No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
ENVIRONMENTAL LABELING OF ELECTRICAL ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT (EEE) IN FRANCE: INFORMATION FOR CONSUMERS
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 June 2023
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
The current regulatory framework for Electrical and Electronic Equipment (EEE) is changing and now requires manufacturers to disclose the environmental performance of their products. This means that manufacturers must perform a life cycle analysis (LCA) on their entire range of products. An LCA is a recognized and standardized methodology for assessing the environmental impact of activities. However, communicating this information to consumers is challenging because it can be complicated.
Despite this challenge, there is currently no common standard for communicating environmental information to consumers. The objective of this study is to explore the best practices for conveying environmental information. To achive this, a review of current environmental labeling approaches and recommendations available in the literature is conducted. Additionally, consumer requirements are collected and analyzed through a questionnaire that employs both quantitative and qualitative methods. The information collected is then used to develop the best practices for implementing environmental labeling for EEE.
Keywords
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Creative Commons
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.- Copyright
- The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Ademe. (2021), “Une nouvelle étiquette énergie”, Agir pour la transition écologique | ADEME, 1 September, available at: https://agirpourlatransition.ademe.fr/particuliers/conso/droit-conso/nouvelle-etiquette-energieGoogle Scholar
Ademe. (2023), “Affichage environnemental dans le secteur alimentaire : expérimentation 2020/2021 – Ademe”, Agence de la transition écologique, available at: https://expertises.ademe.fr/economie-circulaire/consommer-autrement/passer-a-laction/reconnaitre-produit-plus-respectueux-lenvironnement/dossier/laffichage-environnemental/affichage-environnemental-secteur-alimentaire-experimentation-20202021Google Scholar
Albertini, J.-P. (2014), “L'expérimentation de l'affichage environnemental en France : contexte et résultats”, Annales des Mines - Responsabilité et environnement, Vol. N° 73 No. 1, p. 28, https://dx.doi.org/10.3917/re.073.0028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barreau, B. and Vielliard, F. (2014), “L'affichage environnemental des produits de consommation courante : les conditions de la réussite”, Annales des Mines - Responsabilité et environnement, ESKA, Paris, Vol. 73 No. 1, pp. 19–22, https://dx.doi.org/10.3917/re.073.0019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Européenne, Comission. (2022), “In focus: A new generation of EU energy labels”, 13 August, available at: https://commission.europa.eu/news/focus-new-generation-eu-energy-labels-2020-08-13_enGoogle Scholar
Décathlon. (n.d.). “Décathlon LA NOTE ENVIRONNEMENTALE”, available at: https://engagements.decathlon.fr/la-note-environnementaleGoogle Scholar
“DEEE-définition-Ecoorganisme Ecologic”. (n.d.)., available at: https://www.e-dechet.com/deee/qu-est-ce-qu-un-deeeGoogle Scholar
Ermenier, K. (2022), “L'Eco-score et le Planet-score livrent leurs premiers bilans d’étape”, 7 February, available at: https://www.processalimentaire.com/vie-des-iaa/l-eco-score-et-le-planet-score-livrent-leurs-premiers-bilans-d-etapeGoogle Scholar
François, J.C.B. (2016), “La réaction des consommateurs à l'information environnementale : une étude expérimentale”, p. 109.Google Scholar
François-Lecompte, A. and Gentric, M. (2016), “L’étiquetage environnemental des produits et services : enjeux et défis”, Decisions Marketing, Vol. 81 No. 1, pp. 99–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
François-Lecompte, A., Gentric, M. and Vendeville, H. (2014), “Efficacité d'un affichage environnemental : le cas du service hôtelier”, Recherches en Sciences de Gestion, ISEOR, Ecully, Vol. 103 No. 4, pp. 43–65, https://dx.doi.org/10.3917/resg.103.0043.Google Scholar
Glimpact. (2021a), “La start-up Glimpact retenue par l'ADEME dans le cadre de l'appel à projet sur l'affichage environnemental des produits alimentaires”, 15 June, available at: https://tool.glimpact.com/content/cpademe15062021.pdfGoogle Scholar
Glimpact. (2021b), “Camaïeu choisit Glimpact et la méthode européenne pour afficher publiquement l'empreinte environnementale globale de ses collections intemporelles”, 15 December, available at: https://tool.glimpact.com/content/151221_CP_Camaieu_Glimpact.pdfGoogle Scholar
Gubbels, A. (2016), L'affichage Environnemental: Etude Des Facteurs Permettant de Crédibiliser Les Écolabels.Google Scholar
Heijungs, R. (2014), “Ten easy lessons for good communication of LCA”, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol. 19 No. 3, pp. 473–476, https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0662-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Homobono, N. and Hauser, A. (2014), “L'information environnementale des consommateurs”, Annales des Mines - Responsabilité et environnement, ESKA, Paris, Vol. 73 No. 1, pp. 7–10, https://dx.doi.org/10.3917/re.073.0007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kühne, S., Reijnen, E., Laasner Vogt, L. and Baumgartner, M. (2023), “Can carbon labels encourage green food choices?”, Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 13, https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.902869.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
LaFranceAgricole. (2023), “Le consensus tarde entre Eco-score et Planet-score”, LaFranceAgricole, 20 February, available at: https://www.lafranceagricole.fr/gestion-et-droit/article/837487/le-consensus-tarde-entre-eco-score-et-planet-scoreGoogle Scholar
Lazard, A. and Atkinson, L. (2015), “Putting Environmental Infographics Center Stage: The Role of Visuals at the Elaboration Likelihood Model's Critical Point of Persuasion”, Science Communication, SAGE Publications Inc, Vol. 37 No. 1, pp. 6–33, https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1075547014555997.Google Scholar
Ministères Écologie Énergie Territoires. (2020), “L'affichage environnemental des produits et des services (hors alimentaire)”, Ministères Écologie Énergie Territoires, available at: https://www.ecologie.gouv.fr/laffichage-environnemental-des-produits-et-des-services-hors-alimentaireGoogle Scholar
Ministères Écologie Énergie Territoires. (2022), “Indice de réparabilité”, Ministères Écologie Énergie Territoires, January, available at: https://www.ecologie.gouv.fr/indice-reparabiliteGoogle Scholar
Muller, L., Lacroix, A. and Ruffieux, B. (2019), “Environmental labelling and consumption changes: A food choice experiment”, Environmental and Resource Economics, Vol. 73 No. online 8 March, p. 871, https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10640-019-00328-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pizzol, M., Laurent, A., Sala, S., Weidema, B., Verones, F. and Koffler, C. (2017), “Normalisation and weighting in life cycle assessment: quo vadis?”, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol. 22 No. 6, pp. 853–866, https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1199-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salommez, G. (2014), “L'affichage environnemental des produits électriques et électroniques”, Annales des Mines - Responsabilité et environnement, Vol. N° 73 No. 1, p. 40, https://dx.doi.org/10.3917/re.073.0040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taufique, K.M.R., Siwar, C., Talib, B., Sarah, F.H. and Chamhuri, N. (2014), “Synthesis of Constructs for Modeling Consumers’ Understanding and Perception of Eco-Labels”, Sustainability, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, Vol. 6 No. 4, pp. 2176–2200, https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su6042176.Google Scholar
Van Hoof, G., Vieira, M., Gausman, M. and Weisbrod, A. (2013), “Indicator selection in life cycle assessment to enable decision making: issues and solutions”, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol. 18 No. 8, pp. 1568–1580, https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0595-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
You have
Access
Open access