Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-5r2nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T05:46:22.235Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fraudulent Evidence at the International Court of Justice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2017

Cecily Rose
Cecily Rose*
Affiliation:
Grotius Centre for International Legal Studies, Leiden Law School
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Inaugural Detlev F. Vagts Roundtable on Transnational Law: Transnational Professional Ethics
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 110 , 2016 , pp. 329 - 332
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 W. Michael Reisman & Christina Parajon Skinner, Fraudulent Evidence Before Public International Tribunals: The Dirty Stories of International Law 179, 191 (2014).

2 Id. at 8–9.

3 Maritime Delimitation and Territorial Questions Between Qatar and Bahrain (Qatar v. Bahr.), Merits, Judgment, 2001 ICJ Rep. 40, paras. 15–23 (Mar. 16).

4 Id., paras. 15–16.

5 Id., para. 18.

6 Id., para. 19.

7 Id., para. 20.

8 Id., para. 23.

9 Id., para. 20.

10 Id.

11 Maritime Delimitation and Territorial Questions Between Qatar and Bahrain (Qatar v. Bahr.), Order, 1999 ICJ Rep. 3, 7 (Feb. 17).

12 Qatar v. Bahr., 2001 ICJ Rep. at 40, paras. 15–23.

13 Rules of Court of the International Court of Justice, Rule 67(2).