Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:06:40.924Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Remarks by H.R.H. Prince Zeid Ra’ad Zeid Al Hussein

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

H. R. H. Prince Zeid Ra’ad Zeid Al Hussein
H. R. H. Prince Zeid Ra’ad Zeid Al Hussein*
Affiliation:
Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan to the United Nations Consultative Committee for the United Nations Development Fund for Women (UNIFEM) United Nations on Sexual Exploitation and Abuse in UN Peacekeeping Operations Assembly of States Parties to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Peace v. Justice: Contradictory or Complementary
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 100 , 2006 , pp. 362 - 368
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Robertson, Geoffrey, Crimes Against Humanity: The Struggle for Global Justice 221-22 (1999)Google Scholar.

2 Id. at 254.

3 Id. at 224.

4 See Snyder, Jack & Vinjamuri, Leslie, Trials and Errors: Principle and Pragmatism in Strategies of International Justice, Int’l Security 20 (Winter 2004)Google Scholar.

5 See Gropengeißer, Helmut & Meißner, Jörg, Amnesties and the Rome Statute, in Essays on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court 183 (Lattanzi, Flavia & Schabas, William A. eds., 2004)Google Scholar.

6 For an in-depth analysis of Uganda’s voluntary referral of its situation to the ICC, a type of referral unanticipated by the negotiators of the Rome Statute, see Arsanjani, Mahnoush H. & Reisman, W. Michael, The Law-in-Action of the International Criminal Court, 99 AJIL 385, 391-97 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Comments on prosecutorial policy are found on page 391.

7 Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court Art. 53 § 2(c), July 17, 1998 [hereinafter Rome Statute].

8 Id., Art. 53(l)(c); see also id., Art. 53(2)(c).

9 See ICC-ASP/4/32, at 329, Arts. 50(a)(i), 50(a)(ii), 50(b).

10 Gropengeißer & Meißner, supra note 5, at 188; see also Bergsmo, Morten & Pejic, Jelena, Article 16 Deferral of Investigation or Prosecution, in Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Observers’ Notes, Article by Article 373 (Triffterer, Otto ed., 1999)Google Scholar.