Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:19:01.255Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nurture employees’ creative behaviors: unveiling the impact of design thinking on human organizational behavior

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2024

Michele Melazzini*
Affiliation:
Department of Design, Politecnico di Milano, Italy
Gianluca Carella
Affiliation:
Department of Design, Politecnico di Milano, Italy MIT Morningside Academy for Design, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, United States of America

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This research explores the impact of Design Thinking (DT) on Organizational Behaviour, explicitly focusing on individual employees, the micro-level of the organization. The research runs a single-case study within an Italian bank adopting DT through its HR department. The study proposes a model illustrating how DT adoption influences specific individual behavioral constructs: motivations, attitudes, capabilities, and creative behaviors. The study finds that fostering confidence in the creative process enhances human engagement and proactivity.

Type
Design Organisation, Collaboration and Management
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2024.

References

Amabile, T.M. (1988), “From individual creativity to organizational innovation”, Innovation: A Cross-Disciplinary Perspective, Norwegian University Press, Oslo 6, Norway, pp. 139166.Google Scholar
Amabile, T.M. (1996), “Creativity and Innovation in Organizations”.Google Scholar
Beckman, S.L. and Barry, M. (2007), “Innovation as a Learning Process: Embedding Design Thinking”, California Management Review, Vol. 50 No. 1, pp. 2556, https://dx.doi.org/10.2307/41166415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, T. (2008), “Design Thinking”, Harvard Business Review, 1 June, No. June 2008.Google Scholar
Brown, T. (2009), Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation, Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Buchanan, R. (2015), “Worlds in the Making: Design, Management, and the Reform of Organizational Culture”, She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 521, https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2015.09.003.Google Scholar
Carlgren, L., Rauth, I. and Elmquist, M. (2016), “Framing Design Thinking: The Concept in Idea and Enactment”, Creativity and Innovation Management, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 3857, https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/caim.12153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, N. (1982), “Designerly ways of knowing”, Design Studies, Vol. 3 No. 4, pp. 221227, https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(82)90040-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, N. (2001), “Designerly Ways of Knowing: Design Discipline Versus Design Science”, Design Issues, Vol. 17 No. 3, pp. 4955, https://dx.doi.org/10.1162/074793601750357196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummings, L.L. (1978), “Toward Organizational Behavior”, Academy of Management Review, Academy of Management, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 9098, https://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amr.1978.4296377.Google Scholar
Dell'Era, C., Magistretti, S., Cautela, C., Verganti, R. and Zurlo, F. (2019), “Four kinds of design thinking: From ideating to making, engaging, and criticizing”, Creativity and Innovation Management, https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/caim.12353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunne, D. (2018), Design Thinking at Work: How Innovative Organizations Are Embracing Design, University of Toronto Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/9781487513788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easton, G. (1995), “Case Research As A Methodology For Industrial Networks: A Realist Apologia”, In: Turnbull, P W; Yorke, D; Naud, P. IMP Conference (11th): Interaction, Relationships And Networks: Past - Present - Future; 07 Sep 1995-09 Sep 1995; Manchester Federal School of Business and Management, Manchester, United Kingdom. IMP; 1995., IMP, available at: https://www.escholar.manchester.ac.uk/uk-ac-man-scw:2n485.Google Scholar
Edmonds, W.A. and Kennedy, T.D. (2016), An Applied Guide to Research Designs: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods, SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071802779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsbach, K.D. and Stigliani, I. (2018), “Design Thinking and Organizational Culture: A Review and Framework for Future Research”, Journal of Management, Vol. 44 No. 6, pp. 22742306, https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206317744252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garbuio, M., Lovallo, D., Porac, J. and Dong, A. (2015), “A Design Cognition Perspective on Strategic Option Generation”, in Gavetti, G. and Ocasio, W. (Eds.), Advances in Strategic Management, Vol. 32, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 437465, https://doi.org/10.1108/S0742-332220150000032014.Google Scholar
Glaser, B.G. and Strauss, A.L. (1967), The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, Transaction Publishers. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glen, R., Suciu, C. and Baughn, C. (2014), “The Need for Design Thinking in Business Schools”, Academy of Management Learning & Education, Vol. 13 No. 4, pp. 653667, https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2012.0308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, T., Kelley, D. and Publishers, H. (2013), Creative Confidence: Unleashing the Creative Potential Within Us All, William Collins.Google Scholar
Kolko, J. (2009), “Abductive Thinking and Sensemaking: The Drivers of Design Synthesis”, Design Issues, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 1528, https://doi.org/10.1162/desi.2010.26.1.15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melazzini, M., Colombo, F. and Carella, G. (2023), “Prototyping an employee experience model. A participatory action research project to support organizations in redefining the working routines starting from Employee Experience Design.”, EKSIG 2023 Proceedings-From Abstractness to Concreteness-Experiential Knowledge and the Role of Prototypes in Design Research, Politecnico di Milano, pp. 245260.Google Scholar
Micheli, P., Wilner, S.J.S., Bhatti, S.H., Mura, M. and Beverland, M.B. (2019), “Doing Design Thinking: Conceptual Review, Synthesis, and Research Agenda”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 36 No. 2, pp. 124148, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miner, J.B. (2006), Organizational Behavior 3: Historical Origins, Theoretical Foundations, and the Future, Routledge, http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315701998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schein, E.H. (2010), Organizational Culture and Leadership, Jossey-Bass, https://doi.org/10.1177/027046769401400247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, J.A. and Hollenbeck, J.R. (2014), Organizational Behavior: Securing Competitive Advantage, Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003009580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yin, R.K. (2009), Case Study Research: Design and Methods, SAGE.Google Scholar
Zurlo, F. (2019), “Designerly Way of Organizing. Il Design dell'Organizzazione Creativa | Designerly Way of Organizing. The Design of Creative Organization”, Agathon, No. 5, pp. 1120, https://dx.doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/522019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zurlo, F. and Cautela, C. (2013), “Design Strategies in Different Narrative Frames”, Design Issues, Vol. 30 No. 1, pp. 1935, https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar