Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T14:21:30.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Use of Function Modelling Methods in Industry: Insights from a Large Scale Study with an Automotive OEM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2022

U. Yildirim ,
F. Campean  and
A. Uddin
U. Yildirim*
Affiliation:
Hubei University of Automotive Technology, China University of Bradford, United Kingdom
F. Campean
Affiliation:
University of Bradford, United Kingdom
A. Uddin
Affiliation:
Jaguar Land Rover, United Kingdom
*
U.yildirim@huat.edu.cn

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper presents an evaluation study for the System State Flow Diagram function modeling framework based on a large-scale study with an automotive OEM. Technical reports are used to evaluate the usage of the framework within the organization. The paper also introduces a list of the type of problems that engineers are interested in in practical function modelling. The findings suggest that there is a widespread uptake of the framework across the organization and it supports the usage of relevant key engineering tools within the context of a broader model-based Failure Mode Analysis methodology.

Keywords

functional modellingproduct developmentevaluationintroduction of methods in industry
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 2: DESIGN2022 , May 2022 , pp. 673 - 682
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2022.

References

Albers, A., Rapp, S. Spadinger, M., Richter, T., Birk, C., Marthaler, F. & Heimicke, J., Kurtz, V. and Wessels, H. (2019) The Reference System in the Model of PGE: Proposing a Generalized Description of Reference Products and their Interrelations. Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design, 1(1), 1693–1702. doi:10.1017/dsi.2019.175Google Scholar
Araujo, C.S., Benedetto-Neto, H., Campello, A. C., Segre, F.M. and Wright, I. C. (1996) The Utilization of Product Development Methods: A Survey of UK Industry, Journal of Engineering Design, 7:3, pp. 265–277, DOI: 10.1080/09544829608907940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badke-Schaub, P., Daalhuizen, J., Roozenburg, N. (2011) Towards a Designer-Centred Methodology: Descriptive Considerations and Prescriptive Reflections. In: Birkhofer, H. (eds) The Future of Design Methodology. Springer, London. 10.1007/978-0-85729-615-3_16Google Scholar
Birkhofer, H., Lindemann, U., Albers, A., Meier, M. (2001) Product development as a structured and interactive network of knowledge—a revolutionary approach. In: Culley, SJ, Duffy, A, McMahon, C, Wallace, K (eds) Proceedings of ICED01, Glasgow, August 21–23, Professional Engineering Publishing, UK, pp 457–464.Google Scholar
Booker, J. (2012) A survey-based methodology for prioritising the industrial implementation qualities of design tools. Journal of Engineering Design, 23(7), pp. 507–525. 10.1080/09544828.2011.624986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campean, I.F., Henshall, E. and Brunson, D. (2010) Failure mode avoidance paradigm in automotive engineering design. International Congress on Automotive and Transport Engineering - CONAT, Conference Proceedings. Brasov, 25th-27th Oct 2010, pp.207–214.Google Scholar
Campean, I., Henshall, E., Brunson, D., Day, A., McLellan, R., & Hartley, J. (2011) A Structured Approach for Function Analysis of Complex Automotive Systems. SAE Int. J. Mater. Manuf. 4(1):1255–1267, 10.4271/2011-01-1268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campean, I. F. and Henshall, E. (2012) Systems Engineering Design through Failure Mode Avoidance – an Automotive Industry Perspective, Through-life, Engineering Services Conference, Shrivenham, UK, November 2012.Google Scholar
Campean, F., Henshall, E., Yildirim, U., Uddin, A., Williams, H. (2013a) A Structured Approach for Function Based Decomposition of Complex Multi-disciplinary Systems. In: Abramovici, M., Stark, R. (eds) Smart Product Engineering. Lecture Notes in Production Engineering. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. 10.1007/978-3-642-30817-8_12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campean, I., Henshall, E., and Rutter, B. (2013b) Systems Engineering Excellence Through Design: An Integrated Approach Based on Failure Mode Avoidance. SAE Int. J. Mater. Manf. 6(3):389–401, 10.4271/2013-01-0595.Google Scholar
Campean, F., Yildirim, U. and Henshall, E. (2018) Synthesis of functional models from use cases using the system state flow diagram: a nested systems approach. Paper presented at the 15th International Design Conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia 21-24 May 2018, 2833–2844. 10.21278/idc.2018.0543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobryden, A., Rutter, B., Hartl, D., and Bramson, E. (2017) Failure Mode Avoidance Approach for Hybrid Electric Vehicle Systems. SAE Int. J. Engines, 10(2), doi:10.4271/2017-01-0298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenbart, B. (2014) Supporting interdisciplinary system development through integrated function modelling. PhD dissertation. University of Luxembourg.Google Scholar
Eisenbart, B, Gericke, K and Blessing, L.T.M. (2015) DSM for modelling and analyzing functionality: views of practitioners. In: Proceedings of the 17th international DSM conference.Google Scholar
Eisenbart, B. and Kleinsmann, M. (2017) Implementing shared function modelling in practice: experiences in six companies developing mechatronic products and PSS, Journal of Engineering Design, 28:10-12, 765–798, DOI: 10.1080/09544828.2017.1395395Google Scholar
Eisenbart, B., Gericke, K. & Blessing, L.T.M. (2017a) Taking a look at the utilisation of function models in interdisciplinary design: insights from ten engineering companies. Res Eng Design 28, 299–331. 10.1007/s00163-016-0242-3Google Scholar
Eisenbart, B., Gericke, K., Blessing, L.T.M. et al. . (2017b) A DSM-based framework for integrated function modelling: concept, application and evaluation. Res Eng Design 28, 25–51. 10.1007/s00163-016-0228-1Google Scholar
Erden, M.S., Komoto, H., Van Beek, T.J., D`Amelio, V., Echavarria, E. and Tomiyama, T. (2008) A review of function modeling: approaches and applications. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 22, pp. 147–169. 10.1017/S0890060408000103Google Scholar
Forsberg, K. and Mooz, H. (1998) System Engineering for Faster, Cheaper, Better. Center of Systems Management. 10.1002/j.2334-5837.1999.tb00258.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graessler, I., Hentze, J. and Bruckmann, T. (2018) V-Models for Interdisciplinary Systems Engineering. DESIGN Conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia, pp.747–756. 10.21278/idc.2018.0333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grauberger, P., Wessels, H., Gladysz, B., Bursac, B.N., Matthiesen, S and Albert Albers, A. (2020) The contact and channel approach – 20 years of application experience in product engineering, Journal of Engineering Design, 31:5, 241–265, DOI: 10.1080/09544828.2019.1699035Google Scholar
Gericke, K., Eckert, C.M. and Stacey, M. (2017) What do we need to say about a design method? Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 17), Vancouver, Canada, August 21-25, The Design Society, Glasgow.Google Scholar
Hamraz, B., Caldwell, N.H.M., Ridgman, T.W. and Clarkson, P.J. (2015) FBS Linkage ontology and technique to support engineering change management. Research in Engineering Design, 26:3. 10.1007/s00163-014-0181-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henshall, E., Campean, I., and Rutter, B. (2014) A Systems Approach to the Development and Use of FMEA in Complex Automotive Applications. SAE Int. J. Mater. Manf. 7(2):280–290, 10.4271/2014-01-0740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henshall, E., Rutter, B., and Souch, D. (2015) Extending the Role of Interface Analysis within a Systems Engineering Approach to the Design of Robust and Reliable Automotive Product. SAE Int. J. Mater. Manf. 8(2):322–335, 10.4271/2015-01-0456.Google Scholar
Henshall, E., Campean, F. and Rutter, B. (2017) A Systems Approach to the Development of Enhanced Learning for Engineering Systems Design Analysis. Procedia CIRP, Volume 60, 530–535. 10.1016/j.procir.2017.01.020.Google Scholar
Herzog, E., Hallonquist, J. and Naeser, J. (2012) 4.5.1 Systems Modeling with SysML – an experience report. INCOSE International Symposium, 22: 600–611. doi:10.1002/j.2334-5837.2012.tb01359.xGoogle Scholar
López-Mesa, B. and Bylund, N. (2011) A study of the use of concept selection methods from inside a company. Res Eng Design 22, 7–27. 10.1007/s00163-010-0093-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, H., Krammer, M., Winkler, B., and Schwarzl, C. (2015) Model-based Engineering Workflow for Automotive Safety Concepts. SAE Technical Paper 2015-01-0273, doi:10.4271/2015-01-0273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, Th., Manga, K., Walther, M. and Wallaschek, J. (2007) Results of an Industry Survey on the Application of Dependability Oriented Design Methods. In: Krause, Frank-Lothar: The Future of Product Development, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 175–184. 10.1007/978-3-540-69820-3_19Google Scholar
Naidu, A., Brittle, P., Ma, X., and Rutter, B. (2017) Integrated Systems Engineering Approach for Incremental 48 Volt Hybrid Technology Introduction. SAE Technical Paper 2017-01-1603, doi:10.4271/2017-01-1603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nijssen, E. J., Frambach, R. T. (2000) Determinants of the adoption of new product development tools by industrial firms. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(2), pp. 121–131. 10.1016/S0019-8501(98)00043-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OMG (2019) OMG Systems Modeling Language (OMG SysML™) Specification Version 1.6. Available online at: https://sysml.org/.res/docs/specs/OMGSysML-v1.6-19-11-01.pdfGoogle Scholar
Pahl, G., Beitz, W., Feldhusen, J. & Grote, K.H. (2007) Engineering Design: a systematic approach. 3rd edn. London: Springer. 10.1007/978-1-84628-319-2Google Scholar
Roozenburg, N.F.M. & Eekels, J. (1995) Product Design: Fundamentals and Methods. Chichester: John Wiley &Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
Santos, M., Mendes, C., Banik, T., Franco, F. et al. . (2017) New Approach of Tools Application for Systems Engineering in Automotive Software Development. SAE Technical Paper 2017-01-1601, doi:10.4271/2017-01-1601.Google Scholar
Saxena, A., Davis, T. and Jones, J.A. (2015) A failure mode avoidance approach to reliability. Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS), Palm Harbor, FL, pp. 1–6, doi: 10.1109/RAMS.2015.7105062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, R.B., & Wood, K.L. (2000) Development of a Functional Basis for design. Journal of Mechanical Design, 122, pp. 359–370. 10.1115/1.1289637Google Scholar
Tomiyama, T., Gu, P., Jin, Y., Lutters, D., Kind, C. and Kimura, F. (2009) Design methodologies. Industrial and educational applications. CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 58 No. 2, pp. 543–565. 10.1016/j.cirp.2009.09.003Google Scholar
Tomiyama, T., van Beek, T.J., Alvarez Cabrera, A.A., Komoto, H. and D'Amelio, V. (2013) Making function modeling practically usable. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 27(3), pp. 301–309. DOI: 10.1017/S0890060413000309Google Scholar
Wallace, K. (2011) Transferring Design Methods into Practice. The Future of Design Methodology, Birkhofer, H. (Ed.), Springer, London, pp. 239–248. 10.1007/978-0-85729-615-3Google Scholar
Wolny, S., Mazak, A., Carpella, C. et al. . (2020) Thirteen years of SysML: a systematic mapping study. Softw Syst Model 19, 111–169. 10.1007/s10270-019-00735-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ullman, D.G. (2010) The mechanical design process. 4thedn. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Ulrich, K.T. & Eppinger, S.D. (2003) Product design and development. 3rd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.Google Scholar
Webb, R.D. (2002) Investigation into the application of robustness and reliability tools to the design process. MSc thesis, University of Bradford.Google Scholar
Yeh, T.-M., Pai, F.-Y., Tang, C.-C. (2010) Performance improvement in new product development with effective tools and techniques adoption for high-tech industries. Quality and Quantity, 44 (1), pp. 131–152. 10.1007/s11135-008-9186-7Google Scholar
Yildirim, U., Campean, F., and Williams, H. (2017) Function modeling using the system state flow diagram. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, Vol. 31 No. 4, pp. 413–435. 10.1017/S0890060417000294Google Scholar