Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T17:38:06.815Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

(A197) Attitudes toward Public Assistance during a Disaster Among Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2011

H. Sato
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health, Tokyo, Japan
J. Tomio
Affiliation:
Preventive Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan
H. Mizumura
Affiliation:
Asaka, Japan
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Background

Recently, the local governments in Japan implemented the measures for people requiring assistance during a disaster (PRAD). These measures aim to provide public assistance during a disaster for the citizens who registered themselves to the PRAD list in advance, by sharing their personal information among relevant local authorities. However, the needs for such assistance were not clear among chronic disease patients, and there are some concerns about privacy protection in relation to the PRAD list.

Objectives

The objective of this study is to describe the attitudes toward the registration to the PRAD list among rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients.

Methods

Study subjects were the members of a nationwide RA patient group in Japan. Of about 20,000 members, 1,477 who lived in the municipalities affected by disasters from 2004 to 2006 were enrolled. Self-administered questionnaires were sent by mail. The subjects were asked their attitudes toward the registration to the PRAD list and categorized into three groups: (1) no need for assistance; (2) need assistance but will not register; and (3) need assistance and wish to register or already registered. Their concerns about privacy protection as well as socio-demographic and health status were also asked.

Results

Of 1,477, 664 (45%) responded validly, and 596 (40%) answered on their attitudes toward the PRAD list. Of these, 365 (61%) reported they need assistance, though 30% of them (108) did not wish to register. A majority of the subjects concerned about privacy protection among those did not wish to register (65%) as well as among those wished to register (55%). Patients who lived alone, and those with low income were more likely to wish to register.

Conclusions

There are substantial needs for public assistance during a disaster among RA patients although the privacy protection issue would be a barrier to be overcome for successful utilization of the list.

Type
Abstracts of Scientific and Invited Papers 17th World Congress for Disaster and Emergency Medicine
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2011