Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T09:58:30.634Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Formation of the First Massive Galaxies in Cosmological Simulations and Their Observational Properties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 February 2024

Hidenobu Yajima*
Affiliation:
Center for Computational Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Ten-nodai, 1-1-1 Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8577, Japan
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We study the formation of the first massive galaxies and their observational properties for comparisons with JWST or ALMA data by performing cosmological radiative-hydrodynamics simulations. We find that galaxies in overdense regions have high star formation rates larger than ∼10 M yr-1 at z=10 and their stellar masses reach 109 M. The star formation rates of our model galaxies at z≲12 nicely match recent JWST data. In addition, we show that the morphology of galaxies drastically changes with time via major mergers and stellar feedback.

Type
Contributed Paper
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of International Astronomical Union

References

Abe, M., Yajima, H., Khochfar, S., Dalla Vecchia, C., Omukai, K. 2021, MNRAS, 508, 3226 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiaki, G., Wise, J. H. 2019, MNRAS, 482, 3933 Google Scholar
Donnan, C. T., McLeod, D. J., Dunlop, J. S., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 518, 6011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inayoshi, K., Harikane, Y., Inoue, A. K., Li, W., Ho, L. C. 2022, ApJ (Letters), 938, 10L Google Scholar
Harikane, Y., Ouchi, M., Oguri, M., et al. 2023, ApJS, 265, 5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, L., Kashikawa, N., Wang, S., et. al. 2021, Nature Astronomy, 5, 256 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, J. L., Dalla Vecchia, C., Khochfar, S. 2013, MNRAS, 428, 1857 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komatsu, E., Smith, K. M., Dunkley, J., et al. 2011, ApJS, 192, 18 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naidu, R. P., Oesch, P. A., van Dokkum, P., et al. 2022, ApJ (Letters), 940, 14L Google Scholar
Ono, Y., Harikane, Y., Ouchi, M., et al. submitted to ApJ, arXiv:2208.13582Google Scholar
Collaboration, Planck, Aghanim, N., Akrami, Y., et al. 2020, A&A, 641, 6 Google Scholar
Schaye, J., Dalla Vecchia, C., Booth, C. M. 2010, MNRAS, 402, 1536 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Springel, V. 2005, MNRAS, 364, 1105 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yajima, H., Umemura, M., Mori, M., Nakamoto, T. 2009, MNRAS, 398, 715 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yajima, H., Choi, J. -H., Nagamine, K. 2011, MNRAS, 412, 411 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yajima, H., Li, Y., Zhu, Q., Abel, T., Gronwall, C., Ciardullo, R. 2014, MNRAS, 440, 776 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yajima, H., Nagamine, K., Zhu, Q., Khochfar, S., Dalla Vecchia, C. 2017, ApJ, 846, 30 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yajima, H., Abe, M., Khochfar, S., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 509, 4037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yajima, H., Abe, M., Fukushima, H., et al. submitted to MNRAS, arXiv:2211.12970Google Scholar
Wise, J. H., Turk, M. J., Norman, M. L., Abel, T. 2012, ApJ, 745, 50 CrossRefGoogle Scholar