Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:49:43.320Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

RELEVANCE OF PRODUCT INTEGRATION IN SCALED AGILE MECHATRONIC PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT

Part of: Design Organisation and Management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2020

J. I. Schrof ,
F. Rathert  and
K. Paetzold
J. I. Schrof*
Affiliation:
Bundeswehr University Munich, Germany
F. Rathert
Affiliation:
Technische Hochschule Köln, Germany
K. Paetzold
Affiliation:
Bundeswehr University Munich, Germany
*
*julian.schrof@unibw.de

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Industrial automotive development differs significantly from ideal agile conditions. Complex development structures, interlinkages between teams and non-functional physical dependencies between components result in agile constraints of scale and physicality. This qualitative study researches the influence of the product integration process on these constraints. The results show, that automotive integration characteristics such as duration, frequency, scope and transparency fail agile requirements and therefore cause constraints. Alternatives regarding IT and process design are discussed.

Keywords

agile product developmentproduct integrationlarge-scale engineering systemsnew product developmentprocess improvement
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference , Volume 1 , May 2020 , pp. 717 - 726
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Abrahamsson, A.P., Salo, O. and Ronkainen, J. (2002), Agile Software Development Methods : Review and Analysis, VTT Publication.Google Scholar
Alqudah, M. and Razali, R. (2016), “A Review of Scaling Agile Methods in Large Software Development”, International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, Vol. 6 No. 6, p. 828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, K. and Beedle, M. (2001), “Manifesto for Agile Software Development”, available at: http://agilemanifesto.org/history.html.Google Scholar
Bogner, A., Littig, B. and Menz, W. (2014), Qualitative Sozialforschung, Qualitative Sozialforschung, Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag Verlag, München, available at: https://doi.org/10.1524/9783486717594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Böhmer, A., Beckmann, A. and Lindemann, U. (2015), “Open Innovation Ecosystem - Makerspaces within an Agile Innovation Process”, ISPIM Innovation Summit, No. December.Google Scholar
Vom Brocke, J. et al. (2009), “Reconstructing the Giant: on the Importance of Rigour in Documenting the Literature Search Process”, European Conference of Information Systems (ECIS), pp. 1–1.Google Scholar
Cao, L. et al. (2004), “How extreme does extreme Programming have to be? Adapting XP practices to large-scale projects”, Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Vol. 37 No. February, pp. 1335–1344.Google Scholar
Conboy, K. (2010), “Method and Developer Characteristics for Effective Agile Method Tailoring : A Study of XP Expert Opinion”, Vol. 20 No. 1, available at: https://doi.org/10.1145/1767751.1767753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dikert, K., Paasivaara, M. and Lassenius, C. (2016), “Challenges and success factors for large-scale agile transformations: A systematic literature review”, Journal of Systems and Software, Elsevier Inc., Vol. 119,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dingsøyr, T. and Moe, N.B. (2013), “Research challenges in large-scale agile software development”, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, Vol. 38 No. 5, p. 38.Google Scholar
Dingsøyr, T. and Moe, N.B. (2014), “Towards Principles of Large-Scale Agile Development - A Summary of the Workshop at XP2014 and a Revised Research Agenda”, Agile Methods. Large-Scale Development, Refactoring, Testing, and Estimation, Vol. 199, pp. 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dybå, T. and Dingsøyr, T. (2008), “Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review”, Information and Software Technology, Vol. 50 No. 9-10, pp. 833–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebert, C. and Paasivaara, M. (2017), “Scaling Agile”, IEEE Software, Vol. 34 No. 6, pp. 98–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eklund, U. and Berger, C. (2017), “Scaling agile development in mechatronic organizations - A comparative case study”, Proceedings - 2017 IEEE/ACM 39th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice Track, ICSE-SEIP 2017, pp. 173–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eklund, U., Olsson, H.H. and Strøm, N.J. (2014), “Industrial challenges of scaling agile in mass-produced embedded systems”, Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, Vol. 199, pp. 30–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furuhjelm, J. et al. (2017), “Owning the Sky with agile: Building a Jet Fighter Faster, Cheaper, Better with Scrum”, pp. 1–4.Google Scholar
Janes, A. and Succi, G. (2012), “The dark side of agile software development”, SPLASH 2012: Onward! 2012 - Proceedings of the ACM International Symposium on New Ideas, New Paradigms, and Reflections on Programming and Software, pp. 215–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagermann, H. (2015), “Change Through Digitization—Value Creation in the Age of Industry 4.0”, Management of Permanent Change , Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, pp. 23–45.Google Scholar
Kruchten, P. (2013), “Contextualizing agile software development”, Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, Vol. 25 No. 4, pp. 351–361.Google Scholar
Mayring, P. (2010), Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse - Grundlage Und Techniken, 12th ed, BELTZ.Google Scholar
Moen, R. and Norman, C. (2009), “Evolution of the PDCA Cycle”, Society, pp. 1–11.Google Scholar
Ovesen, N. (2012), “The Challenges of Becoming Agile: Implementing and Conducting SCRUM in Integrated Product Development”, p. 200.Google Scholar
Pikkarainen, M. et al. (2008), “The impact of agile practices on communication in software development”, Empirical Software Engineering, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 303–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royce, D.W.W. (1970), “Managing the Development of large Software Systems”, Ieee Wescon, No. August.Google Scholar
Runeson, P. and Höst, M. (2009), “Guidelines for conducting and reporting case study research in software engineering”, pp. 131–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, T.S. et al. (2019), Agile Development of Physical Products: An Empirical Study about Potentials, Transition and Applicability, Munich, available at: www.unibw.de/itpe.Google Scholar
Sekitoleko, N. et al. (2014), “Technical Dependency in Large-Scale Agile Software Development”, International Conference on Agile Software Development, pp. 46–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyszkiewicz, R. and Pawlak-wolanin, A. (2017), “Agile Organization as a concept of production adjustment in the face of the crisis”, Production Engineering Archives Issn, Vol. 15, pp. 19–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uludag, O. et al. (2018), “Identifying and structuring challenges in large-scale agile development based on a structured literature review”, Proceedings - 2018 IEEE 22nd International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference, EDOC 2018, pp. 191–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiest, S. (2010), Continuous Integration Mit Hudson/Jenkins: Grundlagen Und Praxiswissen Für Einsteiger Und Umsteiger, dpunkt, Heidelberg.Google Scholar