Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T17:05:06.815Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

EXPLORATORY RESEARCH ON CULTURAL COMPUTING FOR HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION. THE CASE OF SUSTAINABILITY.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2021

Lou Grimal ,
Inès di Loreto  and
Nadège Troussier
Lou Grimal*
Affiliation:
ICD, CREIDD, Université de Technologie de Troyes, 12 rue Marie Curie, 10004 Troyes, France;
Inès di Loreto
Affiliation:
ICD, Tech-CICO, Université de Technologie de Troyes, 12 rue Marie Curie, 10004 Troyes, France
Nadège Troussier
Affiliation:
ICD, CREIDD, Université de Technologie de Troyes, 12 rue Marie Curie, 10004 Troyes, France;
*
Grimal, Lou, Univesité de Technologie de Troyes, CREIDD, France, lou.grimal@utt.fr

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The digital transition refers to the fact that information technology (IT) tools are used in all our activities on a daily basis. In this article, we will study the use of IT tools in engineering activities. It is possible to say that today IT tools accompany engineers in their professional practices. This presence of computing has also enabled the development and considerable changes in human-technologies interactions. Moreover, the socio-economic context has evolved considerably, and environmental issues have taken on an important role in engineering. We ask whether and to what extent these two contexts (digital and ecological) have changed the expectations of design professionals with regard to IT tools. Should the way of addressing the type of human-machine interaction in engineering tools be modified in depth? The objective of this paper is to understand what types of human-computer interaction would allow a more satisfying user experience for those future engineers who are using new technologies and marked by the ecological urgency. To do so, we will focus on a particular engineering context (design for sustainability) and a particular engineering practice (LCA practice).

Keywords

Cultural computingSustainabilityCollaborative designHuman-Computer InteractionTechnology
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 1: ICED21 , August 2021 , pp. 1471 - 1480
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Bjørn, A., Diamond, M., Owsianiak, M., Verzat, B. and Hauschild, M.Z. (2015), “Strengthening the Link between Life Cycle Assessment and Indicators for Absolute Sustainability To Support Development within Planetary Boundaries”, Environmental Science & Technology, American Chemical Society, Vol. 49 No. 11, pp. 6370–6371.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borrion, A., Matsushita, J., Austen, K., Johnson, C. and Bell, S. (2019), “Development of LCA Calculator to support community infrastructure co-design”, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol. 24 No. 7, pp. 1209–1221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boustead, I. (1996), “LCA — how it came about”, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol. 1 No. 3, pp. 147–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietz, S. and Neumayer, E. (2007), “Weak and strong sustainability in the SEEA: Concepts and measurement”, Ecological Economics, Vol. 61 No. 4, pp. 617–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dourish, P. (2004), Where the Action Is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hansen, A.-M.S. (2020), “The App Is Not Where the Action Is: Discussing Features of an Internal Communication System for a Permaculture Village”, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on ICT for Sustainability, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, pp. 275–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkes, J. (2001), The Fourth Pillar of Sustainability: Culture's Essential Role in Public Planning, Common Ground.Google Scholar
Heitlinger, S., Bryan-Kinns, N. and Jefferies, J. (2013), “Sustainable HCI for grassroots urban food-growing communities”, Proceedings of the 25th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference on Augmentation, Application, Innovation, Collaboration - OzCHI ’13, presented at the the 25th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference, , Adelaide, Australia, pp. 255–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilbert, M. (2020), “Digital technology and social change: the digital transformation of society from a historical perspective”, Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 189–194.Google ScholarPubMed
Hunt, R.G., Franklin, W.E. and Hunt, R.G. (1996), “LCA — How it came about”, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 4–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jørgensen, A. (2007), “The importance of the application context for the design of Social LCA methodology”, presented at the Cycle 2007: Towards a Life Cycle Economy, available at: https://orbit.dtu.dk/en/publications/the-importance-of-the-application-context-for-the-design-of-socia (accessed 6 December 2020).Google Scholar
Lejeune, C. (2019), Manuel d'analyse qualitative, De Boeck Superieur.Google Scholar
McDonald, S., Malys, N. and Malienė, V. (2009), “Urban Regeneration for Sustainable Communities: A Case Study”, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 49–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norton, J., Penzenstadler, B. and Tomlinson, B. (2019), “Implications of Grassroots Sustainable Agriculture Community Values on the Design of Information Systems”, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 3 No. CSCW, p. 34:1-34:22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sustainability, PRé. (2021), “Software Installation”, SimaPro Help Center, 4 March, available at: https://support.simapro.com/articles/Article/SimaPro-Installation (accessed 4 March 2021).Google Scholar
Rauterberg, M. (2006a), “Usability in the Future - explicit and implicit effects in cultural computing”, in Heinecke, H.M. and Paul, H. (Eds.), Mensch Und Computer 2006, Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag, München, available at:https://doi.org/10.1524/9783486841749.29.Google Scholar
Rauterberg, M. (2006b), “How to Assess the User's Experience in Cultural Computing”, p. 7.Google Scholar
Rauterberg, M. (2015), “From Personal to Cultural Computing: how to assess a cultural experience”, p. 10.Google Scholar
Rice, G., Clift, R. and Burns, R. (1997), “Comparison of currently available european LCA software”, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 53–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, S., Bawa, S. and Lomash, H. (2016), “Proliferation of Social Computing: Cultural Computing Paradigm”, International Journal of Computer Applications, Vol. 137 No. 9, pp. 27–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandeventer, J.S., Cattaneo, C. and Zografos, C. (2019), “A Degrowth Transition: Pathways for the Degrowth Niche to Replace the Capitalist-Growth Regime”, Ecological Economics, Vol. 156, pp. 272–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vetter, A. (2018), “The Matrix of Convivial Technology – Assessing technologies for degrowth”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 197, pp. 1778–1786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, D.G. (1997), “Life cycle costing—Theory, information acquisition and application”, International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 15 No. 6, pp. 335–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar