Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:36:13.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Context Matters: The Influence of State and Campaign Factors on the Gender Gap in Senate Elections, 1988–2000

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2007

Heather L. Ondercin  and
Jeffrey L. Bernstein
Heather L. Ondercin
Affiliation:
The Pennsylvania State University
Jeffrey L. Bernstein
Affiliation:
Eastern Michigan University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Since the 1980s, we have witnessed how the gender gap grows and shrinks in various elections; we address how the context in which the election takes place influences the size of the divide. Studying the gender gap in Senate elections allows us to look at multiple elections across time and space to determine when significant electoral gender gaps arise and when they do not. This contrasts with more traditional approaches that focus either on a single presidential election or on a single year's House or Senate elections. We demonstrate that electoral gender gaps arise from campaign-level factors (such as candidate sex, the presence of an incumbent, and the issues raised in the campaign), state-level factors (demographics and politics of the states), and the complex interaction of these factors.We would like to thank the many people who gave us helpful feedback and comments on earlier drafts of this paper, particularly Suzanna De Boef, Susan Welch, Eric Plutzer, the Gender and Politics Working Group at Penn State University, Margaret Conway, the editors of this journal, and our anonymous reviewers. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 2001 Annual Meeting of the Southern Political Science Association.

Type
Research Article
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , March 2007 , pp. 33 - 53
Copyright
© 2007 The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Banaszak, Lee Ann, and Eric Plutzer. 1993. “Contextual Determinants of Feminist Attitudes: National and Subnational Influences in Western Europe.” American Political Science Review 87 (March): 147–57.Google Scholar
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., Suzanna De Boef, and Tse-min Lin. 2004. “The Dynamics of the Partisan Gender Gap.” American Political Science Review 98 (August): 515–28.Google Scholar
Campbell, Angus. 1960. “Surge and Decline: A Study of Electoral Change.” Public Opinion Quarterly 24 (Fall): 397–418.Google Scholar
Carroll, Susan J. 1988. “Women's Autonomy and the Gender Gap: 1980 and 1984.” In The Politics of the Gender Gap, ed. Carol M. Mueller. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 236–57.
Carroll, Susan J. 2006. “Voting Choices: Meet You at the Gender Gap.” In Gender and Elections Shaping the Future of American Politics, ed. Susan J. Carroll and Richard L. Fox. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 74–96.
CAWP (Center for American Women, and Politics). 1997. “Fact Sheet: The Gender Gap.” Eagleton Institute of Politics, Rutgers University. http://www.cawp.rutgers.edu (November 1, 2001).
Chaney, Carole Kennedy, R. Michael Alvarez, and Jonathan Nagler. 1998. “Explaining the Gender Gap in U.S. Presidential Elections, 1980–1992.” Political Research Quarterly 52 (June): 311–39.Google Scholar
Clark, Cal, and Janet Clark. 1999. “The Gender Gap in 1996: More Meaning Than a ‘Revenge of the Soccer Moms.’ ” In Women in Politics: Outsiders or Insiders? ed. Lois Duke Whitaker. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 68–84.
Clark, Cal, and Janet Clark. 2000. “Explaining the Gender Gap in the 1996 Presidential Election.” Paper presented at the Southern Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Atlanta, November 9–11.
Clark, Janet, and Cal Clark. 1996. “The Gender Gap: A Manifestation of Women's Dissatisfaction with the American Polity?” In Broken Contract?! Changing Relationships Between Americans and Their Government, ed. Stephen C. Craig. Boulder CO: Westview, 167–82.
Conover, Pamela Johnston, and Virginia Sapiro. 1993. “Gender, Feminist Consciousness and War.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (November): 1079–99.Google Scholar
Cook, Elizabeth Adell. 1994. “Voter Response to Women Senate Candidates.” In The Year of the Woman: Myths and Realities, ed. Elizabeth Adell Cook, Sue Thomas, and Clyde Wilcox. Boulder, CO: Westview, 217–36.
Cook, Elizabeth Adell. 1998. “Voter Reaction to Women Candidates.” In Women and Elective Office: Past, Present and Future, ed. Sue Thomas and Clyde Wilcox. New York: Oxford University Press, 56–72.
Cook, Elizabeth Adell, Ted G. Jelen, and Clyde Wilcox. 1992. Between Two Absolutes: Public Opinion and the Politics of Abortion. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Cook, Elizabeth Adell, Ted G. Jelen, and Clyde Wilcox. 1993. “Generational Differences and Abortion Attitudes.” American Politics Quarterly 21 (January): 31–53.Google Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen. 1997. “Gender Differences in Support for Women Candidates: Is There a Glass Ceiling in American Politics?” Women and Politics 17 (2): 27–41.Google Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen. 1998. “Voting for Women in the ‘Year of the Woman.’” American Journal of Political Science 42 (January): 272–93.Google Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen. 2004. Voting for Women: How the Public Evaluates Women Candidates. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Erie, Steven P., and Martin Rein. 1988. “Women and the Welfare State.” In The Politics of the Gender Gap, ed. Carol Mueller. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 173–91.
Erikson, Robert S., Gerald C. Wright, and John P. McIver. 1993. Statehouse Democracy: Public Opinion and Policy in the American States. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Frankovic, Kathleen A. 1982. “Sex and Politics—New Alignments, Old Issues.” PS: Political Science and Politics 15 (Summer): 439–48.Google Scholar
Hutchings, Vincent L. 2003. Public Opinion and Democratic Accountability: How Citizens Learn about Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Hutchings, Vincent L., Nicholas A. Valentino, Tasha S. Philpot, and Ismail K. White. 2004. “The Compassion Strategy: Race and the Gender Gap in Campaign 2000.” Public Opinion Quarterly 68 (Winter): 512–41.Google Scholar
Kahn, Kim Fridkin, and Patrick J. Kenny. 1999. The Spectacle of U.S. Senate Campaigns. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Kaufmann, Karen M., and John R. Petrocik. 1999. “The Changing Politics of American Men: Understanding the Sources of the Gender Gap.” American Journal of Political Science 43 (July): 864–87.Google Scholar
Koch, Jeffrey W. 2000. “Do Citizens Apply Gender Stereotypes to Infer Candidates' Ideological Orientations?” Journal of Politics 62 (May): 414–29.Google Scholar
MacKuen, Michael B., Robert S. Erikson, and James A. Stimson. 1989. “Macropartisanship.” American Political Science Review 83 (December): 1125–42.Google Scholar
Manza, Jeff, and Clem Brooks. 1998. “The Gender Gap in U.S. Presidential Elections: When? Why? Implications?” American Journal of Sociology 103 (March): 1235–66.Google Scholar
McDermott, Monika L. 1997. “Voting Cues in Low-Information Elections: Candidate Gender as Social Information Variable in Contemporary United States Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (January): 270–83.Google Scholar
Miller, Arthur. 1988. “Gender and the Vote: 1984.” In The Politics of the Gender Gap, ed. Carol M. Mueller. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 258–82.
Norrander, Barbara. 1999. “The Evolution of the Gender Gap” Public Opinion Quarterly 63 (Winter): 566–76.Google Scholar
Paolino, Phillip. 1995. “Group-Salient Issues and Group Representation: Support for Women Candidates in the 1992 Senate Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 39 (May): 294–313.Google Scholar
Plutzer, Eric, and John F. Zipp. 1996. “Identity Politics, Partisanship, and Voting for Women Candidates.” Public Opinion Quarterly 60 (Spring): 30–57.Google Scholar
Sapiro, Virginia, and Pamela Johnston Conover. 1997. “The Variable Gender Basis of Electoral Politics: Gender and Context in the 1992 US Election.” British Journal of Political Science 27 (October): 497–523.Google Scholar
Schaffner, Brian F. 2005. “Priming Gender: Campaigning on Women's Issues in U.S. Senate Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 49 (October): 803–17.Google Scholar
Schlozman, Kay Lehman, Nancy Burns, Sidney Verba, and Jesse Donahue. 1995. “Gender and Citizen Participation: Is There a Different Voice?” American Journal of Political Science 39 (May): 267–93.Google Scholar
Seltzer, Richard A., Jody Newman, and M. Vorrhees Leighton. 1997. Sex as a Political Variable. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
Shapiro, Robert Y., and Harpreet Mahajan. 1986. “Gender Differences in Policy Preferences: A Summary of Trends from the 1960s to the 1980s.” Public Opinion Quarterly 50 (Spring): 42–61.Google Scholar
Sigelman, Lee, and Susan Welch. 1984. “Race, Gender, and Opinion Toward Black and Female Presidential Candidates.” Public Opinion Quarterly 48 (Summer): 467–75.Google Scholar
Teixeira, Ruy A. 1992. The Disappearing American Voter. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
Trevor, Margaret. 1999. “Political Socialization, Party Identification, and the Gender Gap.” Public Opinion Quarterly 63 (Spring): 62–89.Google Scholar
Welch, Susan, and John R. Hibbing. 1992. “Financial Conditions, Gender, and Voting in American National Elections.” Journal of Politics 54 (February): 197–213.Google Scholar
Wilcox, Clyde. 1994. “Why Was 1992 the ‘Year of the Woman’? Explaining Women's Gains in 1992.” In The Year of the Woman: Myths and Realities, ed. Elizabeth Adell Cook, Sue Thomas, and Clyde Wilcox. Boulder, CO: Westview, 1–24.
Wirls, Daniel. 1986. “Reinterpreting the Gender Gap.” Public Opinion Quarterly 50 (Autumn): 316–30.Google Scholar