Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:02:47.547Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

HOW DESIGNERS STRATEGICALLY MANAGE PRODUCT PORTFOLIOS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2021

Torbjörn Andersson*
Affiliation:
Linköping University, Dep. Management and Engineering, Div. of Machine Design
Johan Ölvander
Affiliation:
Linköping University, Dep. Management and Engineering, Div. of Machine Design
Renee Wever
Affiliation:
Linköping University, Dep. Management and Engineering, Div. of Machine Design
*
Andersson, Torbjörn Per, Linköping University, Machine design, Sweden, torbjorn.andersson@liu.se

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The continuous management of a manufacturing company's product portfolio is a key aspect of successful product development. Managers determine when and which products should be updated or terminated. This process influences inhouse Industrial design teams, thus prompting a range of development strategies they might deploy. In product portfolio management there is a tension between standardisation and customisation. From a marketing perspective this is may be addressed through brand DNA, from engineering through modularization. The design perspective (merging those two) has been ill-explored, particularly from professional designers. Previously we proposed a theoretical model describing different industrial design projects and how they influence industrial designers strategic thinking. It was developed through literature reviews and examples found in manufacturing industry. Through a multi-case interview study with 16 participants from five manufacturing companies with strong brands, this article aims to empirically evaluate the proposed model. The results show that the respondents could describe all but one industrial design projects, the cause maybe that they had not been exposed to saving a company by doing a total makeover.

Type
Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Aaker, D. (1997), Should You Take Your Brand to Where the Action Is? Harvard Business Review, Volume 75, Issue 5, pp. 135143.Google Scholar
Andersson, T. (2016), Aesthetic flexibility: modularity of visual form in product portfolios and branded products. Licentiate, Linköping University Electronic Press.Google Scholar
Andersson, T. (2021), Aesthetic flexibility: In Industrial Design Practice. Doctoral thesis, Linköping University Electronic Press.10.3384/diss.diva-173826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersson, T., and Warell, A. (2015), Aesthetic flexibility in the management of visual product branding. Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 21912198.10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersson, T., Wever, R., Ölvander, J., and Warell, A. (2021), Product Portfolio Management in Industrial Design: a model of design strategies for mature portfolios. Int. J. of Product Development - Accepted under condition of minor revisionGoogle Scholar
Becerra, L. (2016), CMF Design: The Fundamental Principles of Colour, Material and Finish Design. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Frame Publishers.Google Scholar
Buxton, B. (2007), Sketching User Experiences: Getting the Design Right and the Right Design. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
Cooper, R.G., Edgett, S.J., and Kleinschmidt, E.J. (1999), New Product Portfolio Management: Practices and Performances. Journal of Prod Innov Manag Volume16, pp. 333351.10.1111/1540-5885.1640333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, R.G., Edgett, S.J., and Kleinschmidt, E.J. (2004), Benchmarking Best NPD Practices – I. Research-Technology Management, Volume 47, Issue 1, pp. 3143.10.1080/08956308.2004.11671606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenhardt, M. K. (1989), Building theories from case study research. A. of Manag. Review, 14(4), p.532550.Google Scholar
Gartman, D. (1994), Harley Earl and the Art and Color Section: The Birth of Styling at General Motors. Design Issues, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp. 322.10.2307/1511626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansson, U., and Holm-Svengren, L. (2008), Patterns of interaction, A study of relations between designers, engineers, marketers, and top management in four companies. Proceedings, Design Management Institute, education conference, Paris.Google Scholar
Kapferer, J-N. (2014), The new strategic Brand Management: Advanced insights & strategic Thinking, 5ed. Gosport Hampshire UK: Kogan Limited.Google Scholar
Karjalainen, M., and Snelders, D. (2010), Design Visual Recognition for the Brand. Journal of Product Innovation Management, Volume 27, pp. 622.10.1111/j.1540-5885.2009.00696.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, K.L., Aperia, T., and Georgson, M. (2012), Strategic Brand Management: A European Perspective 2nd ed, Harlow, England: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
Kim, W.C., and Mauborgne, R. (2005), Value Innovation: A Leap into the Blue Ocean. J. of Business Strategy, Volume 26, Issue 4, pp. 2228.Google Scholar
Miles, M.B., Huberman, M.A., and Saldaña, J. (2014), Qualitative Data Analysis. 3ed. SageGoogle Scholar
Meyer, M.H. and Lehnerd, A.P. (1997). The Power of Product Platforms: Building Value and Cost Leadership. New York, NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Persson, M., and Åström, P. (2006), Managerial Issues in Modularising Complex Products. Technovation, Volume 26, pp. 12011209.10.1016/j.technovation.2005.09.020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ranscombe, C., Hicks, B., and Mullineux, G. (2012), A Method for Exploring Similarities and Visual References to Brand in the Appearance of Mature Mass-Market Products. Design Studies, Volume 33, Issue 5, pp. 496520.10.1016/j.destud.2012.04.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simson, T.W., Siddique, Z., and Jiao, J. (2006), Product Platform and Product Family Design: Methods and Applications, New York, NY: Springer Science and Business Media.10.1007/0-387-29197-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tovey, M., 1992. Intuitive and Objective Processes in Automotive Design. Design Studies, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp. 2341.10.1016/0142-694X(92)80003-HCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulrich, K., Eppinger, S. D., and Yang, M. C. (2020), Product Design and Development. 7th ed. McGraw-Hill Education, New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Unilever (2020), Unilever all Brands. Available at: https://www.unilever.com/brands/?page=4 [Accessed 28 May 2020].Google Scholar
Villamil, C., and Hallstedt, S. (2018), Sustainability Product Portfolio – a Review. European Journal of Sustainable Development, Volume 7, Issue 4, pp. 146158.10.14207/ejsd.2018.v7n4p146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warell, A. (2006), Identity Recognition in Product Design: An Approach for Design Management. Proceedings of the 13th International ProductGoogle Scholar
Yin, R. (2014), Case study research: Design and methods. 5ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar