Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T04:02:14.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

DIAGNOSIS OF DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES FOR REFRIGERATION SOCIO-TECHNICAL SYSTEM USING THE RADICAL INNOVATION DESIGN METHODOLOGY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2021

Yasmine Salehy ,
Bernard Yannou ,
Yann Leroy ,
François Cluzel ,
Laurence Fournaison ,
Hong-Minh Hoang ,
Robin Lecomte  and
Anthony Delahaye
Yasmine Salehy*
Affiliation:
Université Paris-Saclay, CentraleSupélec, Laboratoire Genie Industriel, Gif-sur-Yvette, France Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, FRISE, 92761, Antony, France
Bernard Yannou
Affiliation:
Université Paris-Saclay, CentraleSupélec, Laboratoire Genie Industriel, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
Yann Leroy
Affiliation:
Université Paris-Saclay, CentraleSupélec, Laboratoire Genie Industriel, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
François Cluzel
Affiliation:
Université Paris-Saclay, CentraleSupélec, Laboratoire Genie Industriel, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
Laurence Fournaison
Affiliation:
Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, FRISE, 92761, Antony, France
Hong-Minh Hoang
Affiliation:
Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, FRISE, 92761, Antony, France
Robin Lecomte
Affiliation:
Université Paris-Saclay, CentraleSupélec, Laboratoire Genie Industriel, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
Anthony Delahaye
Affiliation:
Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, FRISE, 92761, Antony, France
*
Salehy, Yasmine, Université Paris Saclay, Design Engineering, France, yasmine.salehy@centralesupelec.fr

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A refrigerant system (like that of a supermarket) is a complex system if we consider all the stakeholders throughout its lifecycle phases (use, maintenance, technological update, end of life). The lack of stakeholders' interaction during the design and other lifecycle stages of such a system generates issues and leads to sub-optimal system performances. We used the RID methodology to identify the main areas for improvement for these activities related to the refrigerant system. It is precisely designed to analyze, within the scope of activity, the major stakeholders' problems (user profiles) during lifecycle phases (use situations) to deduce areas for improvement (value buckets). Therefore, we built a process of interviews and data collection on existing practices to feed into a RID model. The first results are an archetypal description of the actors and problems encountered according to the lifecycle phases. The second part is a prioritized mapping of the areas to improve despite a certain number of known available solutions but proven insufficient.

Keywords

Sociotechnical systemInnovationRefrigerationUser centred designEvaluation
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 1: ICED21 , August 2021 , pp. 1263 - 1272
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Aprea, C., Greco, A., Maiorino, A., 2012. An experimental evaluation of the greenhouse effect in the substitution of R134a with CO2. Energy 45, 753–761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2012.07.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ardente, F., Calero Pastor, M., Mathieux, F., Talens Peiró, L., 2015. Analysis of end-of-life treatments of commercial refrigerating appliances: Bridging product and waste policies. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 101, 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bahman, A., Rosario, L., Rahman, M.M., 2012. Analysis of energy savings in a supermarket refrigeration/HVAC system. Applied Energy 98, 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.02.043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bekhradi, A., Yannou, B., Cluzel, F., Vallette, T., 2017. Categorizing user pains, usage situations and existing solutions in front end of innovation: the case of smart lighting project, in: 21st International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 17). Vancouver, Canada.Google Scholar
Ben-Abdallah, R., Leducq, D., Hoang, H.M., Fournaison, L., Pateau, O., Ballot-Miguet, B., Delahaye, A., 2019. Experimental investigation of the use of PCM in an open display cabinet for energy management purposes. Energy Conversion and Management 198, 111909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2019.111909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cagno, E., Neri, A., Howard, M., Brenna, G., Trianni, A., 2019. Industrial sustainability performance measurement systems: A novel framework. Journal of Cleaner Production 230, 1354–1375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, J.A., Hammond, E.C., Gigiel, A.J., Fostera, A.M., Reinholdt, L., Fikiin, K., Zilio, C., 2014. Assessment of methods to reduce the energy consumption of food cold stores. Applied Thermal Engineering 62, 697–705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2013.10.023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ge, Y.T., Tassou, S.A., 2011. Performance evaluation and optimal design of supermarket refrigeration systems with supermarket model “SuperSim”, Part I: Model description and validation. International Journal of Refrigeration 34, 527–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2010.11.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesloin, C., Perry, N., Perrot-Bernardet, V., 2017. Consideration of value chain actors in the analysis of environmental performance for eco-design and incentive for sustainable behavior: case study of energy-using products road transport refrigeration units. Ecole nationale supérieure d'arts et métiers - ENSAM.Google Scholar
IEA, 2018. The future of cooling. International Energy Agency, Paris.Google Scholar
Islam, Md. A., Srinivasan, K., Thu, K., Saha, B.B., 2017. Assessment of total equivalent warming impact (TEWI) of supermarket refrigeration systems. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 42, 26973–26983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.07.035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, W.C., Mauborgne, R., 2005. Value innovation: a leap into the blue ocean. Journal of business strategy.Google Scholar
Kolokotroni, M., Mylona, Z., Evans, J., Foster, A., Liddiard, R., 2019. Supermarket Energy Use in the UK. Energy Procedia 161, 325–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2019.02.108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamé, G., Leroy, Y., Yannou, B., 2017. Ecodesign tools in the construction sector: Analyzing usage inadequacies with designers’ needs. Journ. of Cleaner Prod. 148, 60–72, https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamé, G., Yannou, B., Cluzel, F., 2018. Usage-driven problem design for radical innovation in healthcare. BMJ Innovations.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mignon, I., Bergek, A., 2016. System- and actor-level challenges for diffusion of renewable electricity technologies: an international comparison. Journal of Cleaner Production 128, 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NF EN 378 - Refrigerating systems and heat pumps - Safety and environmental requirements, 2017. European Committee for Standardisation.Google Scholar
Pahl, G., Beitz, W., 2013. Engineering design: a systematic approach. Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
Pärttö, M., Saariluoma, P., 2012. Explaining failures in innovative thought processes in engineering design. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 41, 442–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.04.053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saaksvuori, A., Immonen, A., 2008. Product lifecycle management. Springer Science & Business Media.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salehy, Y., Leroy, Y., Cluzel, F., Hoang, H.-M., Fournaison, L., Delahaye, A., Yannou, B., 2019. Life cycle assessment of hypermarket refrigeration system: effet of location and choice of architecture, in: AvniR Conference. Lille, France.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, R., Szklo, A.S., Pereira de Lucena, A.F., Moreira Cesar Borba, B.S., Pupo Nogueira, L.P., Fleming, F.P., Troccoli, A., Harrison, M., Boulahya, M.S., 2012. Energy sector vulnerability to climate change: A review. Energy 38, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.11.056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, J., 2016. Product lifecycle management, in: Product Lifecycle Management (Volume 2). Springer, 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yannou, B., 2015. Supporting need seeker innovation: the Radical Innovation Design methodology, in: International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED). Milano, Italy.Google Scholar
Yannou, B., Cluzel, F., Farel, R., 2016. Capturing the relevant problems leading to pain- and usage-driven innovations: The Dependency Structure Modeling Value Bucket algorithm. Concurrent Engineering 26, 131–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063293X16666311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yannou, B., Jankovic, M., Leroy, Y., Okudan Kremer, G.E., 2013. Observations From Radical Innovation Projects Considering the Company Context. Journal of Mechanical Design 135. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4023150CrossRefGoogle Scholar