Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:59:25.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reforming Representation: The Diffusion of Candidate Gender Quotas Worldwide

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 September 2006

Mona Lena Krook
Affiliation:
Washington University in St. Louis

Abstract

In recent years, more than a hundred countries have adopted quotas for the selection of female candidates to political office. Examining individual cases of quota reform, scholars offer four basic causal stories to explain quota adoption: Women mobilize for quotas to increase women's representation, political elites recognize strategic advantages for supporting quotas, quotas are consistent with existing or emerging notions of equality and representation, and quotas are supported by international norms and spread through transnational sharing. Although most research focuses on the first three accounts, I argue that the fourth offers the greatest potential for understanding the rapid diffusion of gender quota policies, as it explicitly addresses the potential connections among quota campaigns. In a theory-building exercise, I combine empirical work on gender quotas with insights from the international norms literature to identify four distinct international and transnational influences on national quota debates: international imposition, transnational emulation, international tipping, and international blockage. These patterns reveal that domestic debates often have international and transnational dimensions, at the same time that they intersect in distinct ways with international and transnational trends. As work on gender quotas continues to grow, therefore, I call on scholars to move away from simple accounts of diffusion to a recognition of the multiple processes shaping the spread of candidate gender quotas worldwide.I would like to thank Judith Squires, Sarah Childs, Ewan Harrison, and participants in the Institute for Social and Economic Research and Policy Graduate Fellows Workshop at Columbia University, as well as the editors and three anonymous reviewers at Politics & Gender, for their helpful comments. Earlier versions of this article were presented as a paper at the International Studies Association Annual International Convention, Montreal, Canada, March 17–20, 2004, and at the British International Studies Association Annual Conference, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK, December 20–22, 2004.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2006 The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acharya, Amitav. 2004. “How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism.” International Organization 58 (2): 23975.Google Scholar
Alvarez, Sonia. 2000. “Translating the Global: Effects of Transnational Organizing on Latin American Feminist Discourses and Practices.” Meridians: A Journal of Feminisms, Race, Transnationalism 1 (1): 2967.Google Scholar
Araújo, Clara. 2003. “Quotas for Women in the Brazilian Legislative System.” Paper presented at the International IDEA Workshop “The Implementation of Quotas: Latin American Experiences,” Lima, Peru, February 23–24.
Axelrod, Robert. 1986. “An Evolutionary Approach to Norms.” American Political Science Review 80 (4): 10951111.Google Scholar
Baldez, Lisa. 2004. “Elected Bodies: The Adoption of Gender Quota Laws for Legislative Candidates in Mexico.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 29 (2): 23158.Google Scholar
Bauer, Antje. 2002. Afghan Women and the Democratic Reconstruction of Afghanistan: Findings and Interviews from a Journalist's Field Trip. Trans. Dominic Johnson. Berlin: Berghof Research Center for Constructive Conflict Management.
Beckwith, Karen 2003. “The Gendering Ways of States: Women's Representation and State Configuration in France, Great Britain, and the United States.” In Women's Movements Facing the Reconfigured State, ed. Lee Ann Banaszak, Karen Beckwith, and Dieter Rucht. New York: Cambridge University Press, 169202.
Brown, Alice et al. 2002. “Women and Constitutional Change in Scotland and Northern Ireland.” In Women, Politics, and Change, ed. Karen Ross. New York: Oxford University Press, 7184.
Bruhn, Kathleen. 2003. “Whores and Lesbians: Political Activism, Party Strategies, and Gender Quotas in Mexico.” Electoral Studies 22 (1): 10119.Google Scholar
Camacho Granados, Rosalía et al. 1997. Las Cuotas Mínimas de Participación de las Mujeres: Un mecanismo de acción afirmativa. Aportes para la Discusión. 2d ed. San José, Costa Rica: Centro Nacional para el Desarrollo de la Mujer y la Familia.
Carpenter, R. Charli. 2003. “‘Women and Children First’: Gender, Norms, and Humanitarian Evacuation in the Balkans, 1991–95.” International Organization 57 (4): 66194.Google Scholar
Caul, Miki. 2001. “Political Parties and the Adoption of Candidate Gender Quotas: A Cross National Analysis.” Journal of Politics 63 (4): 12141229.Google Scholar
Chama, Mónica. 2001. Las mujeres y el poder. Buenos Aires: Ciudad Argentina.
Checkel, Jeffrey T. 2001. “Why Comply? Social Learning and European Identity Change.” International Organization 55 (3): 55388.Google Scholar
Chowdhury, Najma. 2002. “The Implementation of Quotas: Bangladesh Experience—Dependence and Marginality in Politics.” Paper presented at the International IDEA Workshop “The Implementation of Quotas: Asian Experiences,” Jakarta, Indonesia, September 25.
CIIR [Catholic Institute for International Relations]. 2001. “Where are East Timor's women leaders?http://www.ciir.org/cirr.asp?section=news&page=story&ID=267 (March 5, 2004).
Connell, Dan. 1998. “Strategies for Change: Women & Politics in Eritrea & South Africa.” Review of African Political Economy 25 (76): 189206.Google Scholar
Corrin, Chris. 2002. “Developing Democracy in Kosovo: From Grass Roots to Government.” In Women, Politics, and Change, ed. Karen Ross. New York: Oxford University Press, 99108.
Cortell, Andrew P., and James W. Davis Jr. 1996. “How Do International Institutions Matter? The Domestic Impact of International Rules and Norms.” International Studies Quarterly 40 (4): 45178.Google Scholar
Costa Benavides, Jimena. 2003. “Women's Political Participation in Bolivia: Progress and Obstacles.” Paper presented at the International IDEA Workshop “The Implementation of Quotas: Latin American Experiences,” Lima, Peru, February 23–24.
Dahlerup, Drude, and Lenita Freidenvall. 2005. “Quotas as a ‘Fast Track’ to Equal Representation for Women: Why Scandinavia Is No Longer the Model.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 7 (1): 2648.Google Scholar
Dahlerup, Drude, and Anja Thorup Nordlund. 2004. “Gender Quotas: A Key to Equality? A Case Study of Iraq and Afghanistan.” European Political Science 3 (3): 9198.Google Scholar
Davidson-Schmich, Louise K. 2006. “The Implementation of Political Party Gender Quotas: Evidence from the German Länder 1990–2000.” Party Politics 12 (2): 21132.Google Scholar
Feminist Wire. 2005. “Iraqi Female Candidates Targeted for Violence.” http://www.msmagazine.com/news/printnews.asp?id=8845 (January 20, 2005).
Finnemore, Martha. 1993. “International Organizations as Teachers of Norms: The United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization and Science Policy.” International Organization 47 (4): 56597.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha, and Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change.” International Organization 52 (4): 887917.Google Scholar
Florini, Ann. 1996. “The Evolution of International Norms.” International Studies Quarterly 40 (3): 36389.Google Scholar
García Quesada, Ana Isabel. 2003. “Putting the Mandate into Practice: Legal Reform in Costa Rica.” Paper presented at the International IDEA Workshop “The Implementation of Quotas: Latin American Experiences,” Lima, Peru, February 23–24.
George, Alexander L., and Andrew Bennett. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Global Database of Quotas for Women. 2006. http://www.quotaproject.org (April 30, 2006).
Goetz, Anne Marie, and Shireen Hassim, eds. 2003. No Shortcuts to Power: African Women in Politics and Policy Making. New York: Zed Books.
Harrison, Ewan. 2004. “State Socialization, International Norm Dynamics and the Liberal Peace.” International Politics 41 (4): 52142.Google Scholar
Hassim, Shireen. 2002. “‘A Conspiracy of Women’: The Women's Movement in South Africa's Transition to Democracy.” Social Research 69 (3): 693732.Google Scholar
Hogan, Beatrice. 2004. “Women Winning.” The American Prospect. http://www.prospect.org/webfeatures/2004/03/hogan-b-03-12.html (March 13, 2004).
Howard-Merriam, Kathleen. 1990. “Guaranteed Seats for Political Representation of Women: The Egyptian Example.” Women and Politics 10 (1): 1742.Google Scholar
Htun, Mala N., and Mark P. Jones. 2002. “Engendering the Right to Participate in Decision-Making: Electoral Quotas and Women's Leadership in Latin America.” In Gender and the Politics of Rights and Democracy in Latin America, ed. Nikki Craske and Maxine Molyneux. New York: Palgrave, 3256.
Hunt, Krista. 2002. “The Strategic Co-optation of Women's Rights: Discourse in the ‘War on Terrorism.’ International Feminist Journal of Politics 4 (1): 11621.Google Scholar
Inhetveen, Katharina. 1999. “Can Gender Equality Be Institutionalized? The Role of Launching Values in Institutional Innovation.” International Sociology 14 (4): 40322.Google Scholar
Inter-Parliamentary Union. 2006. “Women in National Parliaments: Situation as of 30 April 2006.” http://www.ipu.org/wmn-e/classif.htm (May 1, 2006).
Joachim, Jutta. 2003. “Framing Issues and Seizing Opportunities: The UN, NGO's, and Women's Rights.” International Studies Quarterly 47 (2): 24774.Google Scholar
Jones, Mark P. 1996. “Increasing Women's Representation Via Gender Quotas: The Argentine Ley de Cupos.” Women and Politics 16 (4): 7598.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret E., and Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Kittilson, Miki Caul. 2006. Challenging Parties, Changing Parliaments: Women and Elected Office in Contemporary Western Europe. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
Klotz, Audie. 1995. “Norms Reconstituting Interests: Global Racial Equality and U.S. Sanctions Against South Africa.” International Organization 49 (3): 45178.Google Scholar
Knox, Kathleen. 2004. “World: More Countries Using Quotas to Boost Number of Women in Politics.” http://www.rferl.org/featuresarticle/2004/02/9a35d64b-2587-4244-9764-86e75590c536.html (February 19, 2004).
Kolinsky, Eva. 1991. “Political Participation and Parliamentary Careers: Women's Quotas in West Germany.” West European Politics 14 (1): 5672.Google Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena. 2003. “Get the Balance Right! Global and Transnational Campaigns to Promote Gender-Balanced Decision-Making.” Paper presented at the International Studies Association Annual Convention, Portland, OR, February 25–March 1.
Krook, Mona Lena. 2004. “Gender Quotas as a Global Phenomenon: Actors and Strategies in Quota Adoption.” European Political Science 3 (3): 5965.Google Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena. 2005. Politicizing Representation: Campaigns for Candidate Gender Quotas Worldwide. Ph.D. diss., Columbia University.
Krook, Mona Lena. Forthcoming. “Candidate Gender Quotas: A Framework for Analysis.” European Journal of Political Research.
Legro, Jeffrey W. 1997. “Which Norms Matter? Revisiting the ‘Failure’ of Internationalism.” International Organization 51 (1): 3163.Google Scholar
Leijenaar, Monique. 1997. How to Create a Gender Balance in Political Decision-making: A Guide to Implementing Policies for Increasing the Participation of Women in Political Decision-making. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
Lokar, Sonia. 2003. Women Can Do It II: Integration of Gender Equality Issues in Parliamentary Parties' Work in South East Europe—2002 Project Report. Novi Sad: yuTOPag.
Lovecy, Jill. 2002. “Gender Mainstreaming and the Framing of Women's Rights in Europe: The Contribution of the Council of Europe.” Feminist Legal Studies 10 (3): 27183.Google Scholar
Lubertino Beltrán, María José. 1992. “Historia de la ‘Ley de Cuotas.’” In Cuotas mínima de participación de mujeres: El debate en Argentina. Buenos Aires: Fundación Friedrich Ebert, 943.
Lyth, Anette. 2001. Getting It Right? A Gender Approach to UNMIK Administration in Kosovo. Stockholm: Kvinna till Kvinna Foundation.
Matland, Richard E., and Kathleen A. Montgomery, eds. 2003. Women's Access to Political Power in Post-Communist Europe. New York: Oxford University Press.
Matland, Richard E., and Donley T. Studlar. 1996. “The Contagion of Women Candidates in Single-Member District and Proportional Representation Electoral Systems: Canada and Norway.” Journal of Politics 58 (3): 70733.Google Scholar
Mazur, Amy G. 2002. Theorizing Feminist Policy. New York: Oxford University Press.
McAdam, Doug, and Dieter Rucht. 1993. “The Cross-National Diffusion of Movement Ideas.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 528: 5674.Google Scholar
Meier, Petra. 2000. “The Evidence of Being Present: Guarantees of Representation and the Belgian Example.” Acta Politica: International Journal of Political Science 35 (1): 6485.Google Scholar
Meier, Petra. 2004. “The Mutual Contagion Effect of Legal and Party Quotas: A Belgian Perspective.” Party Politics 10 (5): 583600.Google Scholar
Millard, Eric, and Laure Ortiz. 1998. “Parité et représentations politiques.” In La Parité: Enjeux et mise en oeuvre, ed. Jacqueline Martin. Toulouse: Presses Universitaires du Mirail, 189203.
Mossuz-Lavau, Janine. 1998. Femmes/hommes pour la parité. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.
Nordlund, Anja Taarup. 2003. “International Implementation of Electoral Gender Quotas in the Balkans—A Fact-Finding Report.” Stockholm University Research Program on Gender Quotas: Working Paper 1.
Opello, Katherine A. R. 2002. Ideas and Elections: Explaining the Timing and Nature of the French Socialist Party's Gender-Based Quota. Ph.D. diss., New York University.
Perrigo, Sarah Perrigo. 1996. “Women and Change in the Labour Party 1979–1995.” Parliamentary Affairs 49 (1): 11629.Google Scholar
Pires, Milena. 2002. “East Timor and the Debate on Quotas.” Paper presented at the International IDEA Workshop “The Implementation of Quotas: Asian Experiences,” Jakarta, Indonesia, September 25.
Powley, Elizabeth. 2003. Strengthening Governance: The Role of Women in Rwanda's Transition. Cambridge, MA: Hunt Alternatives Fund.
Rai, Shirin. 1999. “Democratic Institutions, Political Representation and Women's Empowerment: The Quota Debate in India.” Democratization 6 (3): 8499.Google Scholar
Reyes, Socorro L. 2002. “Quotas for Women for Legislative Seats at the Local Level in Pakistan.” Trans. Wan Azizah. In Perempuan di Parlemen. Bukan Sedekar Jumlah. Stockholm: International IDEA. Bahasa-Indonesia version.
Risse, Thomas, Stephen C. Ropp, and Kathryn Sikkink, eds. 1999. The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Russell, Meg. 2005. Building New Labour: The Politics of Party Organisation. New York: Palgrave.
Saint-Germain, Michelle, and Martha Morgan. 1991. “Equality: Costa Rican Women Demand ‘The Real Thing.’ Women and Politics 11 (3): 2375.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Gregory D. 2003. “The Implementation of Gender Quotas in Peru: Legal Reform, Discourses and Impacts.” Paper presented at the International IDEA Workshop “The Implementation of Quotas: Latin American Experiences,” Lima, Peru, February 23–24.
Sgier, Lea. 2003. “Political Representation and Gender Quotas.” Paper presented at the European Consortium for Political Research, Joint Sessions of Workshops, Edinburgh, Scotland, March 28–April 2.
Sikkink, Kathryn. 1993. “Human Rights, Principled Issue Networks, and Sovereignty in Latin America.” International Organization 47 (3): 41141.Google Scholar
Skjeie, Hege. 1992. Den politiske betydningen av kjønn: En studie av norsk topp-politikk. Oslo: Institute for Social Research.
Stevenson, Linda. 2000. Gender Politics and Policy Process in Mexico, 1968–2000: Symbolic Gains for Women in an Emerging Democracy. Ph.D. diss., University of Pittsburgh.
Strang, David, and John W. Meyer. 1993. “Institutional Conditions for Diffusion.” Theory and Society 22 (4): 487511.Google Scholar
Towns, Ann E. 2004. Norms and Equality in International Society: Global Politics of Women and the State. Ph.D. diss., University of Minnesota.
Tripp, Aili Mari. 2000. Women and Politics in Uganda. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Tripp, Aili Mari. 2004. “Transnational Feminism and Political Representation in Africa.” Paper presented at the American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, September 2–>5.
True, Jacqui, and Michael Mintrom. 2001. “Transnational Networks and Policy Diffusion: The Case of Gender Mainstreaming.” International Studies Quarterly 45 (1): 2757.Google Scholar
United Nations. 1979. Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women. New York: United Nations.
United Nations. 1995. Platform for Action and the Beijing Declaration. New York: United Nations.
Valiente, Celia. 2005. “The Women's Movement, Gender Equality Agencies and Central-State Debates on Political Representation in Spain.” In State Feminism and Political Representation, ed. Joni Lovenduski. New York: Cambridge University Press, 17494.
Wisler, Dominique. 1999. “Parité politique: La diffusion d'un principe.” Swiss Political Science Review 5 (1): 11014.Google Scholar
Yáñez, Ana María. 2003. “Quotas and Democracy in Peru.” Paper presented at the International IDEA Workshop “The Implementation of Quotas: Latin American Experiences,” Lima, Peru, February 23–24.