Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T07:50:41.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Alignment of the functional structure with sustainability aspects in product development – combining the strengths of the functional structure with the MECO matrix

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2024

Björn Kokoschko ,
Laura Augustin ,
Michael Schabacker  and
Christiane Beyer
Björn Kokoschko*
Affiliation:
Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Germany
Laura Augustin
Affiliation:
Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Germany
Michael Schabacker
Affiliation:
Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Germany
Christiane Beyer
Affiliation:
Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Germany
*
bjoern.kokoschko@ovgu.de

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Many of the methods and tools proposed in the literature for validating product concepts are matrix-based, but they do not allow the results to be communicated easily and comprehensibly. This is a major obstacle to the integration of such methods. The poor communication of the results of a method therefore represents great potential for better integration of sustainability aspects in product development. In this article, an approach is proposed on how the results of the MECO matrix can be converted into a clear visualization of the reduced environmental assessments.

Keywords

MECO-matrixfunction structureproduct developmentsustainable designmethodical design
Type
Design for Sustainability
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 4: DESIGN 2024 , May 2024 , pp. 1329 - 1338
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2024.

References

Bhamra, Tracy; Lofthouse, Vicky (2007): Design for Sustainability. A Practical Approach. 1st ed. Aldershot: Gower Publishing Limited (Design for Social Responsibility). Available online at https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gbv/detail.action?docID=4513076.Google Scholar
Brezet, J. C.; Bijma, A. S.; Ehrenfeld, J.; Silvester, S. (2001): The Design of Eco-Efficient Services. Method, tools and review of the case study based ‘Designing Eco-efficient Services’ project. Edited by Delft University of Technology. Delft University of Technology.Google Scholar
Council Directive 67/548/. Listen over farlige stoffer, Effekliste, Listen over uonskede stoffer, Miljestyrelsen 2000 a,b,c EECdangerous substances (1967). Available online at http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/1967/548/oj.Google Scholar
Ehrlenspiel, Klaus; Meerkamm, Harald (2017): Integrierte Produktentwicklung. Denkabläufe, Methodeneinsatz, Zusammenarbeit. 6., überarbeitete und erweiterte Auflage: Carl Hanser Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gericke, K; Eisenbart, B. (2017): The integrated function modeling framework and its relation to function structures. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing. 2017;31(4):436-457. https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S089006041700049XGoogle Scholar
Gericke, Kilian; Bender, B.; Pahl, Gerhard; Beitz, Wolfgang; Feldhusen, Jörg; Grote, Karl-Heinrich (2021): Funktionen und deren Strukturen. In Bender, Beate, Gericke, Kilian (Eds.): Pahl/Beitz Konstruktionslehre. Methoden und Anwendung erfolgreicher Produktentwicklung. 9. Aufl. 2021. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Grote, Karl-Heinrich (Hg.) (2011): Dubbel. Taschenbuch für den Maschinenbau, mit …Tabellen. 23., neu bearb. u. erw. Aufl. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guérineau, Benjamin; Rivest, Louis; Bricogne, Matthieu; Durupt, Alexandre; Eynard, Benoît (2018): Towards a design-method selection framework for multidisciplinary product development. In : Proceedings of the DESIGN 2018 15th International Design Conference. 15th International Design Conference, May, 21-24, 2018: Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, University of Zagreb, Croatia; The Design Society, Glasgow, UK (Design Conference Proceedings), pp. 2879–2890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochschorner, Elisabeth; Finnveden, Göran (2003): Evaluation of two simplified Life Cycle assessment methods. In Int J Life Cycle Assess 8 (3), pp. 119–128. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02978456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Listen over uønskede stoffer 2009 (2010). Version 1.0: Miljøstyrelsen (Orientering fra Miljøstyrelsen, nr. 3, 2010).Google Scholar
Masui, Keijiro; Sakao, Tomohiko ; Kobayashi, Mitsuru ; INABA, Atsushi: Applying Quality Function Deployment to environmentally conscious design. In: International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 20 (2003), Nr. 1, S. 90–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAloone, Tim; Bey, Niki (2009): Environmental improvement through product development. A guide: [Environmental Protection Agency].Google Scholar
Pohle, Horst (1997): PVC und Umwelt. Eine Bestandsaufnahme. 1st ed. 1997. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Springer eBook Collection).Google Scholar
Pommer, K.; Bech, P.; Wenzel, H.; Caspersen, N.; Olsen, S. I. (2003): Handbook on Environmental Assessment of Products. Edited by Dänisches Umweltministerium.Google Scholar
Ross, Douglas T., and Schoman, Kenneth E. Jr. (1977): "Structured analysis for requirements definition." Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions on 1: 6-15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, Willfried; Vetter, Michael (2001): PVC in der Müllverbrennung August 2001. Available online at https://www.krv.de/system/files/joomla/PVCinderMllverbrennung_agpu.pdf.Google Scholar
Sakao, Tomohiko: A QFD-centred design methodology for environmentally conscious product design. In: International Journal of Production Research 45 (2007), 18-19, S. 4143–4162Google Scholar
Stefanov, Stiliyan (2017): Application of "MET Matrix" Method in outlining the environmental aspects of a ne insulation composite material. In : Journal of Chemical Technology and Metallurgy. Students Town „Hristo Botev”, 1700 Sofa, Bulgaria E-mail: University of National and World Economy,Department of Economics of Natural Resources. Sofia, pp. 969–974.Google Scholar
Tischner, Ursula; Moser, Heidrun (2015): Was ist EcoDesign? Available online at https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/publikationen/was-ist-ecodesign.Google Scholar
Vajna, Sándor (Ed.) (2022): Integrated Design Engineering. Interdisziplinäre und ganzheitliche Produktentwicklung. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenzel, Henrik (1998): Application dependency of lca methodology: Key variables and their mode of influencing the method. In Int J Life Cycle Assess 3 (5), pp. 281–288. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02979837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar