No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Politics of Aging: A Hands-on Approach
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 October 2015
Extract
Cold, irrefutable demographics clearly signal a traumatic intergenerational shift in political power. Statistics indicate that by the year 2020 political and economic clout will have drained from the middle-aged to the elderly, or more specifically, to the “young-old.” By the time the Baby Boom generation reaches retirement, its cohort could wield enough political and economic influence to alter political-campaign and corporate-marketing strategies, to tip the scales of the candidate selection process, and to dominate most decision-making centers. This process of power recognition and accumulation is now irreversible. The media, marketing departments, and campaign strategists are all struggling to redefine their target audience, to reassess the depth of political involvement, and to reshape their imagery to fit the new reality. Ironically, political science departments appear reluctant to restructure their course offerings so that this dramatic power transfer can be examined from a political perspective at the undergraduate level.
We make a statement by what we don't teach—by what we fail to discuss and to dissect. Realizing this, in 1987 Santa Clara University's Center of Education on Aging, in conjunction with the political science department, initiated a senior seminar with a strictly political slant on the aging dilemma. Participants chose to function as an exploratory team in the creation of a “political profile” of the aging in the Santa Clara area. Together with their individual research projects, this profile was to serve as the core of a pilot course—a model which subsequent classes and other colleges might draw upon in structuring their own format.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Political Science Association 1988
References
References
*Atchley, Robert. 1985. Social Forces and Aging. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing. Provides a comprehensive theoretical framework and specific background information as a basis for individual research projects/outreach programs.Google Scholar
Bell, Marilyn. 1986. Women as Elders: Images, Visions and Issues. New York: Haworth Press.Google Scholar
Binstock, Robert H., and Shanas, Ethel, eds. 1976. Handbook of Aging and the Social Sciences. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co.Google Scholar
Brown, Judith, and Kerns, Virginia. 1985. In Her Prime. S. Hadley, MA: Bergin and Garvey Publishers.Google Scholar
*Burt, Martha, and Pittman, Karen. 1985. Testing the Social Safety Net. Washington: Urban Institute Press. Updates economic data and policy analysis found in Schultz to include: current characteristics of the low-income elderly, the impact of relevant federal programs through Reagan's first term, and the comparative effectiveness of centralized v. local funding and control.Google Scholar
*Cowgill, Donald O. 1986. Aging Around the World. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Press. Addresses theories of aging from an unbiased crosscultural perspective, including comparative demographics, value and kinship systems, and the aging process in relation to modernization.Google Scholar
Cox, Donald O. 1984. Later Life: The Realities of Aging. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
†
Cox, Harold, ed. 1987. Aging, 5th ed. Guilford, CT: Dushkin Publishing Group. Supplementary text providing a case study approach to innovative programs designed to solve specific dilemmas associated with the aging process. Used as a baseline in evaluating pilot projects available in Santa Clara County.Google Scholar
Estes, Carroll. 1984. Political Economy, Health, and Aging. Boston: Little, Brown and Co.Google Scholar
*Gelfand, Donald E. 1982. Aging: The Ethnic Factor. Boston: Little, Brown and Co. Focuses on immigration patterns, relative rates of subculture development, interaction, and satisfaction ratios of ethnic aged. Includes concrete case studies highlighting community support systems, relative strength of family assistance, and the interrelationship of ethnicity and service program usage.Google Scholar
*Gross, Ronald. 1980. The New Old—Struggling for Decent Aging. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books. Essays analyzing changing definitions of aging, defining appropriate policy responses, and setting priorities for advocacy and policy intervention.Google Scholar
*Harris, Louis. 1975. The Myth and Reality of Aging in America. Washington: National Council on the Aging. The most extensive poll ever conducted to determine the public's attitude toward aging and to document the “agings'” own views and attitudes about themselves. Used as a baseline for evaluating our study.Google Scholar
Hendricks, Jon, and Davis, C.. 1986. Aging in Mass Society. Boston: Little, Brown and Co.Google Scholar
*Horan, Dennis J., and Mall, David. 1980. Death, Dying and Euthanasia. Frederick, MD: University Publications of America. Controversial essays providing diverse ethical frameworks and data on a subject students found of great concern, relevancy, and emotional impact. Effective stimulus for debate.Google Scholar
*Kart, Cary. 1985. The Realities of Aging. Newton, MA: Allyn and Bacon. Stresses the future impact of demographic shifts, implications of the elderly as a “favored constituency,” and policy alternatives to long-term institutionalization.Google Scholar
Kart, Cary, and Manard, Barbara. 1981. Aging in America. Sherman Oaks, CA: Alfred Publishing Co.Google Scholar
*Kirschner, Paul. 1976. Advocacy and Age. Los Angeles: Ethel Percy Andrus Gerontology Center, University of Southern California. Though outdated, this book still provides a significant core of information on basic lobbying strategy, media access, and specific studies of the Grey Panthers, black advocacy, and the potential for intergenerational tension.Google Scholar
†
Lammers, William. 1983. Public Policy and the Aging. Washington: Congressional Quarterly Press. Selected as the primary text for its clear, concise, and unbiased approach, and the broad range of problems and policy options analyzed.Google Scholar
*Lowy, Louis. 1980. Social Policies and Programs on Aging. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books. Focuses on the formulation of health, housing, and social service policy, and the level of voter participation and advocacy skill needed to affect change.Google Scholar
Lowy, Louis. 1985. Later Years and Social Work with the Aging. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
*Quadagno, Jill. 1980. Aging, the Individual and Society. New York: St. Martin's Press. Essays, often paired as mutual critiques. Designed to encourage comparison of problems encountered in urban v. rural settings, homogeneous v. heterogeneous communities, and between men and women as they face the financial and psychological challenges of old age.Google Scholar
Rich, Bennett, and Baum, Martha. 1984. The Aging: Guide to Public Policy. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
*Schultz, James. 1976. The Economics of Aging. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing. Although outdated, this book maintains its position as the most reliable source of both theory and hard data on retirement income, private pension plans, Social Security, and the relative merit of reform proposals. See Burt for update.Google Scholar
Weeks, John. 1984. Aging: Concepts and Social Issues. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.Google Scholar
*Williamson, John. 1985. Aging and Public Policy. Springfield, IL: C.C. Thomas. Concise, clear history of public policy formulation from its English origins through modernization, to current dilemmas involving the relative merit of private pension plans v. Social Security, longterm health care cost containment, and the mass media as a legitimizer of social control.Google Scholar