No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Territorial design: ethological design or political design or both?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 May 2024
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Based on 4 codesign cases and 15 designer interviews, this article presents how territorial design serves as a catalyst for shared values in community living. Examining user experience and design goals, it reveals how ethological and political values shape territories and the design process. Participants explore new work methodologies, redefine collective activities and navigate in tensions, power issues and political dimensions. The codesign space transforms political interactions, shifting from controversy to conception, offering a new experience and perspective on territorial discussions.
- Type
- Industrial Design
- Information
- Creative Commons
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.- Copyright
- The Author(s), 2024.
References
Abercrombie, N., Hill, S., and Turner, B. (1984). The Penguin Dictionary of Sociology. Penguin Books Ltd.Google Scholar
Alexander, E. R. (1982). "Design in the Decision-Making Process." Policy Sciences, Vol.14 No.3, 279–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atzili, B., and Kadercan, B. (2017). "Territorial designs and international politics : The diverging constitution of space and boundaries." Territory, Politics, Governance, Vol.5 No.2, 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2016.1266962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bastien, S. (2007). "Observation participante ou participation observante? Usages et justifications de la notion de participation observante en sciences sociales." Recherches qualitatives, Vol.27 No.1, 127. https://doi.org/10.7202/1085359arCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Björgvinsson, E., Ehn, P., and Hillgren, P.-A. (2010). "Participatory design and “democratizing innovation.” Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference, pp. 41–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonin, S., and Folléa, B. (2018). "Projet de paysage, projet agricole et design territorial." Agronomie, environnement & sociétés, Vol.8 No.2Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1978). "Sur l'objectivation participante. Réponse à quelques objections." Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales. Vol. 23, 67–69.Google Scholar
Brown, S. D., and Capdevila, R. (1999). "Perpetuum mobile: Substance, force and the sociology of translation." The Editorial Board of the Sociological Review.Google Scholar
Charmaz, K. (2008). "Grounded Theory as an Emergent Method." In: Handbook of emergent methods. S.N. Hesse-Biber&P.Leavy, pp. 155–172.Google Scholar
Cooper, R., Junginger, S., and Lockwood, T. (2009)." Design Thinking and Design Management: A Research and Practice Perspective". Design Management Review, Vol.20 No.2, pp.46–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1948-7169.2009.00007.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, K. (2001). "Illusion, Reality, and the Politics of Place." The Good Society, Vol.10 No.2, pp.12–15.Google Scholar
Cox, K. (2002). "The territorial structure of the state : Some critical reflections." Rencontres scientifiques franco-Sud-Africaines de l'innovation territoriale ( Grenoble - Avignon, France), pp.15.Google Scholar
Debarbieux, B. (1999). "Le territoire: Histoires en deux langues. A bilingual (his-)story of territory." In: Discours scientifique et contextes culturels. Géographies françaises à l’épreuve postmoderne. Maison des Sciences de l'homme d'Aquitaine, pp. 33–34.Google Scholar
Delahais, T., Devaux-Spatarakis, A., and Ridde, A. R. et V. (2021). Introduction: Évaluer en fonction de quelles valeurs? https://scienceetbiencommun.pressbooks.pub/evaluationanthologie/chapter/introduction-evaluer-en-fonction-de-quelles-valeurs/Google Scholar
Delbaere, M., McQuarrie, E. F., and Phillips, B. J. (2011). "Personification in Advertising." Journal of Advertising, Vol.40 No.1, 121–130. https://doi.org/10.2753/JOA0091-3367400108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duhem, L., and de Moura, Pereira, R. (2020). Design des territoires. Eterotopia Editions.Google Scholar
Faure, A., and Négrier, E. (2019). "Territoire". In: Boussaguet, L., Jacquot, S., & Ravinet, P., Dictionnaire des politiques publiques (5ème édition). SciencesPo Les Presses.Google Scholar
Garner, S., and McDonagh-Philp, D. (2001). "Problem Interpretation and Resolution via Visual Stimuli: The Use of ‘Mood Boards’ in Design Education." Journal of Art & Design Education, Vol.20 No.1, 57–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5949.00250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentès, A., and Selker, T. (2013). "Beyond Rhetoric to Poetics in IT Invention." In: Kotzé, P., Marsden, G., Lindgaard, G., Wesson, J. et Winckler, M. (Éds.), Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2013 (vol. 8119, p. 267–279). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40477-1_17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentès, A., Valentin, F., and Brulé, E. (2015). "Mood boards as a tool for the “in-discipline” of design." IASDR 2015, Brisbane, Australia.Google Scholar
Gwiazdzinski, L. (2015). "Le design territorial nouvelle frontière de l'action publique". In: La 27e Région, Chantiers ouverts au public. La documentation Française, pp. 470–482.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1985). Théorie de l'agir communicationnel. Tome 1 : Rationalité de l'agir et rationalisation de la société. Fayard.Google Scholar
Hatchuel, A. (2005). "Quelle analytique de la conception ? Parure et pointe en Design." Colloque « Le design en question(s) ».Google Scholar
Heath, H., & Cowley, S. (2004)." Developing a grounded theory approach: A comparison of Glaser and Strauss." International Journal of Nursing Studies, Vol.41 N.2, 141–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7489(03)00113-5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heinich, N. (2020). "A Pragmatic Redefinition of Value(s): Toward a General Model of Valuation. Theory", Culture & Society, Vol.37 No.5, 75–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276420915993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hémon, S., Gentès, A., and Bessières, D. (2023). "Le design à l’épreuve du territoire : Pratiques exploratoires et métiers émergents." Sciences du design, No.17, 82-100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iversen, O. S., Halskov, K., and Leong, T. W. (2010). "Rekindling Values in Participatory Design." Proceedings of the 11th biennial participatory design conference, pp. 91–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jolivet-Duval, M., Safin, S., and Huron, S. (2022). "Design territorial, représentations spatiales et participation citoyenne : Revue de cas et analyse d'outils." Sciences du Design, No. 14, pp. 55–75. https://doi.org/10.3917/sdd.014.0055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kärrholm, M. (2007). "The Materiality of Territorial Production: A Conceptual Discussion of Territoriality, Materiality, and the Everyday Life of Public Space." Space and Culture, Vol.10 No.4, pp. 437–453. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331207304356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, B. (1991)." Technology is society made durable". La gestion de la recherche. pp.103–131.Google Scholar
Minsky, M. (2006). The emotion machine: Commonsense thinking, artificial intelligence, and the future of the human mind. Simon & Schuster. http://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0705/2006044367-s.htmlGoogle Scholar
Molnar, S., and Palmås, K. (2022). "Dissonance and diplomacy: Coordination of conflicting values in urban co-design." CoDesign, Vol.18 No.4, pp. 416–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2021.1968441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parente, M. (2016)." Design for Territories as reflective practice." PAD. Pages on Arts & Design, vol.13, pp. 10–27.Google Scholar
Parente, M., & Sedini, C. (2017)." Design for Territories as Practice and Theoretical Field of Study." The Design Journal, Vol. 20, S3047–S3058. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, J. (2016). "War and peace in codesign." CoDesign, Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 171–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2015.1112813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Picholle, É., Wagner, R., Ecken, C., Raimbault, E., Blanquet, et al., (2009). "Synthèse: La personnification de l'objet technique: Stratégie narrative ou cognitive?". Sciences & Fictions, pp. 33–42.Google Scholar
Poudray, V., Mao, P., and Senil, N. (2019). "Le design est-il une nouvelle forme de l'action publique territoriale?" Agronomie, environnement & sociétés, Vol.8 No.2, pp. 22–30.Google Scholar
Rancière, J. (2013)." L'introuvable populisme." In: Qu'est-ce qu'un peuple ? La Fabrique Éditions, pp. 137–143. https://doi.org/10.3917/lafab.colle.2013.01.0137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, E. B.-N., Brandt, E., and Binder, T. (2010). "A framework for organizing the tools and techniques of participatory design." Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference, pp. 195–198. https://doi.org/10.1145/1900441.1900476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, E. B.-N., and Stappers, P. J. (2008). "Co-creation and the new landscapes of design." CoDesign, Vol. 4 N.1, pp. 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vines, J., Clarke, R., Wright, P., McCarthy, J., & Olivier, P. (2013). "Configuring participation: On how we involve people in design." Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 429–438. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2470716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
You have
Access
Open access