Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T14:34:03.758Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Legitimizing Military Action through “Rape-as-a-Weapon” Discourse in Libya: Critical Feminist Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2018

Sarka Kolmasova
Affiliation:
Metropolitan University Prague
Katerina Krulisova
Affiliation:
Metropolitan University Prague and Nottingham Trent University

Abstract

Contemporary discourse on sexual(ized) violence in armed conflicts represents a powerful source for legitimization of highly controversial military interventions. Recent gender-responsive security studies have called for enhanced protection of women and girls from widespread and systematic sexual(ized) violence. Yet military operations reproduce the Western masculine hegemony rather than providing inclusive and apolitical assistance to victims of sexual assault. The article aims to critically assess discourse on sexual violence in a case of military intervention in Libya initiated under the rubric of the Responsibility to Protect (R2P). The case study indicates a set of discursive strategies exercised by Western political representatives and nongovernmental organizations and even more expressively by the media to legitimize the military campaign. Typically, sexual(ized) violence is presented as a weapon of war, used by one of the conflicting parties without an adequate response of the state. This is followed by urgent calls for international action, willingly carried out by Western powers. The simplified narrative of civilized protectors versus savage aggressors must be challenged as it exploits the problem of sexual(ized) violence in order to legitimize politically motivated actions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from internal research funding of the Center of Security Studies, Metropolitan University Prague. We would also like to thank the editors, Mary Caputi and Sun Young, as well as the reviewers for their valuable comments and support.

References

REFERENCES

Abrahams, Fred. 2011. “Hold Gadhafi Accountable for Atrocities.” Human Rights Watch, February 22. https://www.hrw.org/news/2011/02/22/hold-gadhafi-accountable-atrocities (accessed June 13, 2018).Google Scholar
Abu-Lughod, Lila. 2013. Do Muslim Women Need Saving? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Adams, Simon. 2011. “Libya and the Responsibility to Protect.” Occasional Paper 3, Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect. http://www.globalr2p.org/media/files/libyaandr2poccasionalpaper-1.pdf (accessed June 13, 2018).Google Scholar
Autesserre, Séverine. 2012. “Dangerous Tales: Dominant Narratives on the Congo and Their Unintended Consequences.” African Affairs 111 (443): 202–22.Google Scholar
Baaz, Maria Eriksson, and Stern, Maria. 2009. “Why Do Soldiers Rape? Masculinity, Violence, and Sexuality in the Armed Forces in the Congo (DRC).” International Studies Quarterly 53 (2): 495518.Google Scholar
Baaz, Maria Eriksson, and Stern, Maria. 2013. Sexual Violence as a Weapon of War? Perceptions, Prescriptions, Problems in the Congo and Beyond. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bachman, Jeff. 2016. “Revisiting the ‘Humanitarian’ Intervention in Libya.” Huffington Post, March 14. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jeff-bachman/revisiting-the-humanitari_b_9445270.html (accessed June 13, 2018).Google Scholar
Berger, Peter L., and Luckmann, Thomas. 1984. The Social Construction of Reality: Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Toronto: Penguin.Google Scholar
Bond, Jennifer, and Sherret, Laurel. 2012. “Mapping Gender and the Responsibility to Protect: Seeking Intersections, Finding Parallels.” Global Responsibility to Protect 4 (2): 133–53.Google Scholar
Brownmiller, Susan. 1976. Against Our Will. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
Buss, Doris E. 2009. “Rethinking ‘Rape as a Weapon of War.’Feminist Legal Studies 17 (2): 145–63.Google Scholar
Card, Claudia. 1996. “Rape as a Weapon of War.” Hypatia 11 (4): 518.Google Scholar
Carpenter, R. Charli. 2006. “Recognizing Gender-Based Violence against Civilian Men and Boys in Conflict Situations.” Security Dialogue 37(1): 83103.Google Scholar
Carpenter, R. Charli. 2013. Innocent Women and Children: Gender, Norms and the Protection of Civilians. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Chesterman, Simon. 2011. “‘Leading from Behind’: The Responsibility to Protect, the Obama Doctrine, and Humanitarian Intervention after Libya.” Ethics & International Affairs 25 (3): 279–85.Google Scholar
Daalder, Ivo H., and Stavridis, James G.. 2012. “NATO's Victory in Libya: The Right Way to Run an Intervention.” Foreign Affairs 91 (2): 17.Google Scholar
Davies, Sara E., and Teitt, Sarah. 2012. “Engendering the Responsibility to Protect: Women and the Prevention of Mass Atrocities.” Global Responsibility to Protect 4 (2): 198222.Google Scholar
Enloe, Cynthia. 1993. The Morning After: Sexual Politics at the End of the Cold War. Berkley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Enloe, Cynthia. 2000. Maneuvers: The International Politics of Militarizing Women's Lives. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Evans, Gareth. 2009. The Responsibility to Protect: Ending Mass Atrocity Crimes Once and For All. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1989. Language and Power. United Kingdom: Longman.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 2003. Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fermor, Christopher. 2012–13. “NATO's Decision to Intervene in Libya (2011): Realist Principles or Humanitarian Norms?Journal of Politics & International Studies 8: 323–61.Google Scholar
Gerntholtz, Liesl. 2011. “Women in the Crossfire.” Human Rights Watch, June 8. https://www.hrw.org/news/2011/06/08/women-crossfire (accessed June 13, 2018).Google Scholar
Goldstein, Joshua S. 2011. “Humanitarian Intervention Comes of Age: Lessons from Somalia to Libya.” Foreign Affairs 90 (6): 50, 51–58, 59.Google Scholar
Hehir, Aidan, and Murray, Robert, eds. 2013. Libya, the Responsibility to Protect and the Future of Humanitarian Intervention. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch. 2011. “Libya: Immediately Release Woman Who Alleged Rape.” March 28. https://www.hrw.org/news/2011/03/28/libya-immediately-release-woman-who-alleged-rape (accessed June 13, 2018).Google Scholar
International Coalition for the Responsibility to Protect (ICR2P). 2011. “The Crisis in Libya.” http://www.responsibilitytoprotect.org/index.php/crises/crisis-in-libya (accessed June 13, 2018).Google Scholar
International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty (ICISS). 2001. “The Responsibility to Protect: The Report of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty (Responsibility to Protect).” http://responsibilitytoprotect.org/ICISS%20Report.pdf (accessed June 13, 2018).Google Scholar
International Crisis Group (ICG). 2011. “Popular Protest in North Africa and the Middle East (V): Making Sense of Libya.” June 6. https://www.crisisgroup.org/middle-east-north-africa/north-africa/libya/popular-protest-north-africa-and-middle-east-v-making-sense-libya (accessed June 13, 2018).Google Scholar
Kinsella, Helen M. 2011. The Image before the Weapon: A Critical History of the Distinction between Combatant and Civilian. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kirby, Paul. 2012. “How Is Rape a Weapon of War? Feminist International Relations, Modes of Critical Explanation and The Study of Wartime Sexual Violence.” European Journal of International Relations 19 (4): 797821.Google Scholar
Kirby, Paul. 2013. “Refusing to Be a Man? Men's Responsibility for War Rape and the Problem of Social Structures in Feminist and Gender Theory.” Men and Masculinities 16 (1): 93114.Google Scholar
Kuperman, Alan J. 2015. “Obama's Libya Debacle: How a Well-Meaning Intervention Ended in Failure.” Foreign Affairs 94 (2): 6677.Google Scholar
Lamont, Christopher. 2016. “Contested Governance: Understanding Justice Interventions in Post-Qadhafi Libya.” Journal of Intervention and State-Building 10 (3): 382–99.Google Scholar
Meger, Sara. 2016. “The Fetishization of Sexual Violence in International Security.” International Studies Quarterly 60 (1): 149–59.Google Scholar
Moghadam, Valentine M. 2014. “Modernising Women and Democratisation after the Arab Spring.” Journal of North African Studies 19 (2): 137–42.Google Scholar
Norooz, Erfaun. 2015. “Responsibility to Protect and Its Applicability in Libya and Syria.” Vienna Journal on International Constitutional Law 9 (3): 150.Google Scholar
Nygren, Anders. 2014. “Executing Strategy from the Air.” In The NATO Intervention in Libya: Lessons Learned from the Campaign, eds. Engelbrekt, Kjell, Mohlin, Marcus, and Wagnsson, Charlotte. New York: Routledge, 103–27.Google Scholar
Patrick, Stewart. 2011. “Libya and the Future of Humanitarian Intervention.” Foreign Affairs, August 26. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/libya/2011-08-26/libya-and-future-humanitarian-intervention (accessed June 13, 2018)Google Scholar
Pattison, James. 2011. “The Ethics of Humanitarian Intervention in Libya.” Ethics & International Affairs 25 (3): 271–77.Google Scholar
Rativoi, Andrea Deciu. 2008. “Talking the Political Talk: Cold War Refugees and Their Political Legitimation through Style.” In Rhetoric in Detail, eds. Johnstone, Barbara and Eisenhart, Christopher. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 3357.Google Scholar
Shepherd, Laura J., ed. 2013. Critical Approaches to Security: An Introduction to Theories and Methods. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sjoberg, Laura. 2015. “War/Rape/Porn.” Critical Studies on Security 3 (2): 230–32.Google Scholar
Skjelsbæk, Inger. 2012. “Responsibility to Protect or Prevent? Victims and Perpetrators of Sexual Violence Crimes in Armed Conflicts.” Global Responsibility to Protect 4 (2): 154–71.Google Scholar
Sörenson, Karl, and Damides, Nima. 2014. “Fragments of an Army: Three Aspects of the Libya Collapse.” In The NATO Intervention in Libya: Lessons Learned from the Campaign, eds. Engelbrekt, Kjell, Mohlin, Marcus, and Wagnsson, Charlotte. New York: Routledge, 151–68.Google Scholar
Thakur, Ramesh. 2011. The Responsibility to Protect: Norms, Laws and the Use of Force in International Politics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A. 1998. Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage.Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, Theo. 2008. Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vilmer, Jean-Baptiste Jeangène. 2016. “Ten Myths about the 2011 Intervention in Libya.” Washington Quarterly 39 (2): 2343.Google Scholar
Weiss, Thomas G. 2011. “RtoP Alive and Well after Libya.” Ethics & International Affairs 25 (3): 287–92.Google Scholar
Wibben, Annick T. R., ed. 2016. Researching War: Feminist Methods, Ethics and Politics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 1996. Disorders of Discourse: Real Language Series. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, and Meyer, Michael. 2001. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Zambakari, Christopher. 2016. “The Misguided and Mismanaged Intervention in Libya: Consequences for Peace.” African Security Review 25 (1): 4462.Google Scholar
Zenko, Micah. 2016. “The Big Lie about the Libyan War.” Foreign Policy, March 22. http://foreignpolicy.com/2016/03/22/libya-and-the-myth-of-humanitarian-intervention/ (accessed June 13, 2018).Google Scholar