Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T01:52:04.440Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Disaster Metrics: Quantification of Acute Medical Disasters in Trauma-Related Multiple Casualty Events through Modeling of the Acute Medical Severity Index

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2012

Jamil D. Bayram  and
Shawki Zuabi
Jamil D. Bayram*
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland USA
Shawki Zuabi
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Orange Coast Memorial Medical Center, Orange County, California USA
*
Correspondence: Jamil D. Bayram, MD, MPH, EMDM, MEd Johns Hopkins School of Medicine 5801 Smith Avenue Davis Building, Suite 3220 Baltimore, Maryland 21209 USA E-mail jbayram1@jhmi.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction

The interaction between the acute medical consequences of a Multiple Casualty Event (MCE) and the total medical capacity of the community affected determines if the event amounts to an acute medical disaster.

Hypothesis/Problem

There is a need for a comprehensive quantitative model in MCE that would account for both prehospital and hospital-based acute medical systems, leading to the quantification of acute medical disasters. Such a proposed model needs to be flexible enough in its application to accommodate a priori estimation as part of the decision-making process and a posteriori evaluation for total quality management purposes.

Methods

The concept proposed by de Boer et al in 1989, along with the disaster metrics quantitative models proposed by Bayram et al on hospital surge capacity and prehospital medical response, were used as theoretical frameworks for a new comprehensive model, taking into account both prehospital and hospital systems, in order to quantify acute medical disasters.

Results

A quantitative model called the Acute Medical Severity Index (AMSI) was developed. AMSI is the proportion of the Acute Medical Burden (AMB) resulting from the event, compared to the Total Medical Capacity (TMC) of the community affected; AMSI = AMB/TMC. In this model, AMB is defined as the sum of critical (T1) and moderate (T2) casualties caused by the event, while TMC is a function of the Total Hospital Capacity (THC) and the medical rescue factor (R) accounting for the hospital-based and prehospital medical systems, respectively. Qualitatively, the authors define acute medical disaster as “a state after any type of Multiple Casualty Event where the Acute Medical Burden (AMB) exceeds the Total Medical Capacity (TMC) of the community affected.” Quantitatively, an acute medical disaster has an AMSI value of more than one (AMB / TMC > 1). An acute medical incident has an AMSI value of less than one, without the need for medical surge. An acute medical emergency has an AMSI value of less than one with utilization of surge capacity (prehospital or hospital-based). An acute medical crisis has an AMSI value between 0.9 and 1, approaching the threshold for an actual medical disaster.

Conclusion

A novel quantitative taxonomy in MCE has been proposed by modeling the Acute Medical Severity Index (AMSI). This model accounts for both hospital and prehospital systems, and quantifies acute medical disasters. Prospective applications of various components of this model are encouraged to further verify its applicability and validity.

Bayram JD, Zuabi S. Disaster metrics: quantification of acute medical disasters in trauma-related multiple casualty events through modeling of the Acute Medical Severity Index. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2012;27(2):1-6.

Keywords

disaster metricsdisaster quantificationmultiple casualtydisaster modelingmedical severity indexdisaster management
Type
Original Research
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , April 2012 , pp. 130 - 135
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Turégano-Fuentes, F, Pérez-Diaz, D, Sanz-Sánchez, M, et al. . Overall assessment of the response to the terrorist bombings in trains, Madrid, 11 March 2004. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2008;5:433-441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Aylwin, CJ, König, TC, Brennan, NW, et al. . Reduction in critical mortality in urban mass casualty incidents: analysis of triage, surge, and resource use after the London bombings on July 7, 2005. Lancet. 2006;368:2219-2225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Kaji, A, Koenig, KL, Bey, T. Surge capacity for healthcare systems: a conceptual framework. Acad Emerg Med. 2006;13(11):1157-1159.Google Scholar
4. Wise, RA. The creation of emergency health care standards for catastrophic events. Acad Emerg Med. 2006;13(11):1150-1152.Google Scholar
5. Frykberg, ER. Principles of mass casualty management following terrorist disasters. Ann Surg. 2004;239(3):319-321.Google Scholar
6. Arnold, JL, Tsai, MC, Halpern, P, et al. . Mass casualty, terrorist bombings: epidemiological outcomes, resource utilization, and time course of emergency needs (Part I). Prehosp Disaster Med. 2003;18(3):220-234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Levi, L, Michaelson, M, Admi, H, et al. . National strategy for mass casualty situations and its effects on the hospital. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2002;17(1):12-16.Google Scholar
8. Frykberg, ER. Medical management of disasters and mass casualties from terrorist bombings: how can we cope? J Trauma. 2002;53(2):201-212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Hirshberg, A, Holcomb, JB, Mattox, KL. Hospital trauma care in multiple casualty incidents: a critical view. Ann Emerg Med. 2001;37(6):647-652.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Frykberg, ER, Tepas, JJ. Terrorist bombings: lessons learned from Belfast to Beirut. Ann Surg. 1988;208(5):569-576.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. de Boer, J, Van Remmen, J. Handbook of Disaster Medicine. Utrecht: Van der Wees; 2000.Google Scholar
12. de Boer, J. Order in chaos: modeling medical management in disasters. Eur J Emerg Med. 1999;6:141-148.Google Scholar
13. Rutherford, WH. Proceedings from the international working party on the definition and classification of disasters. Brighton, England: International Trauma Foundation; 1980.Google Scholar
14. Debacker, M. Definition of disaster and disaster medicine. http://www.aresmarche.it/archivio-pubblico/altro/def_disaster.pdf. University of Leuven, Belgium. Accessed November 10, 2011.Google Scholar
15. Rutherford, WH, de Boer, J. The definition and classification of disasters. Injury. 1983;15(1):10-12.Google Scholar
16. Quarantelli, E. What is disaster? The need for clarification in definition, conceptualization in research. In: Sowder B, Lystad M, eds, Disasters and Mental Health: Selected Contemporary Perspectives. Rockville, Maryland, USA: National Institute of Mental Health; 1986:49-81.Google Scholar
17. Al-Madhari, AF, Keller, AZ. Review of disaster definitions. Prehosp Disaster Med. 1997;12(1):17-21.Google Scholar
18. de Boer, J. Definition and classification of disasters: introduction of a disaster severity scale. J Emerg Med. 1990;8(5):591-595.Google Scholar
19. Shaluf, IM, Ahmadum, F, Said, AM. A review of disaster and crisis. Disaster Prev Manage. 2003;12(1):24-32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Quarantelli, EL. What should we study? Questions and suggestions for researchers about the concept of disasters. IJMED. 1987;5:7-32.Google Scholar
21. Taylor, AJW. Towards the classification of disasters and victims. Traumatology. 1999;5:12-25.Google Scholar
22. Perry, R. “What is a disaster?” In: Rodriguez H, Quarantelli EL, Dynes RR, eds, Handbook of Disaster Research. New York: Springer; 2006:1-15.Google Scholar
23. Task Force on Quality Control of Disaster Management; World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine; Nordic Society for Disaster Medicine. Health disaster management: guidelines for evaluation and research in the Utstein Style. Volume 1. Conceptual Framework of Disasters. Prehosp Disast Med. 2003;17(s3):1-177.Google Scholar
24. de Boer, J, Brismar, B, Eldar, R, et al. . The medical severity index of disasters. J Emerg Med. 1989;7:269-273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25. Newgard, CD, Sears, GK, Rea, TD, et al. . The Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Epistry-Trauma: design, development, and implementation of a North American epidemiologic out-of-hospital trauma registry. Resuscitation. 2008;78:170-178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. Farmer, JC, Carlton, PK Jr. Providing critical care during a disaster: the interface between disaster response agencies and hospitals. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(3 Suppl):S56-S59.Google Scholar
27. Hines, S, Payne, A, Edmondson, J, et al. . Bombs under London. The EMS response plan that worked. JEMS. 2005;30:58-67.Google ScholarPubMed
28. Smiley, DR, Loboda, A, Starling, C, et al. . Transformation from planning to operations: emergency medical services in disaster response. Ann Disaster Med. 2004;3:11-12.Google Scholar
29. Asaeda, G. The day that the START triage system came to a STOP: observations from the World Trade Center disaster. Acad Emerg Med. 2002;9:255-256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30. Einav, S, Feigenberg, Z, Weissman, C, et al. . Evacuation priorities in mass casualty terror-related events: implications for contingency planning. Ann Surg. 2004;239:304-310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31. Cook, L. The World Trade Center attack. The paramedic response: an insider's view. Crit Care. 2001;5:301-303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32. Grande, CM, de Boer, J, Polk, JD, et al. . In: Soreide E, Grande CM. Prehospital Trauma Care. New York: Informa HealthCare; 2001:99-130.Google Scholar
33. Branas, CC, MacKenzie, EJ, ReVelle, CS. A trauma resource allocation model for ambulances and hospitals. Health Serv Res. 2000;35(2):489-507.Google Scholar
34. Beyersdorf, SR, Nania, JN, Luna, GK. Community medical response to the Fairchild mass casualty event. Am J Surg. 1996;171:467-470.Google Scholar
35. Ricci, E, Pretto, E. Assessment of prehospital and hospital response in disaster. Crit Care Clin. 1991;7(2):471-484.Google Scholar
36. Doyle, CJ. Mass casualty incident. Integration with prehospital care. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 1990;8(1):163-175.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37. Bayram, JD, Zuabi, S, Subbarao, I. Disaster metrics: quantitative benchmarking of hospital surge capacity in trauma-related Multiple Casualty Events. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2011;5(2):117-124.Google Scholar
38. Bayram, JD, Zuabi, S. Disaster metrics: a proposed quantitative model for benchmarking prehospital medical response in trauma-related Multiple Casualty Events. Prehosp Disaster Med. In press.Google Scholar
39. Donabedian, A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. The Milbank Quarterly. 2005;83(4):691-729.Google Scholar
40. de Boer, Jan, Debacker, M. A more rational approach to medical disaster management applied retrospectively to the Enschede fireworks disaster, 13 May 2000. Eur J Emerg Med. 2003;10(2):117-123.Google Scholar
41. Greenberg, MI, Hendrickson, RG; CIMERC; Drexel University Emergency Department Terrorism Preparedness Consensus Panel. Report of the CIMERC/Drexel University Emergency Department Terrorism Preparedness Consensus Panel. Acad Emerg Med. 2003;10(7):783-788.Google ScholarPubMed