Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-30T22:03:59.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

AFFECTIVE LEARNING GOALS – KEY FOR TEACHING SUSTAINABLE PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2023

Ludger Heide ,
Anne Magdalene Syré ,
Alexander Grahle ,
Dietmar Göhlich ,
Daniela Kattwinkel  and
Beate Bender
Ludger Heide*
Affiliation:
TU Berlin;
Anne Magdalene Syré
Affiliation:
TU Berlin;
Alexander Grahle
Affiliation:
TU Berlin;
Dietmar Göhlich
Affiliation:
TU Berlin;
Daniela Kattwinkel
Affiliation:
Ruhr-Universität Bochum
Beate Bender
Affiliation:
Ruhr-Universität Bochum
*
Heide, Ludger, TU Berlin, Germany, ludger.heide-conftool@lhtechnologies.de

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Sustainability in engineering sciences is of rapidly growing importance. However, its integration into engineering education is still in its infancy. This paper is based on the finding that, in addition to conventional cognitive learning outcomes, affective outcomes like mindset and attitude play a major role in teaching sustainability effectively. We present the didactical theory behind this and the evaluation of two university courses which serve as practical examples and research objects. These course puts high importance on affective learning outcomes, teaching not only design and assessment methods but also encourages students to reflect sustainability goals in broader contexts. We describe the theoretical course design following the principle of constructive alignment and conducted a quantitative and qualitative evaluation of the learning outcomes. The evaluation results confirm the importance of affective learning goals but also point out the need for further improvements to the course, which were implemented and re-evaluated.

Keywords

SustainabilityDesign educationSocial responsibility
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 3: ICED23 , July 2023 , pp. 485 - 494
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

acatech (2021), Circular Economy Roadmap for Germany, Technical report. https://en.acatech.de/publication/circular-economy-roadmap-for-germany/Google Scholar
Anderson, L.W. and Krathwohl, D.R. (Editors) (2000), A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing, Longman, New York, abridged edition.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Alexander, Muller Werder, Claude, Javet, Fabienne and Woschnack, Ute (2016), Criteria to Assess Professional, Methodological, Social & Self-Competence, Innovation in Higher & Professional Education 5, ZHAW Zurcher Hochschule fur Angewandte Wissenschaften. http://doi.org/10.21256/ZHAW-1145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biggs, J. (2003), Aligning teaching for constructing learning, Report, Higher Education Academy. https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/aligning-teaching-constructing-learningGoogle Scholar
Bloom, B.S., Engelhart, M.D., Furst, E.J., Hill, W.H. and Krathwohl, D.R. (1956), Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals, David McKay Company, New York.Google Scholar
Ertel, H. (2008), Lehre, Lernen und Assessment, chapter 1, Haupt Verlag AG, pp. 13–46.Google Scholar
European Commission (2022), Green Deal: New proposals to make sustainable products the norm and boost Europe's resource independence, Press Release IP/22/2013.Google Scholar
Jungmann, T. (2011), Forschendes Lernen im Logistikstudium, Ph.D. thesis, Universitat Dortmund.Google Scholar
Kattwinkel, D. (2022), Umweltgerechte Produktentwicklung, Ph.D. thesis, Ruhr-Universitat Bochum. https://www.dr.hut-verlag.de/978-3-8439-5236-1.htmlGoogle Scholar
Kattwinkel, D., Heide, L., Syre, A., Grahle, A., Bender, B. and Gohlich, D. (2021), “Sustainability in engineering design - description and comparison of two university courses”, Proceedings of the Design Society, Vol. 1, p. 2861–2870. http://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2021.547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kattwinkel, D., Song, Y.W. and Bender, B. (2018), “Analysis of ecodesign and sustainable design in higher education”, in: Proceedings of the DESIGN 2018 15th International Design Conference, The Design Society, Glasgow, UK. https://doi.org/10.21278/idc.2018.0305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krathwohl, D.R., Bloom, B.S. and Masia, B.B. (1964), Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals, HandookII: Affective domain, David McKay, New York.Google Scholar
McAloone, T. and Bey, N. (2009), Environmental improvement through product development: A guide, Danish Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
Paschel, F., Wipper, A. and Pfetsch, J. (2021), Theoretisch-konzeptionelle Analyse von digitalen Lernangeboten zur Studienvorbereitung internationaler Studieninteressierter anhand eines systematischen Analyserasters, Technical report, Verbundprojekt Digitaler Campus. http://doi.org/10.14279/DEP0SIT0NCE-11875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritter-Mamczek, B. (2016), Stoff reduzieren, utb, 2 edition.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaper, N., Hilkenheimer, F. and Bender, E. (2013), Umsetzungshilfen fur kompetenzorientiertes Prufen, Fachgutachten, Hochschulrektorenkonferenz. https://www.hrk-nexus.de/fileadmin/redaktion/hrk-nexus/07-Downloads/07-02-Publikationen/Zusatzgutachten-Kompetenzorientiertes-Pruefen.pdfGoogle Scholar
Shephard, K. (2008), “Higher education for sustainability: seeking affective learning outcomes”, Vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 87–98. http://doi.org/10.1108/14676370810842201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations (2015), Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, Resolution 70/1, General Assembly.Google Scholar