Google Scholar
Therneau, T. M., and Grambsch, P. M. 2000. Modeling survival data: Extending the Cox model. Statistics for Biology and Health. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Therneau, T. M., and Hamilton, S. A. 1997. rhDNase as an example of recurrent event analysis. Statistics in Medicine 16(18): 2029–47.Google Scholar
Wei, L. J., Lin, D. Y., and Weissfeld, L. 1989. Regression analysis of multivariate incomplete failure time data by modeling marginal distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association 84(408): 1065–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar